Individualization of Treatment for Cancer of the Cervix
If one is to take the position that we should individualize treatment for cancer of the cervix as we do for other diseases according to the patient’s age, general health and outlook one must choose between the two excellent modalities of treatment available to us: radical surgery and radiotherapy, or elect combinations thereof. In order to make this choice dependent upon patient factors rather than therapist factors, by which I mean the training, temperament, departmental policy or other variables related to the physician in charge, we must utilize the biological parameters clinically available for this decision.
KeywordsCobalt Noma Rumania Cystitis Proctitis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Annual Report Vol. 14 — Stockholm. Ed. Hans L. Kottmeier.Google Scholar
- Brunschwig, A., and H. R. K. Barber: Obstet, and Gynec. 27, 21–29 (1966).Google Scholar
- Green, T. H.: Progress in the management and prevention of the urologie complications of radical Wertheim hysterectomy. In: Meigs, J. V., and S. H. Sturgis, Ed., Progress in gynecology, p. 646–659. New York: Grune and Stratton, Publishers 1963.Google Scholar
- Green, T. H.: J. V. Meigs, H. Ulfelder, and R. Curtin: Obstet, and Gynec. 20, 293–312 (1962).Google Scholar
- Greiss, F. C.: Combined radiation and surgical treatment for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. In: Lewis, G. C, W. B. Wentz, and R. M. Jaffe, Ed., New concepts in gynecological oncology, p. 133–141. F. A. Davis Co., Publishers 1966.Google Scholar
- Greiss, F. C.: D. D. Blake, and F. R. Lock: Obstet, and Gynec. 18, 417–427 (1961).Google Scholar
- Gusberg, S. B., and G. G. Herman: Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 87, 60 (1962).Google Scholar
- Masterson, J.: Clin. Obstet. Gynec. 10, 927–939 (1968).Google Scholar
- Yagi, H.: Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 69, 32–47 (1955).Google Scholar