Effect of pre-reperfusion portal venous blood flush on early liver transplant function

  • D. F. Mirza
  • B. K. Gunson
  • H. Khalaf
  • J. W. Freeman
  • J. A. C. Buckels
  • P. McMaster
  • A. D. Mayer
Conference paper

Abstract

Portal venous blood for rinsing out the University of Wisconsin solution (UWs) has the advantages of being a physiological fluid, removing acidotic mesenteric venous blood and perhaps resulting in more stable haemodynamic parameters during reperfusion. A group of 209 consecutive adult OLTs carried out between July 1993 and February 1995 were studied prospectively. The UWs was flushed out with 500 ml portal blood in 95 OLTs (group 1) and with 1.0 L 0.5% dextrose at 37 °C in 114 OLTs (group 2). The median day 1 and peak day 1–5 AST levels were significantly elevated in the 5% dextrose group: median 755 (118–11090) vs. 546 (121–6150) IU/1 (P = 0.007, Wilcoxon); and median 1095 (159–11 090) vs. 744 (157–7870) IU/1 (p = 0.008, Wilcoxon), respectively. A median of 5 (0–27) units of blood were transfused in group 1 compared to 4 (0–54) units in group 2 (n. s.). There was no difference in peak bilirubin, lowest day 1–5 PT levels, primary nonfunction, median ITU stay, total inpatient stay and 1-month graft survival between the two groups (89% vs. 88%). Prereperfusion blood flush may be associated with less hepatocellular damage, without significant additional blood usage.

Key words

Early graft function Liver transplantation Preservation Reperfusion injury 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clavien PA, Harvey PRC, Strasberg SM (1992) Preservation and reperfusion injuries in liver allografts — an overview and and synthesis of current studies. Transplantation 53: 957 - 978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chazouilleres O, Calmus Y, Vanbourdolle M, Ballet F (1993) Preservation induced liver injury. Clinical aspects, mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. J Hepatol 18: 123-134Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Currin RT, Toole JG, Thorman RG, Le-masters JJ (1990) Evidence that Carolina rinse solution protects sinusoidal endothelial cells against reperfusion injury after cold ischaemic storage of rat liver. Transplantation 50: 1076 - 1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brems JJ, Takiff H, McHutchinson J, Collins D, Biermann LA, Pockros P (1993) Systemic versus nonsystemic re-perfusion of the transplanted liver. Transplantation 55: 527 - 529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suzuki S, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Rodriguez EJ, Cejalvo D (1993) Neutrophil infiltration as an important factor in liver ischaemia and reperfusion injury — modulating effects effects of FK506 and cyclosporine. Transplantation 55: 12651272Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishiyama R, Nakamura S, Suzuki S, Baba S (1993) Platelet activating factor in hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury — the effects of a PAF antagonist combined with a prostaglandin Iz analogue. Transplantation 55: 1261 - 1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. F. Mirza
    • 1
  • B. K. Gunson
    • 1
  • H. Khalaf
    • 1
  • J. W. Freeman
    • 1
  • J. A. C. Buckels
    • 1
  • P. McMaster
    • 1
  • A. D. Mayer
    • 1
  1. 1.The Liver Unit QueenElizabeth HospitalEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations