Clinical Experience with a PACS Serving the Medical Intensive Care Unit at the University of Pennsylvania

  • Harold L. Kundel
  • Sridhar B. Seshadri
  • Ronald L. Arenson


Since 1985, a PACS has been in operation linking hospital Intensive Care Units with the Radiology Department. Periodic upgrades of equipment are accompanied by evaluations that measure access times, action times, and utilization. Despite a major improvement in the display station, there has been no increase in utilization. This is attributed to difficulties with optimizing the images that are displayed and a perceived need for face-to-face consultation with radiologists.


Radiology Department Medical Intensive Care Unit Display Station Intensive Care Unit Physician Computer Assist Radiology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    van der Voorde F, Arenson R, Kundel H, Miller W, et al. Development of a physician friendly digital image display console. Proc SPIE 1986; 626: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arenson RL, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL, et al. Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images. AJR 1988; 150: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeSimone DS, Kundel HL, Arenson RL, et al. Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit. Radiology 1988; 169: 41–44.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kundel HL, Seshadri SB, Arenson RL. Diagnostic value model for the evaluation of PACS: Physician ratings of the importance of prompt image access and the utilization of a display station in an intensive care unit. Proc SPIE 1991; 1446–42.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser printed, and high resolution workstation images. Radiology 1990; 174: 775–780.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foley WD, Jacobson DR, Taylor AJ, et al. Display of CT studies on a two screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: Sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists. Radiology 1990; 174: 769–773.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, et al. Digital chest radiography: Effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video and reversed gray scale video display formats. Radiology 1988; 168: 669–673.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nodine CF, Brikman I, Seshadri SB, et al. Image-display optimization using clinical history. Proc SPIE 1991; 1444–07.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold L. Kundel
    • 1
  • Sridhar B. Seshadri
    • 1
  • Ronald L. Arenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations