Zusammenfassung
Current psychology has gone to hell – according to some critical voices from within the discipline, which find a forum in the critical science blog Neuroskeptic (2012). The reason for this infernal location is the replication crisis that seized psychology in 2011 and which has since then led to ever more far-reaching controversies about psychological research methods. No less dramatic is another current critique of psychology which takes a completely different direction: Critics such as the German legal expert and social scientist Albert Krölls (2016) currently argue that psychology is the ‘modern opium of the people’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ash, M. G. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. In L. Graham, W. Lepenies & P. Weingart (Eds.), Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories (pp. 143–189). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ash, M., & Geuter, U. (Eds.) (1985). Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Briskman, L. B. (1972). Is a Kuhnian analysis applicable to psychology? Social Studies of Science, 2(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277200200103.
Bühler, K. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Capshew, J. H. (1999). Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Castel, R., Castel, F., & Lovell, A. (1982). Psychiatrisierung des Alltags. Produktion und Vermarktung der Psychowaren in den USA. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The Wellness Syndrome. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
De Vos, J. (2014). Psychologization. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_247.
Eitler, P., & Elberfeld, J. (2015). Von der Gesellschaftsgeschichte zur Zeitgeschichte des Selbst – und zurück. In P. Eitler & J. Elberfeld (Eds.), Zeitgeschichte des Selbst: Therapeutisierung, Politisierung, Emotionalisierung (pp. 7–30). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324.
Foucault, M. (2007). The Politics of Truth. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
Gardner, H. (1987). The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Geuter, U. (2008). The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781– 795.
Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp. 351–394). Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.
Hitzer, B. (2011). Die Therapeutisierung der Gefühle. Eine Geschichte aus dem 20. Jahrhundert. Der Mensch. Zeitschrift für Salutogenese und anthropologische Medizin, 42/43(1+2), 17–20.
Hollon, S. D., & DiGiuseppe, R. (2011). Cognitive theories of psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross, G. R. VandenBos & D. K. Freedheim (Eds.), History of Psychotherapy: Continuity and Change (pp. 203–241). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
Illich, I. (1976). Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis – The Expropriation of Health. London: Marion Boyars.
Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
King, C. (2015). The dangers of radical self-love. openDemocracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/dangers-of-radical-selflove/.
Krölls, A. (2016): Kritik der Psychologie. Das moderne Opium des Volkes (3rd ed.). VSA-Verlag.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 308–318.
Lorde, A. (2017). A Burst of Light: And Other Essays. Mineola, New York: Ixia.
Lück, H. E., & Guski-Leinwand, S. (2014). Geschichte der Psychologie: Strömungen, Schulen, Entwicklungen (7th ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Maasen, S., Elberfeld, J., Eitler, P., & Tändler, M. (Eds.) (2011): Das beratene Selbst. Zur Genealogie der Therapeutisierung in den ‚langen‘ Siebzigern. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Markard, M. (2009). Einführung in die Kritische Psychologie. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.
Mattes, P. (1998). Kritische Psychologie. In S. Grubitzsch & K. Weber (Ed.), Psychologische Grundbegriffe. Ein Handbuch (pp. 292–297). Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Métraux, A. (1985). Der Methodenstreit und die Amerikanisierung der Psychologie in der Bundesrepublik 1950–1970. In M. Ash & U. Geuter (Eds.), Geschichte der Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Ein Überblick (pp. 225–251). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144.
Moane, G., & Sonn, C. (2014). Postcolonial psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7.
Neuroskeptic (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives of Psychological Sciences, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519.
Palermo, D. S. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Social Studies of Science, 1(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277100100202.
Penny, L. (2016). Life-hacks of the poor and aimless. The Baffler, https://thebaffler.com/war-ofnerves/ laurie-penny-self-care.
Perrez, M. (1979). Ist die Psychoanalyse eine Wissenschaft? (2nd ed.). Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna: Huber.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., & Palmary, I. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of International Feminisms: Perspectives on Psychology, Women, Culture, and Rights. New York: Springer SBM.
Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237.
Sieben, A., & Scholz, J. (2012). (Queer-)Feministische Psychologien. Eine Einführung. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag.
Smith, R. (2013). Between Mind and Nature: A History of Psychology. London: Reaktion Books.
Tändler, M. (2016). Das therapeutische Jahrzehnt. Der Psychoboom in den siebziger Jahren. Göttingen: Wallstein.
Teo, T. (2005). The Critique of Psychology: From Kant to Postcolonial Theory. New York: Springer.
Vidal, F. (2011). The Sciences of the Soul: The Early Modern Origins of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weimer, W. B., & Palermo, D. S. (1973). Paradigms and normal science in psychology. Social Studies of Science, 3(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277300300301.
Willy, R. (1899). Die Krisis in der Psychologie. Leipzig: O.R. Reisland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malich, L., Balz, V. (2020). Psychology and critique – forms of psychologization after 1945: An introduction. In: Balz, V., Malich, L. (eds) Psychologie und Kritik. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29485-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29486-1
eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)