Skip to main content

Power in Game Forms

  • Conference paper
Power, Voting, and Voting Power

Abstract

Power is often identified as the central concept in political science. Yet there is little scholarly consensus on how to define power, how to observe and measure it, or even how to think about it. Indeed, March [1966, p. 70] has concluded that “on the whole... power is a disappointing concept.”

Much of this essay is drawn from a paper presented to the 1978 Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, New Orleans, Louisiana. For helpful suggestions, I am indebted to several participants at that meeting, to my colleagues Louis Cantori, David Jacobs, and Christopher Kelly, and to the editor of this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New York 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, J.F. III.: Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis. Rutgers Law Review 19, 1965, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.: The Economic Approach to the Analysis of Power and Conflict. Government and Opposition 9, 1974, 189–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.: Power: An Economic Analysis. Power and Political Theory. Ed. by B. Barry. London 1976, 67–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.: Is It Better to be Powerful or Lucky? Political Studies 28, 1980, 183–194, and 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and M. Lake: Power and Satisfaction in a Representative Democracy. Game Theory and Political Science. Ed. by P.C. Ordeshook. New York 1978, 529–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.: Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act. Social Choice. Ed. by B. Lieberman. New York 1971, 269–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, J. Jr., and E.W. Packel: A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games. International Journal of Game Theory 7, 1979, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson, R.: Theory of Voting. New Haven 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica 41, 1973, 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I.: Toward a Theory of Social Power. Philosophical Studies 23, 1972, 221–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.: Measurement Concepts and the Theory of Influence. Journal of Politics 19, 1957, 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G.: The Power of Power. Varieties of Political Theory. Ed. by D. Easton. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966, 39–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.R.: ‘Social Preference’ and Game Theory: A Comment on ‘The Dilemma of a Paretian Liberal’. Public Choice 30, 1977, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D.W.: Political Democracy as a Property of Political Institutions. American Political Science Review 65, 1971, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D.W.: The Limits of Consensual Decision. American Political Science Review 69, 1975, 1270–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C.: The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy 78, 1970, 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S.: A Value for n-Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II. Ed. by H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker. Princeton 1953, 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S.: Simple Games: An Outline of the Descriptive Theory. Behavioral Science 7, 1962, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S., and M. Shubik: A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System. American Political Science Review 48, 1954, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P.D. Jr.: Power Indices in Politics. Modules in Applied Mathematics. Cornell University, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, R.H.: Equality. 4th ed., New York 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 3rd ed., Princeton 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.B.: A Revision of Arrow’s General Possibility Theorem. Working Paper No. 181. Stanford Business School, February 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.B.: The Game-Theoretic Structure of Arrow’s General Possibility Theorem. Journal of Economic Theory 5, 1972, 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Physica-Verlag, Würzburg (Germany)

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miller, N.R. (1981). Power in Game Forms. In: Holler, M.J. (eds) Power, Voting, and Voting Power. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00411-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00411-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00413-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-00411-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics