Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biokompatibilität und Endoprothesenwerkstoffe

  • Conference paper
Book cover Die zementlose Fixation von Hüftendoprothesen

Zusammenfassung

Körperbeständigkeit und Körperverträglichkeit sind aus biologischer Sicht die wichtigsten Voraussetzungen, die ein Werkstoff erfüllen muß, wenn er als Material für Implantate geeignet sein soll.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anderson JM, Barenberg S, Hiltner A (1981) Prosthetic valve wear products-embolization and systemic presentation. In: Weinstein A, Gibbons D, Brown S, Ruff W (eds) Implant retrieval: Material and biological analysis. NBS, Special publication 601, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Autian J (1964) Toxicity, untoward reactions and related considerations in the medical use of plastics. J Pharm Sci 53 /11: 1289–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Black J (1981) Biological performance of materials, fundamentals of biocompatibility. Dekker, New York Basel

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown S (1979) Developing biocompatibility test methods ASTM committee F-4. Medical device and diagnostic industry, vol 1, No. 5, pp 25–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruck SD (1980) Properties of biomaterials in the physiological environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron HU, Pilliar R, Macnab I (1973) The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 7: 301–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnley J (1963) Tissue reactions to polytetrafluorethylene. Lancet II: 1379

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conzen H, Straumann F, Paschke E (1967) Grundlagen der Alloplastik mit Metallen und Kunststoffen. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dumbleton JH (1981) Tribology of natural and artificial joints. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geduldig D, Dörre E, Happel M, Lade R, Prüssner P, Willert HG, Zichner L (1975) Welche Aussicht hat die Biokeramik als Implantatmaterial in der Orthopädie? Med Orthop Technik 6: 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinterberger J, Ungethüm M (1978) Untersuchungen zur Tribologie und Festigkeit von Aluminiumoxydkeramik-Hüftendoprothesen. Z Orthop 116 /3: 294–303

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knahr K, Salzer M, Plenk H Jr, Grundschober F, Ramach W (1981) Experience with bioceramic implants in orthopaedic surgery. Biomaterials 2 /4: 98–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leininger RI (1972) Polymers as surgical implants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 333–381

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linder L, Lundskog J (1975) Incorporation of stainless steel, titanium and vitallium in bone. Br J Accident Surg 6 /4: 277–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lundskog J (1972) Heat and bone tissue — An experimental investigation of the thermal properties of bone tissue and threshold levels for thermal injury. Elanders, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meachim G (1976) Histological interpretation of tissue changes adjacent to orthopaedic implants. In: Williams D (ed) Biocompatibility of implant materials. Sector, London, pp 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mears DC (1979) Materials and orthopaedic surgery. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muhr G, Stockhusen H, Müller 0 (1976) Die Hüftarthroplastik mit isoelastischen Totalendoprothesen im Tierexperiment. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 86: 115–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pflüger N, Böhler F, Grundschober H, Plenk H Jr, Schider S (1980) Die Verankerung von porös beschichteten bzw. Oberflächenstrukturierten Tantal-Totalendoprothesen im Tierexperiment. In: Jäger M, Hackenbroch MH, Refior HJ (Hrsg) Grenzschichtprobleme der Verankerung von Implantaten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Endoprothesen. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, S 166–172

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plenk H Jr, Locke H, Punzet G, Salzer M, Zweymüller K (1980) Tissue reactions to debris from bioceramic endoprostheses. In: Winter GD, Leray JL, de Groot K (eds) Evaluation of biomaterials. Wiley and Sons, Chichester New York Brisbane Toronto, pp 431–439

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plenk H Jr, Endler M, Gritler D, Grundschober F, Schnabl A (1981) Tissue reaction to a cement-free screw type HDPE socket endoprosthesis for the hip joint. Secon European Conference on biomaterials, Gothenburg, pp 71–72

    Google Scholar 

  22. Plenk H Jr (1982) Persönliche Mitteilung

    Google Scholar 

  23. Plitz W, Griss P (1981) Clinical, histo-morphological and material related observations on removed alumina-ceramic hip joint components. In: Weinstein A, Gibbons D, Brown S, Ruff W (eds) Implant retrieval: Material and biological analysis. NBS, Special publication 601, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 131–156

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salzer M, Knahr K, Locke H, Stärk N (1978) Cement-free bioceramic double-cup endoprosthesis of the hip-joint. Clin Orthop 134: 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  25. Salzer M, Knahr K, Plenk H Jr (1981) Long-term clinical and histological evaluation of bioceramic total hip endoprosthesis. Intern Orthopedics 4 /11: 1231–1240

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scales JT (1972) Some aspects of Stanmore total hip prostheses and their development. In: Chapchal G (ed) Arthroplasty of the hip. Thieme, Stuttgart, S. 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schoen FJ, Titus JL, Lawrie GM (1981) Materials degeneration causing late failure of mechanical heart valve prostheses: problems and promise. In: Weinstein A, Gibbons D, Brown S, Ruff W (eds) Implant retrieval: Material and biological analysis. NBS, Special publication 601, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F (1976) Gewebsreaktion auf ein Titan-Hohlzylinderimplantat mit Titan-Spritzschichtoberfläche. SMIZ/RMSO 86 /7: 713–727

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stock D, Gottstein J, Harms P, Kuhlmann GP (1982) Gewährleisten die zur Verfügung stehenden Aluminiumoxyd-Keramik-Hüftendoprothesenmodelle beim derzeitigen Stand der Entwicklung eine ausreichende Zuverlässigkeit? Med Orthop Techn 1: 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Süry P, Semlitsch M (1978) Corrosion behaviour of cast and forged cobalt based alloys for double–alloy joint endoprostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 12 /5: 723–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thull R (1978) Implantatwerkstoffe für die Endoprothetik. Schiele and Schön, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thull R, Schaldach M (1980) Mechanisch induzierte Korrosion an Gleit-und Fixierungselementen hoch belasteter Endoprothesen. In: Jäger M, Hackenbroch MH, Refior HJ (Hrsg) Grenzschichtprobleme der Verankerung von Implantaten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Endoprothesen. Thieme, Stuttgart, S. 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  33. UhthoffHK (1973) Mechanical factors influencing the holding power of screws in compact bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 55 /3: 633–639

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weber BG, Stühmer G, Semlitsch M (1974) Erfahrungen mit dem Kunststoff Polyester als Komponente der Rotationstotalprothese des Hüftgelenkes. Z Orthop 112 /5: 1106–1112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weightman B, Paul JL, Rose R, Simon S, Radin EL (1973) A comparative study of total hip replacement prostheses. J Biomech 6: 299–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Weinstein A, Gibbons D, Brown S, Ruff W (1981) Implant retrieval: Material and biological analysis. NBS, Special publication 601, U.S. Department of Commerce

    Google Scholar 

  37. Willert HG, Schreiber A (1969) Unterschiedliche Reaktionen von Knochen-und Weichteillager auf autopolymerisierende Kunststoffimplantate. Z Orthop 106 /2: 231–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Willert HG, Semlitsch M (1980) Biomaterialien und orthopädische Implantate. In: Witt AN, Rettig H, Schlegel KF, Hackenbroch M, Hupfauer W (Hrsg) Orthopädie in Praxis und Klinik, Bd I I: Allgemeine Orthopädie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  39. Willert HG, Semlitsch M, Buchhorn G, Kriete U (1978) Materialverschleiß und Gewebereaktion bei künstlichen Gelenken. Orthopäde 7: 62–83

    Google Scholar 

  40. Willert HG, Buchhorn G, Ungethüm M (1980) Proposed guideline for the biological testing of orthopaedic implant materials and implants. Biomaterials 1 /10: 179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Willert HG, Buchhorn G, Semlitsch M (1980) Die Reaktion des Gewebes auf Verschleißprodukte von Gelenk-Endoprothesen der oberen Extremitäten. Orthopäde 9: 94–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Willert HG, Buchhorn U, Prüssner P (1981) Aussagewert biologischer Tests im Rahmen der Überprüfung von Biomaterial. In: Rettig H, Weber U (Hrsg) Symposium über Biomaterialien. Gentner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  43. Willert HG, Buchhorn G, Buchhorn U, Semlitsch M (1981) Tissue response to wear debris in artificial joints. In: Weinstein A, Gibbons D, Brown S, Ruff W (eds) Implant retrieval: Material and biological analysis. NBS, Special publication 601, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 239–267

    Google Scholar 

  44. Willert HG, Buchhorn G, Semlitsch M (1981) Recognition and identification of wear products in the surrounding tissues of artificial joint prostheses. In: Dumbleton JH (ed) Tribology of natural and artificial joints. Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York, pp 381–419

    Google Scholar 

  45. Williams DF (1977) Titanium as a metal for implantation, part 1: Physical properties. J Med Eng Technol 1/4: 195–198, 202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Williams DF (1981) Systemic aspects of biocompatibility, vol 1, 2. CRC series in biocompatibility. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  47. Williams DF (1981) Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials, vol 1, 2. CRC series in biocompatibility. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  48. Williams DF (1982) Biocompatibility of orthopaedic implants, vol 1, 2. CRC series in biocompatibility. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zweymüller K, Semlitsch M (1982) Concept and material properties of a cementless hip prosthesis system with Al2O, ceramic ball heads and wrought Ti-6A1–4V stems. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 229–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. H. G. Willert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. H. Buchhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Felix-Platter-Spital, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Burgfelderstr. 101, CH-4001, Basel, Schweiz

    Erwin Morscher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Willert, H.G., Buchhorn, G.H. (1983). Biokompatibilität und Endoprothesenwerkstoffe. In: Morscher, E. (eds) Die zementlose Fixation von Hüftendoprothesen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00967-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00967-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-00967-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation