Zusammenfassung
Die angelsächsische Perspektive auf die Topoi „Frieden durch Recht“ und „rechtserhaltende Gewalt“ ist facettenreich und weist unterschiedliche Dimensionen auf. Relevante Diskurse betreffen zum einen das innerstaatliche Recht (2.), zum anderen fokussieren sie sich auf das Völkerrecht (3.). Letzterem soll hier das Hauptaugenmerk geschenkt werden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Albright, Madeleine. 1993. UN Security Council Adopts Resolution 808 on War Crimes Tribunal. 4 US Dept. of St. Dispatch No. 12, Art. 5, 22. März 1993.
Bingham, Tom. 2010. The Rule of Law. London: Allen Lane.
Brooks, Rosa. 2012. Strange Bedfellows: The Convergence of Sovereignty-Limiting Doctrines in Counterterrorist and Human Rights Discourse. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 2: 125–133.
Cerone, John P. 2007. Dynamic Equilibrium: The Evolution of US Attitudes toward International Criminal Courts and Tribunals. European Journal of International Law 18 (2): 277–315.
Chesterman, Simon. 2008. An International Rule of Law? American Journal on Comparative Law 56 (2): 331–362.
Daase, Christoph. 2013. Die Legalisierung der Legitimität - Zur Kritik der Schutzverantwortung als emerging norm. Friedens-Warte: 41–62.
Deng, Francis. 1993. Protecting the Dispossessed. Washington. DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Dobbins, James F., John G. McGinn, Keith Crane, Seth G. Jones, Rollie Lal, Andrew Rathmell, Rachel M. Swanger und Anga R. Timilsina. 2003. America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa Monica, CAL: RAND Corporation.
Eberl, Oliver und Andreas Fischer-Lescano. 2005. Grenzen demokratischen Rechts? HSFK-Report 8/2005. Frankfurt: HSFK.
Edling, Max M. 2018. Peace Pact and Nation: An International Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. Past and Present 240: 267–303.
Ferstman, Carla, Thomas Obel Hansen und Noora Arajärvi. 2018. Efforts and Prospect for Accountability for International Crimes Allegations? Essex: University of Essex.
Fuller, Lon L.. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Golove, David. 2002. Human Rights Treaties and the U.S. Constitution. DePaul Law Review 52: 579–626.
Haass, Richard. 2003. Sovereignty: Existing Rights, Evolving Responsibilities. https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/p/rem/2003/16648.htm. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Henderson, Christian. 2010. The 2010 United States National Security Strategy and the Obama Doctrine of ‚Necessary Force‘. Journal of Conflict & Security Law 15 (3): 403–434.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. London: Andrew Crooke.
Howe, Samuel R. 2019. Congress’s War Powers and the Political Question Doctrine after Smith v. Obama. Duke Law Journal 68 (6): 1231–1276.
Independent International Commission on Kosovo. 2010. Kosovo Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect 2001. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS/20Report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Jacobs, Jennifer. 2018. Trump says U.S. will react to Syria Attack “Forcefully”, Bloomberg, 9. April 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-09/trump-national-security-advisers-are-said-tomeet-on-syria. Zugegriffen: 21. Oktober 2019.
Letter dated 20 March 2003 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council. 2003. UN Doc S/2003/351.
Locke, John. 1690 [1689]. Two Treatises of Government. London: Awnsham and Churchill.
Mertus, Julie. 2000. Reconsidering the legality of humanitarian intervention: Lessons from Kosovo. William & Mary Law Review 41: 1743–1787.
Mills, Claire. 2018. Parliamentary approval for military action. CBP 7166 vom 8. Mai 2018.
Mitrany, David. 1933. The Progress of International Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Obama, Barack. 2009. Barack Obama’s Nobel Remarks. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/world/europe. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Obama, Barack. 2011. ‘Remarks by the president in address to the nation on Libya’, 28 March 2011. Washington DC: White House). www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/28/remarks-president-address-nationlibya. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Orentlicher, Diane F. 2004. Unilateral Multilateralism: United States Policy toward the International Criminal Court. Cornell International Law Journal 36 (3): 415–433.
Pei, Minxin. 2003. The Paradoxes of American Nationalism. Foreign Policy 2003: 30–37.
Potter, Pitman B. 1922. An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Rule of Law and its Virtue. In The Authority of Law, hrsg. von Joseph Raz, 210–229. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Reinsch, Paul S. 1907. International Unions and their Administration. American Journal of International Law 1 (3): 579–623.
Reisman, W. Michael. 1985. Criteria for the lawful use of force in international law. Faculty Scholarship Series 1985: 278–285.
Report of the Iraq Inquiry (Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors). 2016. Chilcot Inquiry. http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2005. Liberal Hierarchy and the Licence to Use Force. Review of International Studies 31: 71–92.
Rhyne, Charles S. 1958. World Peace Through Law: The President’s Annual Address. American Bar Association Journal 44 (10): 937–941, 997–1001.
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1904. Annual Message to Congress, 6. Dezember 1904. www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=56&page=transcript. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Secretaries of State and War and the Attorney General. 1945. „Yalta Memorandum“ gerichtet an Präsident Roosevelt. www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/jackson/jack01.htm. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs 76: 183–187.
Starski, Paulina. 2015. Right to Self-Defence, Attribution and the Non-State Actor – Birth of the “Unable and Unwilling” Standard? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht 75: 455–502.
Starski, Paulina. 2017. The Silent State and Normative Dynamics of the Prohibition on the Use of Force – Legislative Responsibility in Situations of Enhanced Normative Volatility. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4 (1): 1–43.
Starski, Paulina und Leander Beinlich. 2018. Der Amtshaftungsanspruch und Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr. Eine verfassungsrechtliche und rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung aus Anlass des Kunduz-Urteils des Bundesgerichtshofs. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 66: 299–336.
Stephens, Beth, Judith Chomsky, Jennifer Green, Paul Hoffmann und Michael Ratner. 2008. International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
The Cabinet Manual. 2011. Rn. 5.38. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/60641/cabinet-manual.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
UN-Generalsekretär. 2005. Report of the Secretary-General. In Larger Freedom: Toward Development, Security and Human Rights for All. UN Doc. A/59/2005.
UNSC Provisional Records. 2017. 72nd year, 7919th meeting, 7. April 2017. S/PV.7919.
Walzer, Michael. 1980. The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics. Philosophy & Public Affairs 9 (3): 209–229.
Weed, Matthew C. 2017. The War Powers Resolution: Concepts and Practice. 28. März 2017. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=799956. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
White House. 2010. The National Security Strategy: May 2010. Washington, DC. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17. Mai 2019.
World Summit Outcome Document. 2005. GA A/RES/60/1.
Rechtsakte
Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–40, 115 Stat. 224.
Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). 2002. Pub. L. No. 107–243, 116 Stat. 1498.
War Powers Resolution. 1973. 50 U.S.C. 1541–1548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Starski, P. (2020). Frieden durch Recht im Lichte unterschiedlicher Rechtstraditionen. In: Jäger, S., Heinz, W. (eds) Frieden durch Recht – Rechtstraditionen und Verortungen. Gerechter Frieden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28715-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28715-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28714-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28715-3
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)