General Introduction

  • Derrick de Kerckhove
  • Charles J. Lumsden

Abstract

The Greeks were not unaware of the importance of the role that writing played in their civilization. Æschylus, the presumed author of Prometheus Bound, put the writing of numbers and letters at the source of all human inventions. The story of Prometheus, who was the object of a special cult in Athens as the god of intelligence and technical skill, can be viewed as a founding myth for the western world. It appears that Æschylus may even have had a fair idea of the implications of literacy upon cognitive styles. His interpretation of the myth suggests that Prometheus rescued humankind from the wrath of Zeus by giving them a mind to defend themselves against the hardships of nature:

... they were witless erst and I made them to have sense and be endowed with reason. [... Previously,] though they had eyes to see, they saw to no avail; they had ears, but understood not; but, like to shapes in dreams, throughout their length of days, without purpose they wrought all things in confusion.

Prometheus Bound (1, 443–4/447–450, trans. H. Weir Smith)

Keywords

Clay Posit Ditioned Sorting Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A schylus (1973). Complete works (2 vols). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
  2. Barbu, Z. (1972). Aspects of psychological history. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Changeux, J.-P. (1983). L’homme neuronal. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, M. (1958). La grande invention de l’écriture et son évolution. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, M., and Bruner, J. S. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about psychological processes. American Psychologist, 26, 867–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole, M., and Griffin, P. (1980). Cultural amplifiers reconsidered. In D.R. Olson (Ed.). Social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honour of J. S. Bruner. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology, (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  8. Diringer, D. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  9. Driver, G. R. (1954). Semitic writing: from pictograph to alphabet. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change (2 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Etiemble, R. (1973). L’écriture. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  12. Febvre, L., and Martin, H.J. (1958). L’apparition du livre. Paris: Alb in Michel.Google Scholar
  13. Février, J. G. (1959). Histoire de l’écriture ( 2nd ed. ). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  14. Gelb, I. G. (1963). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology ( 2nd ed. ). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goody, J. (1986). La logique de l’écriture: aux origines des sociétés humaines. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  17. Goody, J., and Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 304–345.Google Scholar
  18. Goody, J., and Watt, I. (1968). Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Graff, H. J. (1981). Literacy and social development in the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Graff, H. J. (1986). The history of literacy: towards the third generation. Interchange, 17, 122–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton, E., and Cairns, H. (Eds.), (1980). Plato. The collected dialogues. (Trans. R. Hack-forth et al.). Bollinger series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Havelock, E.A. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Havelock, E. A. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Havelock, E.A. (1986). The alphabetic mind: a gift of Greece to the modern world. Oral Tradition 1134–150.Google Scholar
  25. Humphreys, G. W., and Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Innis, H. A. (1951). The bias of communications. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Innis, H. A. (1972). Empire and communications (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, D. (1981). The story of writing. New York: Taplinger.Google Scholar
  29. Kerckhove, D. (1984). Effets cognitifs de l’alphabet. In D. de Kerckhove and D. Jutras (Eds.), Pour comprendre 1984 (Occasional Paper N49, pp. 112–129 ). Ottawa: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  30. Lafont, R. (Ed.) (1984). Anthropologie de l’écriture. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.Google Scholar
  31. Larsen, M. T. (1986). Writing on clay: from pictograph to alphabet. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 83–9.Google Scholar
  32. Liggett, S. (1984). The relationship between speaking and writing: an annotated bibliography. College Composition and Communication, 35, 334–344.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, H.-J. (1968–1970). Le livre et la civilisation écrite (3 vols.). Paris: Ecole nationale supérieure des bibliothèques.Google Scholar
  34. McLuhan, H. M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: the bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review 47257–281.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne27,109–121.Google Scholar
  37. Ong, W.J. (1967). The presence of the word. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ong, W. J. (1971). Rhetoric, romance and technology: studies in the interaction of expression and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word. London: Methuen. Plato (1961). In E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rousseau, J. J. (1749). Essay on the origin of language (Trans. J. Moran). New York: Frederic Ungar, 1966.Google Scholar
  41. Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems: a linguistic introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scollon, R. (1985). Language, literacy and learning: An annotated bibliography. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, and A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning (pp. 412–426 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Scribner, S., and Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sinatra, R., and Stahl-Gemake, J. (1983). Using the right brain in the language arts. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
  45. Snell, B. (1953). The discovery of mind. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stone, L. (1969). Literacy and education in England, 1640–1900. Past and Present 4269–139.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, I., and Taylor, M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Woodbury, L. (1983). The literate revolution: a review article. Classical Views/Echos du monde classique 27329–352.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derrick de Kerckhove
  • Charles J. Lumsden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations