Skip to main content

Violations of the Classical Assumptions

  • Chapter
Econometrics
  • 316 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we relax the assumptions made in Chapter 3 one by one and study the effect of that on the OLS estimator. In case the OLS estimator is no longer a viable estimator, we derive an alternative estimator and propose some tests that will allow us to check whether this assumption is violated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ali, M.M. and C. Giaccotto (1984), “A study of Several New and Existing Tests for Heteroscedasticity in the General Linear Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 26: 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1973), “Regression Analysis When the Variance of the Dependent Variable is Proportional to the Square of its Expectation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68: 928–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1977), “A Note on a Heteroscedastic Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 6: 365–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. and Q. Li (1990), “The Heteroscedastic Consequences of an Arbitrary Variance for the Initial Disturbance of an AR(1) Model,” Econometric Theory, Problem 90.3.1, 6: 405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. and Q. Li (1992), “The Bias of the Standard Errors of OLS for an AR(1) Process with an Arbitrary Variance on the Initial Observations,” Econometric Theory, Problem 92.1.4, 8: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. and Q. Li (1995), “ML Estimation of Linear Regression Model with AR(1) Errors and Two Observations,” Econometric Theory, Solution 93.3.2, 11: 641–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M.S. (1937), “Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests,” Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 160: 268–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, C.M. and J.G. MacKinnon (1978), “A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Autocorrelated Errors,” Econometrica, 46: 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benderly, J. and B. Zwick (1985), “Inflation, Real Balances, Output and Real Stock Returns,” American Economic Review, 75: 1115–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S. (1978), “Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models,” Australian Economic Papers, 17: 334–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S. and A.R. Pagan (1979), “A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation,” Econometrica, 47: 1287–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse, A. (1984), “Tests for Additive Heteroskedasticity: Goldfeld and Quandt Revisited,” Empirical Economics, 9: 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, D. and G. Orcutt (1949), “Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Autocorrelated Error Terms,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44: 32–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. (1960), “Estimation of Parameters in Time-Series Regression Model,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 22: 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. and G. Watson (1950), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression-I,” Biometrika, 37: 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. and G. Watson (1951), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression-II,” Biometrika, 38: 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.A., and M.L. King (1980) “A Further Class of Tests for Heteroscedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 37: 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. (1980), “The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation When There is No Intercept in the Regression,” Econometrica, 48: 1553–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H. (1969), “A New Test for Heteroscedasticity,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64: 316–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L.G. (1978), “Testing Against General Autoregressive and Moving Average Error Models When the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables,” Econometrica, 46: 1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M. and R.E. Quandt (1965), “Some Tests for Homoscedasticity,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60: 539–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfeld, S.M. and R.E. Quandt (1972), Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics (North-Holland: Amsterdam). Harrison, M. and B.P. McCabe (1979), “A Test for Heteroscedasticity Based On Ordinary Least Squares Residuals,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74: 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.C. (1976), “Estimating Regression Models With Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity,” Econometrica, 44: 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilderth, C. and J. Lu (1960), “Demand Relations with Autocorrelated Disturbances,” Technical Bulletin 276 ( Michigan State University, Agriculture Experiment Station ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarque, C.M. and A.K. Bera (1987), “A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals,” International Statistical Review, 55: 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.H. (1991), “The Heteroscedastic Consequences of an Arbitrary Variance for the Initial Disturbance of an AR(1) Model,” Econometric Theory, Solution 90.3.1, 7: 544–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. (1981), “A Note on Studentizing a Test for Heteroscedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 17: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. and G.W. Bassett, Jr. (1982), “Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica, 50: 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koning, R.H. (1992), “The Bias of the Standard Errors of OLS for an AR(1) Process with an Arbitrary Variance on the Initial Observations,” Econometric Theory, Solution 92.1.4, 9: 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, W. (1982), “Note on Estimating Linear Trend When Residuals are Autocorrelated,” Econometrica, 50: 1065–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, W.F. and S.C. Ray (1992), Applied Econometrics: Problems With Data Sets ( The Dryden Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1977), Econometrics ( McGraw-Hill: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeshiro, A. (1976), “Autoregressive Transformation, Trended Independent Variables and Autocorrelated Disturbance Terms,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 58: 497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeshiro, A. (1979), “On the Retention of the First Observations in Serial Correlation Adjustment of Regression Models,” International Economic Review, 20: 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee L. (1993), “ML Estimation of Linear Regression Model with AR(1) Errors and Two Observations,” Econometric Theory, Problem 93.3.2, 9: 521–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhofer, W. and J. Kmenta (1974), “A General Procedure for Obtaining Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Generalized Regression Models,” Econometrica, 42: 579–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.E. and B.M. Mitchell (1980), “Estimating the Autocorrelated Error Model With Trended Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 13: 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. and C. Winsten (1954), “Trend Estimation and Serial Correlation,” Discussion Paper 383 ( Cowles Commission: Chicago ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. and Z. Griliches (1969), “Some Small Sample Properties of Several Two-Stage Regression Methods in the Context of Autocorrelated Errors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64: 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. and R. L. Miller (1971), Applied Econometrics ( Wadsworth: Belmont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutemiller, H.C. and D.A. Bowers (1968), “Estimation in a Heteroscedastic Regression Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 552–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin, N.E. and K.J. White (1977), “The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation with Extreme Sample Sizes or Many Regressors,” Econometrica, 45: 1989–1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szroeter, J. (1978), “A Class of Parametric Tests for Heteroscedasticity in Linear Econometric Models,” Econometrica, 46: 1311–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1978), Introduction to Econometrics (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D.M. (1983), “A Note on Algebraic Equivalence of White’s Test and a Variation of the Godfrey/Breusch-Pagan Test for Heteroscedasticity,” Economics Letters, 13: 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980), “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica, 48: 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baltagi, B.H. (1998). Violations of the Classical Assumptions. In: Econometrics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00516-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00516-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63617-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-00516-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics