Skip to main content

Psychology and critique – forms of psychologization after 1945: An introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychologie und Kritik

Zusammenfassung

Current psychology has gone to hell – according to some critical voices from within the discipline, which find a forum in the critical science blog Neuroskeptic (2012). The reason for this infernal location is the replication crisis that seized psychology in 2011 and which has since then led to ever more far-reaching controversies about psychological research methods. No less dramatic is another current critique of psychology which takes a completely different direction: Critics such as the German legal expert and social scientist Albert Krölls (2016) currently argue that psychology is the ‘modern opium of the people’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ash, M. G. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. In L. Graham, W. Lepenies & P. Weingart (Eds.), Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories (pp. 143–189). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M., & Geuter, U. (Eds.) (1985). Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskman, L. B. (1972). Is a Kuhnian analysis applicable to psychology? Social Studies of Science, 2(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277200200103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capshew, J. H. (1999). Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R., Castel, F., & Lovell, A. (1982). Psychiatrisierung des Alltags. Produktion und Vermarktung der Psychowaren in den USA. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The Wellness Syndrome. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2014). Psychologization. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_247.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eitler, P., & Elberfeld, J. (2015). Von der Gesellschaftsgeschichte zur Zeitgeschichte des Selbst – und zurück. In P. Eitler & J. Elberfeld (Eds.), Zeitgeschichte des Selbst: Therapeutisierung, Politisierung, Emotionalisierung (pp. 7–30). Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). The Politics of Truth. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1987). The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuter, U. (2008). The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781– 795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp. 351–394). Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzer, B. (2011). Die Therapeutisierung der Gefühle. Eine Geschichte aus dem 20. Jahrhundert. Der Mensch. Zeitschrift für Salutogenese und anthropologische Medizin, 42/43(1+2), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., & DiGiuseppe, R. (2011). Cognitive theories of psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross, G. R. VandenBos & D. K. Freedheim (Eds.), History of Psychotherapy: Continuity and Change (pp. 203–241). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1976). Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis – The Expropriation of Health. London: Marion Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C. (2015). The dangers of radical self-love. openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/dangers-of-radical-selflove/.

  • Krölls, A. (2016): Kritik der Psychologie. Das moderne Opium des Volkes (3rd ed.). VSA-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (2017). A Burst of Light: And Other Essays. Mineola, New York: Ixia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück, H. E., & Guski-Leinwand, S. (2014). Geschichte der Psychologie: Strömungen, Schulen, Entwicklungen (7th ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasen, S., Elberfeld, J., Eitler, P., & Tändler, M. (Eds.) (2011): Das beratene Selbst. Zur Genealogie der Therapeutisierung in den ‚langen‘ Siebzigern. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, M. (2009). Einführung in die Kritische Psychologie. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, P. (1998). Kritische Psychologie. In S. Grubitzsch & K. Weber (Ed.), Psychologische Grundbegriffe. Ein Handbuch (pp. 292–297). Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Métraux, A. (1985). Der Methodenstreit und die Amerikanisierung der Psychologie in der Bundesrepublik 1950–1970. In M. Ash & U. Geuter (Eds.), Geschichte der Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Ein Überblick (pp. 225–251). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moane, G., & Sonn, C. (2014). Postcolonial psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7.

  • Neuroskeptic (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives of Psychological Sciences, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519.

  • Palermo, D. S. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Social Studies of Science, 1(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277100100202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penny, L. (2016). Life-hacks of the poor and aimless. The Baffler, https://thebaffler.com/war-ofnerves/ laurie-penny-self-care.

  • Perrez, M. (1979). Ist die Psychoanalyse eine Wissenschaft? (2nd ed.). Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1998). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., & Palmary, I. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of International Feminisms: Perspectives on Psychology, Women, Culture, and Rights. New York: Springer SBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieben, A., & Scholz, J. (2012). (Queer-)Feministische Psychologien. Eine Einführung. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2013). Between Mind and Nature: A History of Psychology. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tändler, M. (2016). Das therapeutische Jahrzehnt. Der Psychoboom in den siebziger Jahren. Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2005). The Critique of Psychology: From Kant to Postcolonial Theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2011). The Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, W. B., & Palermo, D. S. (1973). Paradigms and normal science in psychology. Social Studies of Science, 3(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277300300301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willy, R. (1899). Die Krisis in der Psychologie. Leipzig: O.R. Reisland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Malich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malich, L., Balz, V. (2020). Psychology and critique – forms of psychologization after 1945: An introduction. In: Balz, V., Malich, L. (eds) Psychologie und Kritik. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29485-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29486-1

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics