Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visualität und Internationale Beziehungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Visualität und Weltpolitik

Part of the book series: Horizonte der Internationalen Beziehungen ((HDIB))

  • 1386 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bilder und Dokumentationen menschlichen Leids, seien es Massaker, Hunger, Vertreibung oder die Zerstörung ganzer Dörfer und Städte sind wiederkehrende Begleiterscheinungen von Bürgerkriegen und internationalen Gewaltkonflikten. Diese Tatsache wurde zumindest in Teilen der Disziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen (IB) schon vor vielen Jahren anerkannt (Campbell 2003b, 2007; Hoskins und O’Loughlin 2010; Kennedy 2008). Visuelle Repräsentationen prägen nicht nur die kollektiv geteilten Vorstellungen von Krieg und dessen Folgen, sondern vermitteln oftmals darüber hinausweisende, politisch und normativ aufgeladene Narrative über Täter und Opfer eines Konflikts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adler-Nissen, R., Andersen, K. E. & Hansen, L. (2020). Images, emotions, and international politics. The death of Alan Kurdi. Review of International Studies 46 (1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210519000317

  • Agathangelou, A. M. & Ling, L. H. M. (2004). The House of IR. From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism1. International Studies Review 6 (4), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00448.x

  • Ahrens, J., Hieber, L. & Kautt, Y. (2014). Kampf um Images. Visuelle Kommunikation in gesellschaftlichen Konfliktlagen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C. & Huysmans, J. (2014). Critical methods in International Relations. The politics of techniques, devices and acts. European journal of international relations 20 (3), 596–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbehön, M., Münch, S. & Schlag, G. (2019). Interpretationen in der Politikwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 29 (2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-019-00188-1

  • Berger, J. (2015). About Looking. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildphilosophie, N. (2014). Bild und Methode. Theoretische Hintergründe und methodische Verfahren der Bildwissenschaft. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2001). The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 30 (3), 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2015). Pluralist methods for visual global politics. Millennium 43 (3), 872–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2018). Visual global politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. & Hutchison, E. (2008). Fear no more. Emotions and world politics. Review of International Studies 34 (S1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E. & Nicholson, X. (2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science 48 (4), 398–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, G. (1995). Was ist ein Bild? München: Fink Wilhelm GmbH + CompanyKG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogerts, L. K. (2016). Die Responsibility to Protest. Street Art als Waffe des Widerstands? Zeitschrift für Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik 9 (4), 503–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, H. (2010). Theorie des Bildakts: Suhrkamp Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, H., Schneider, B. & Dünkel, V. (2012). Das Technische Bild. Kompendium zu einer Stilgeschichte wissenschaftlicher Bilder. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, C. (1997). War and Photography: A Cultural History. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. T. (2012). “A Woman in the Army Is Still a Woman”. Representations of Women in US Military Recruiting Advertisements for the All-Volunteer Force. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 33 (2), 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska, M. (2012). Friedensforschung und Internationale Beziehungen–Lob der Verschiedenheit. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2002). Atrocity, memory, photography: Imaging the concentration camps of Bosnia-the case of ITN versus Living Marxism, Part 1. Journal of Human Rights 1 (1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2003a). Cultural governance and pictorial resistance. Reflections on the imaging of war. Review of International Studies 29 (S1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210503005977

  • Campbell, D. (2003b). Representing contemporary war. Ethics & International Affairs 17 (2), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2003c). Salgado and the Sahel: Documentary Photography and the Imaging of Famine. In F. Debrix & C. Weber (Hrsg.), Rituals of Mediation. International Politics and Social Meaning (S. 69–96). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2004). Horrific Blindness: Images of Death in Contemporary Media. Journal for Cultural Research 8 (1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758042000196971

  • Campbell, D. (2007). Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography 26 (4), 357–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Cunningham, D. (2019). Drawing Fear of Difference. Race, Gender, and National Identity in Ms. Marvel Comics. Millennium, 0305829819889133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crilley, R. (2016). Like and share forces. Making sense of military social media sites. In L. J. Shepherd & C. Hamilton (Hrsg.), Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age (S. 51–67). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, J. & Klonk, C. (2016). Image Operations. Visual Media and Political Conflict: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, J. (2013). Visual studies. A skeptical introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, S., Roepstorff, K. & Spencer, A. (2020). Visualizing Peace–The State of the Art. Peace & Change 45 (1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2015). The recruiter and the sceptic. A critical feminist approach to military studies. Critical Military Studies 1 (1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2014.961746

  • Erll, A. & Wodianka, S. (Hrsg.). (2008). Film und kulturelle Erinnerung: Plurimediale Konstellationen. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, S. & Kim, D. (2008). Picturing the Iraq War. Constructing the image of war in the British and US press. International Communication Gazette 70 (6), 443–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freistein, K. & Gadinger, F. (2019). Populist stories of honest men and proud mothers. A visual narrative analysis. Review of International Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210519000421

  • Gadinger, F., Ochoa, C. S. & Yildiz, T. (2019). Resistance or Thuggery? Political Narratives of Urban Riots. Narrative Culture 6 (1), 88–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. & Schlag, G. (2017). ‘The facts cannot be denied’: legitimacy, war and the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Global Discourse 7 (2–3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1288488

  • Geise, S. & Müller, M. (Hrsg.). (2015). Grundlagen der Visuellen Kommunikation. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. (2010). Media images of war. Media, War & Conflict 3 (1), 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (2000). The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium 29 (2), 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. (2011). Theorizing the image for Security Studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis*. European journal of international relations 17 (1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110388593

  • Hariman, R. & Lucaites, J. L. (2003). Public Identity and Collective Memory in US Iconic Photography: The Image of” Accidental Napalm”. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (1), 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. & Lucaites, J. L. (2007). No caption needed. Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, A. (2018). Visuality and Security. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. http://communication.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-624.

  • Heck, A. (2017a). Analyzing Docudramas in International Relations: Narratives in the Film A Murderous Decision. International Studies Perspectives 18 (4), 365–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, A. (2017b). Images, visions and narrative identity formation of ISIS. Global Discourse 7 (2–3), 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, A. (2019). Visual Communication and Security. In B. C. Taylor & H. Bean (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Communication and Security (203–222). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, A. (2020). “When the Battle’s Lost and Won:” Narratives of Peace in the Afghanistan Film A War. Peace & Change 45 (1), 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, A. & Schlag, G. (2013). Securitizing images. The female body and the war in Afghanistan. European journal of international relations 19 (4), 891–913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066111433896.

  • Hempel, L., Krasmann, S. & Bröckling, U. (2010). Sichtbarkeitsregime. Überwachung, Sicherheit und Privatheit im 21. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herborth, B. (2011). Methodenstreit–Methodenzwang–Methodenfetisch. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W. (Hrsg.). (2006). Bildpolitik, Sprachpolitik. Untersuchungen zur politischen Kommunikation in der entwickelten Demokratie. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A. (2004). Televising War: From Vietnam to Iraq. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, R. (2009). The Catwalk Power. Germany’s new foreign image policy. Journal of International Relations and Development 12 (3), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isermann, H. & Knieper, T. (2010). Bildethik. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienethik (S. 304–317). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetschke, A. & Liese, A. (1998). Kultur im Aufwind. Zur Rolle von Bedeutungen, Werten und Handlungsrepertoires in den internationalen Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 5 (H. 1), 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansteiner, W. (2009). Alternative Welten und erfundene Gemeinschaften: Geschichtsbewusstsein im Zeitalter interaktiver Medien. In E. Meyer (Hrsg.), Erinnerungskultur 2.0: Kommemorative Kommunikation in digitalen Medien (S. 29–54). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L. (2008). Securing vision. Photography and US foreign policy. Media, Culture & Society 30 (3), 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltermann, F. (2017). Fotoreporter im Konflikt. Der internationale Fotojournalismus in Israel/Palästina. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method. Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, A. (2008). Thinking Tools. In A. Klotz & D. Prakash (Hrsg.), Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide (S. 11–27). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_2.

  • Leifert, S. (2007). Bildethik. Theorie und Moral im Bildjournalismus der Massenmedien. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. & Cottle, S. (2009). Visualizing climate change: Television news and ecological citizenship. International journal of communication 3, 930–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linfield, S. (2011). The cruel radiance. Photography and political violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maar, C. & Burda, H. (Hrsg.). (2004). Iconic turn. Die neue Macht der Bilder. Köln: DuMont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielczarek, N. (2018). The dead Syrian refugee boy goes viral. Funerary Aylan Kurdi memes as tools of mourning and visual reparation in remix culture. Visual Communication, 1470357218797366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The Right to Look. Critical Inquiry 37 (3), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/659354

  • Mitchell, W. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S. D. (2002). Compassion Fatigue. How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, F. (2008). Imaging and remembering peace and war. Peace Review 20 (1), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, F. (2009). The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies 35 (4), 781–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, F. (2017). From Aftermath to Peace. Reflections on a Photography of Peace. Global Society 31 (3), 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, F. & Shim, D. (2019). Visions of Peace in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 20 (3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky014

  • Mortensen, M. (2017). Constructing, confirming, and contesting icons. The Alan Kurdi imagery appropriated by# humanitywashedashore, Ai Weiwei, and Charlie Hebdo. Media, Culture & Society 39 (8), 1142–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxey, K. (2008). Visual studies and the iconic turn. Journal of Visual Culture 7 (2), 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. B. (2002). Returning practice to the linguistic turn. The case of diplomacy. Millennium 31 (3), 627–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nexon, D. H. & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Harry Potter and international relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, T. (2017). Memetic protest and the dramatic diffusion of Alan Kurdi. Media, Culture & Society 40 (5), 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717729212

  • Onuf, N. G. (2012). World of our making. Rules and rule in social theory and international relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgad, S. (2013). Visualizers of solidarity. Organizational politics in humanitarian and international development NGOs. Visual Communication 12 (3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357213483057

  • Paul, G. (2004). Bilder des Krieges, Krieg der Bilder: Die Visualisierung des modernen Krieges. Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, H. & Reder, M. (2017). Ich schwöre euch, dieses Land in Syrien ist barakah, Segen pur. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 24 (2), 36–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, J. (2017). Visuelle Wissenssoziologie. Theoretische Konzeption und materiale Analysen. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2000). Die Transformation der Kulturtheorien. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reer, F., Sachs-Hombach, K. & Schahadat, S. (2015). Krieg und Konflikt in den Medien. Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven auf mediale Kriegsdarstellungen und deren Wirkungen: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, M. (2007). Picturing violence. Aesthetics and the anxiety of critique. In M. Reinhardt, H. Edwards & E. Duganne (Hrsg.), Beautiful suffering. Photography and the traffic in pain (S. 13–36). Williamstown: Williams College Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, M. (2012). Painful photographs. From the ethics of spectatorship to visual politics. In A. Gronstad & H. Gustafsson (Hrsg.), Ethics and images of pain (S. 57–80). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, G. (2016). Außenpolitik als Kultur. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, G. (2018). Moving Images and the Politics of Pity: A Multilevel Approach to the Interpretation of Images and Emotions. In M. Clément & E. Sangar (Hrsg.), Researching Emotions in International Relations: Methodological Perspectives on the Emotional Turn (S. 209–230). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_9.

  • Schlag, G. (2019). The afterlife of Osama bin Laden. Performative pictures in the “war on terror”. Critical Studies on Terrorism 12 (1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichte, K. (2012). Die Internationalen Beziehungen als Kirche, die Friedens-und Konfliktforschung als Sekte? Anmerkungen zur Disziplin. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J. (1988). The politics of representation: Writing practices in biography, photography, and policy analysis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. J. (1997). Violent cartographies: Mapping cultures of war. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, D. & Stengel, F. A. (2017). Social media, gender and the mediatization of war. Exploring the German armed forces’ visual representation of the Afghanistan operation on Facebook. Global Discourse 7 (2–3), 330–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2010). The Tabloid Terrorist. The Predicative Construction of New Terrorism in the Media. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strübel, M. (Hrsg.). (2002). Film und Krieg. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, M. & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switek, N. (2018). Politik in Fernsehserien. Analysen und Fallstudien zu House of Cards, Borgen & Co. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Munster, R. (2015). Inside war. Counterinsurgency and the visualization of violence. In C. Sylvest & R. van Munster (Hrsg.), Documenting World Politics (S. 128–146). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Veeren, E. (2018). The War on Terror is hard to see. The Imperial War Museum’s ‘Age of Terror’ exhibition and absence as curatorial practice. Critical Military Studies, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuori, J. & Saugmann, R. (2018). Visual security studies. Sights and spectacles of insecurity and war. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In S. Smith, K. Booth & M. Zalewski (Hrsg.), International Theory. Positivism and Beyond (S. 149–185). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. J. A. (2011). Ethics and the media. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldes, J. (1999). Going cultural: Star Trek, state action, and popular culture. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 28 (1), 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Clark, A. & Prosser, J. (2012). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In J. Hughes (Hrsg.), SAGE Visual Methods (Bd. 1, S. 329–356). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies. Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly 47 (4), 511–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (2010). About to Die. How News Images Move the Public. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland

    Axel Heck

  2. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland

    Gabi Schlag

Authors
  1. Axel Heck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabi Schlag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Heck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Gabi Schlag

  2. Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Axel Heck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heck, A., Schlag, G. (2020). Visualität und Internationale Beziehungen. In: Schlag, G., Heck, A. (eds) Visualität und Weltpolitik. Horizonte der Internationalen Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29971-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29971-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29970-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29971-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation