Advertisement

Hydrological Controls on Ecosystem Gas Exchange in an Arctic Landscape

  • B. Ostendorf
  • P. Quinn
  • K. Beven
  • J. D. Tenhunen
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 120)

Abstract

Excluding those areas disturbed by development, the distribution of plant communities over large expanses of Alaskan tundra has been determined by an integrated, long-term response to natural environmental gradients. Both in relatively flat coastal tundra (Webber 1978) and in the Foothills Province of the Alaskan North Slope (Ostendorf and Reynolds 1993; Chaps. 4 and 5, this Vol.), gradients in water availability caused by topography or microrelief play a particularly important role in determining landscape vegetation patterns. As a result, some aspects of these general patterns are predictable with relatively simple models based solely on topography. Ostendorf and Reynolds (1996; Chap. 14, this Vol.) developed topographically derived models for predicting landscape distribution of communities based on slope and local water discharge. Leadley et al. (Chap. 18, this Vol.) linked patterns of water discharge with a simple ecosystem model to predict landscape patterns of nitrogen availability, vegetation type, plant biomass, and net primary productivity within the Imnavait Creek watershed.

Keywords

Soil Respiration Water Table Depth Time Domain Reflectometry Arctic Tundra Deciduous Shrub 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acock B, Reynolds JF (1990) Model structure and data base management. In: Dixon RK, Meldahl RS, Ruark GA, Warren WG (eds) Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Timber Press, Portland, pp 169–179Google Scholar
  2. Alpert P, Oechel WC (1984) Microdistribution and water loss resistances of selected bryophytes in an Alaskan Eriophorum tussock tundra. Holarct Ecol 7: 111–118Google Scholar
  3. Band LE, Patterson P, Nemani R, Running SW (1993) Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: incorporating hillslope hydrology. Agric For Meteorol 63: 93–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathurst JC (1986) Physically based distributed modelling of an upland catchment using the System Hydrologique Europeen. J Hydrol 87: 97–102Google Scholar
  5. Bergström S (1976) Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. Swed Meteorol Hydrol Inst, Norrköping, Sweden, Rep RH07, 118 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Beven KJ (1986a) Runoff production and flood frequency in catchments of order n: an alternative approach. In: Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Irtube I, Wood EF (eds) Scale problems in hydrology. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 191–219Google Scholar
  7. Beven KJ (1986b) Hillslope runoff processes and flood frequency characteristics. In: Abrahams AD (ed) Hillslope processes. Allen and Unwin, Boston, pp 187–202Google Scholar
  8. Beven K (1993) Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv Water Res 16: 41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24: 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beven KJ, Wood EF, Sivapalan M (1988) On hydrological heterogeneity–catchment morphology and catchment response. J Hydrol 100: 353–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Billings DW (1987) Constraints to plant growth, reproduction, and establishment in arctic environments. Arct Alp Res 19: 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bliss LC (1962) Adaptations of arctic and alpine plants to environmental conditions. Arctic 15: 117–144Google Scholar
  13. Bliss LC (1988) Arctic tundra and polar desert biome. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD (eds) North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  14. Bliss LC, Svoboda J, Bliss DI (1984) Polar deserts, their plant cover and plant production in the Canadian High Arctic. Holarct Ecol 7: 305–324Google Scholar
  15. Chapin FS III, Shaver GR (1985a) Arctic. In: Chabot BF, Mooney HA (eds) Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, New York pp 16–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapin FS III, Fetcher N, Kielland K, Everett KR, Linkins AE (1988) Productivity and nutrient cycling of Alaskan tundra: enhancement by flowing soil water. Ecology 69: 693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clymo RS, Hayward PM (1982) The ecology of Sphagnum. In: Smith AJE (ed) Bryophyte ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 229–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Everett KR, Ostendorf B (1988) Hydrology and geochemistry of a small arctic drainage basin in upland tundra, northern Alaska. In: Senneset K (ed) Proc 5th Int Permafrost Conf, vol 1. Tapir, Trondheim, Norway, pp 574–579Google Scholar
  19. Hinzman LD, Kane DL, Gieck RE, Everett KR (1991) Hydrological and thermal properties of the active layer in the Alaskan Arctic. Cold Reg Sci Tech 19: 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jasienuik MA, Johnson EA (1982) Peatland vegetation organization and dynamics in the western subarctic, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can J Bot 60: 2581–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonasson S (1982) Organic matter and phytomass on three north Swedish tundra sites, and some connections with adjacent tundra areas. Holarct Ecol 5: 367–375Google Scholar
  22. Matthes-Sears U, Matthes-Sears WC, Hastings SJ, Oechel WC (1988) The effects of topography and nutrient status on the biomass, vegetative characteristics, and gas exchange of two deciduous shrubs on an arctic tundra slope. Arct Alp Res 20: 342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oberbauer S, Miller PC (1979) Plant water relations in montane and tussock tundra vegetation types in Alaska. Arct Alp Res 11: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oberbauer S, Miller PC (1982) Growth of Alaskan tundra plants in relation to water potential. Holarct Ecol 5: 194–199Google Scholar
  25. Oberbauer SF, Tenhunen JD, Reynolds JF (1991) Environmental effects on CO2 efflux from water track and tussock tundra in Arctic Alaska, USA. Arct Alp Res 23: 162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oberbauer SF, Gillespie CT, Cheng W, Gebauer R, Sala Serra A, Tenhunen JD (1992) Environmental effects on CO, efflux from riparian tundra in the northern foothills of the Brooks Range, Alaska, USA. Oecologia 92: 568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oechel WC, Hastings SJ, Vourlites G, Jenkins M, Riechers G, Grulke N (1993) Recent change of arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature 361: 520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostendorf B, Reynolds JF (1993) Relationships between a terrain-based hydrologic model and patch-scale vegetation patterns in an arctic tundra landscape. Landscape Ecol 8: 229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostendorf B, Reynolds JF (1996) A model of arctic tundra vegetation derived from topographic gradients. (submitted)Google Scholar
  30. Peterson KM, Billings WD (1980) Tundra vegetational patterns and succession in relation to microtopography near Atkasook, Alaska. Arct Alp Res 12: 473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinn p, Beven K, Chevallier P, Planchon 0 (1991) The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol Proc 5: 59–79Google Scholar
  32. Quinn P, Ostendorf B, Beven KJ, Tenhunen JD (1995) Spatial and temporal soil moisture predictions for an Alaskan catchment using TOPMODEL. (in preparation)Google Scholar
  33. Stoner WA, Miller PC (1975) Water relations of plant species in the wet coastal tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Arct Alp Res 7: 109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stow D, Burns B, Hope A (1989) Mapping arctic tundra vegetation types using digital SPOT/HRVXS data. A preliminary assessment. Int J Rem Sens 10: 1451–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tenhunen JD, Siegwolf RA, Oberbauer SF (1994) Effects of phenology, physiology, and gradients in community composition, structure, and microclimate on tundra ecosystem CO, exchange. In: Schulze E-D, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 431–460Google Scholar
  36. Walker DA (1983) A hierarchical tundra vegetation classification especially designed for mapping in northern Alaska. Proc 4th Int Permafrost Conf. Natl Academic Press, Washington DC, pp 1332–1337Google Scholar
  37. Walker DA, Binnian E, Evans BM, Lederer ND, Nordstrand E, Weber PJ (1989) Terrain, vegetation, and landscape evolution of the R4D research site, Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska. Holarct Ecol 12: 238–261Google Scholar
  38. Webber PJ (1977) Tundra primary productivity. In: Ives JD, Barry RG (eds) Arctic and alpine environments. Methuen, London, pp 445–473Google Scholar
  39. Webber PJ (1978) Spatial and temporal variation of the vegetation and its production, Barrow, Alaska. In: Tieszen L (ed) Vegetation and production ecology of an Alaskan Arctic tundra. Ecological Studies 29. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 37–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Ostendorf
  • P. Quinn
  • K. Beven
  • J. D. Tenhunen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations