Systems for Quantitative Analysis of Left Ventricular Wall Motion

  • W. J. Rogers
  • L. R. Smith
  • W. P. Hood
  • J. A. Mantle
  • S. E. Papapietro
  • R. O. RussellJr.
  • C. E. Rackley
Conference paper

Abstract

Tennant and Wiggers [1] were perhaps the first to demonstrate the phenomenon of segmental left ventricular dysfunction when, in 1935, they ligated a coronary artery in a dog and at once observed paradoxic motion of the underlying myocardium. Subsequently, Harrison [2] recognized disordered patterns of contraction in the kinetocardiograms of patients with ischemic heart disease and applied the term “asynergy,” and, later, “dyssynergy,” [3] to this condition. More recently, Herman et al. [4], in an elegant quantitative ventriculographic study of patients with coronary artery disease, introduced the now familiar terms “hypokinesis,” “akinesis,” and “dyskinesis” for description of left ventricular contraction abnormalities.

Keywords

Radionuclide Beach Expense Cardiomyopathy Cardiol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tennant R, Wiggers CJ (1935) Effect of coronary occlusion on myocardial contraction. Am J Physiol 112: 351Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrison TR (1955) Some unanswered questions concerning enlargement and failure of the heart. Am Heart J 69: 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harrison TR, Reeves TJ (1968) Principles and problems of ischemic heart disease. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, p 23Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herman MV, Heinle RA, Klein MD, Gorlin R (1967) Localized disorders in myocardial contraction. N Engl J Med 277: 222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaitman BR, DeMots H, Bristow JD, Rosch J, Rahimtoola SH (1975) Objective and subjective analysis of left ventricular angiograms. Circulation 52: 420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW (1976) Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 53: 627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers WJ, Smith LR, Bream PR, Elliott LP, Rackley CE, Russell RO Jr (1982) Quantitative axial oblique contrast left ventriculography: validation of the method by demonstrating improved visualization of regional wall motion and mitral valve function with accurate volume determinations. Am Heart J 103: 185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott LP, Green CE, Rogers WJ, Hood WP, Mantle JA, Papapietro SE (1982) The advantages of the caudo-cranial left anterior oblique left ventriculogram in adult heart disease. Am J Cardiol 49: 369–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith LR, Zisserman D, Cunningham W, Wixson SE, Bishop SP, Hood WP Jr, Mantle JA, Rogers WJ, Russell RO Jr, Logic JR, Rackley CE (1976) Measurement of cardiac parameters from cardiovascular images. Computers in Cardiology, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smalling RW, Skolnik MH, Myers D (1976) Digital boundary detection, volumetric and wall motion analysis of left ventricular cine angiograms. Comput Biol Med 6: 73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chaitman BR, Bristow JD, Rahimtoola SH (1973) Left ventricular wall motion assessed by using fixed external reference systems. Circulation 48: 1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Probst P, Moore R, Kim SW, Zollikofer C, Amplatz K (1981) Comparison of various quantization methods of segmental ventricular wall motion in ischemic heart disease. Fortschr Rontgenstr 134: 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDonald IG (1970) The shape and movements of the human left ventricle during systole. Am J Cardiol 26: 221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feild BJ, Russell RO Jr, Dowling JT, Rackley CE (1972) Regional left ventricular performance in the year following myocardial infarction. Circulation 46: 679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brower RW, Meester GT (1976) Computer based methods for quantifying regional left ventricular wall motion from cine ventriculograms. Computers in Cardiology, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, pp 55–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ingels NB, Daughters GT II, Stinson EB, Alderman EL (1980) Evaluation of methods for quantitating left ventricular segmental wall motion in men using myocardial markers as a standard. Circulation 61: 966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamilton GW, Murray JA, Kennedy JW (1972) Quantitative angiocardiology in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 40: 1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris LD, Clayton PD, Marshall HW, Warner HR (1974) A technique for detection of asynergistic motion in the left ventricle. Comput Biomed Res 7: 380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leighton RF, Wilt SM, Lewis RP (1974) Detection of hypokinesis by a quantitative analysis of left ventricular cineangiograms. Circulation 50: 121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gelberg HJ, Brundage BH, Glantz S, Parmley WW (1979) Quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: a comparison of area, chord, and radial methods. Circulation 59: 991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daughters GT, Alderman EL, Stinson EB, Ingels NB (1979) Methods for ventricular wall motion assessment: towards a uniform terminology. Computers in Cardiology, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, pp 145–148Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rickards A, Seabra-Gomes R, Thurston P (1977) The assessment of regional abnormalities of the left ventricle by angiography. Eur J Cardiol 5: 167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papapietro SE, Smith LR, Hood WP Jr, Russell RO Jr, Rackley CE, Rogers WJ (1978) An optimal method for angiographic definition and quantification of regional left ventricular contraction. Computers in Cardiology, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, pp 293–296Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alderman EL, Schwarzkopf A, Ingels NB, Daughters GT, Stinson EB, Sanders WJ (1979) Application of an externally referenced, polar coordinate system for left ventricular wall motion analysis. Computers in Cardiology, IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach, pp 207–210Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karsch KR, Lamm U, Blanke H, Rentrop KP (1980) Comparison of nineteen quantitative models for assessment of localized left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. Clin Cardiol 3: 123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smalling R, Cole JS, Skolnick M (1979) Comparison of digital boundary detection and semi-automated analysis of left ventricular cine angiograms. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 5: 331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jengo JA, Mena I, Blaufuss A, Criley JM (1978) Evaluation of left ventricular function (ejection fraction and segmental wall motion) by single pass radioisotope angiography. Circulation 57: 326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Okada RD, Pohost GM, Nichols AB, McKusick KA, Strauss HW, Boucher CA, Block PC, Rosenthal SV, Dinsmore RE (1980) Left ventricular regional wall motion assessment by multigated and end-diastolic, end-systolic gated radionuclide left ventriculography. Am J Cardiol 45: 1211Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Papapietro SE, Yester MV, Logic JR, Tauxe WN, Mantle JA, Rogers WJ, Russell RO Jr, Rackley CE (1981) Method for quantitative analysis of regional left ventricular function with first pass and gated blood pool scintigraphy. Am J Cardiol 47: 618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rogers WJ, Logic JR, Yester MV, Papapietro SE, Mantle JA, Smith LR, Rackley CE (1982) Temporal Fourier analysis of gated radionuclide ventriculograms — a tool for visualizing and quantifying left ventricular contraction abnormalities. Am J Cardiol [Abstract] 49: 1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. Rogers
    • 1
  • L. R. Smith
    • 1
  • W. P. Hood
    • 1
  • J. A. Mantle
    • 1
  • S. E. Papapietro
    • 1
  • R. O. RussellJr.
    • 1
  • C. E. Rackley
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineUniversity of Alabama in BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations