Skip to main content

Constructing Appropriate Information in School Transition. Documents as Institutional Agents of Topicalising Children’s (In)Capabilities and Pedagogical Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, I investigate how school transition documentation, in addition to recording issues, also actively constructs ideas about the topical information, roles and responsibilities and, consequently, institutional reality in school transition. In a transition phase, documentation has a great potential serve as a tool for ensuring the continuity in pedagogical practices. However, documentation is often found to focus on illustrating subjectifying and problem-oriented pictures of children and their incapabilities instead of explicating pedagogical practices and professional responsibilities in transition. In this chapter, I utilise the discursive approach to analyse the ready-set transition document forms from two Finnish municipalities and filled school transition documents of 43 pre-primary aged children (N = 43). In Finnish regulations, it is stated that all the appropriate information needs to be transferred to school prior the transition. Consequently, I analyse what kind of understanding about this appropriate information municipal document forms and teachers’ writings reflect. In addition to investigating the contents, I analyse how the roles and responsibilities of children, parents, and teachers as well as pre-primary and primary school institutions are presented in relation to school transition. As a theoretical starting point, I apply documentality theory introduced by Ferraris.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainscow, M. 2000. Reaching out to all learners: Some lessons from international experience. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 11(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M. 2014. Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education. Childhood 21(2): 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M., A.-M. Markström, and A.-C. Vallberg-Roth. 2014. Assessment and documentation in early childhood education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M., and A.-M. Markström. 2011. The making of the ordinary child in preschool. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55(5): 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M., and K. Karila. 2010. Framing the Picture of the Child. Children & Society 24(2): 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, M., and H. Kelle. 2015. Documentation in childhood. Children & Society 29(3): 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasson, I., and M. Asplund Carlsson. 2013. Individual educational plans in Swedish schools—forming identity and governing functions in pupils’ documentation. International Journal of Special Education 28(3): 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asp-Onsjö, L. 2006. Åtgärdsprogram – dokument eller verktyg? En fallstudie i en kommun. [The individual education plan – Document or tool?]. Doctoral dissertation. Göteborg: Doktorsavhandling Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic Education Act 628/1998. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628. Accessed: 1 September 2019.

  • Broström, S., J. Einarsdottir, and K. Vrinioti. 2010. Transitions from preschool to primary school. In Transition From Pre-school To School: Emphasing Early Literacys—Comments and Reflections by Researchers From Eight European Countries, ed. M. Hartmut, 16–20. Cologne: EU-Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B., T. McLaughlin, K. Derby, and J. Blecher. 2009. Teaching preschool children with autism and developmental delays to write. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 7(1): 225–238. http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english/index.php. Accessed: 29 April 2019.

  • Daniels, H. 2006. The dangers of corruption in special needs education. British Journal of Special Education 33(1): 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., and P. Perry. 2007. The role of schools and communities in children’s school transition. Encyclopaedia on Early Childhood Development. Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/46718631/DockettPerryANGxp.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1557092054&Signature=MQl5k8Wqm31HcBicWykn%2F9Cl7F4%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DThe_Role_of_Schools_and_Communities_in_C.pd. Accessed 1 September 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfström Pettersson, K. 2018. How a template for documentation in Swedish preschool systematic quality work produces qualities. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 20(2): 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, H., and A.-W. Dunlop. 2006. Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007: Strong foundations: early childhood care and education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000147463. Accessed: 29 May 2019.

  • Ferraris, M. 2013. Documentality: why it is necessary to leave traces. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FNBE (Finnish National Board of Education). 2014a. National Core Curriculum for Pre-Primary Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • FNBE (Finnish National Board of Education). 2014b. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, N. 2019. Children’s needs for support and support measures in the pedagogical documents of early childhood education and care. Doctoral dissertation. Jyväskylä University Printing House: Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, N., M. Alasuutari, and T. Vehkakoski. 2019. Intertextual voices of children, parents, and specialist in individual education plans. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1650825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, N., M. Alasuutari, and T. Vehkakoski. 2018. Positioning children with special educational needs in early childhood education and care documents. British Journal of Sociology of Education 39(6): 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High, P. C., and the Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care & Council on School Health. 2008. School Readiness. Pediatrics 121(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0079.

  • Hirvonen, P. 2016. Positioning theory and small-group interaction: Social and task positioning in the context of joint decision-making, 1–15. SAGE Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjörne, E., and R. Säljö. 2014. Analysing and preventing school failure: Exploring the role of multi-professionality in pupil health team meetings. International Journal of Educational Research 63: 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjörne, E., and R. Säljö. 2008. Categorizing learners beyond the classroom. In Encyclopedia of language and education, 2. ed., vol. 3: Discourse and education. Netherlands, eds. M. Martin-Jones, A. M. de Mejia, and N. H. Hornberger, 135–146. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karila, K., and M. Alasuutari. 2012. Drawing partnership on paper: how do the forms for individual education plans frame parent—teacher relationship? International Journal about Parents in Education 6(1): 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, H., R. Seehaus, and S. Bollig. 2015. Child health records as socio-material instruments of distributing responsibility. A comparative analysis of paediatric documents from Austria, England and Germany. Children & Society 29(3): 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, H., and A. Schweda. 2014. Interactional complexity and child performative knowledge in language assessments for entry to school. In Performativity in Education: An International Collection of Ethnographic Research on Learners’ Experiences, eds. A. Rasmussen, J. Gustafsson, and B. Jeffrey, 213–238. E&E Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauf, H. 2017. Documentation as a tool for participation in German early childhood education and care. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 25(1): 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, J. S. 2018. Written communication with families during the transition from childcare to school: how documents construct and position children, professionals, and parents. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 26(2): 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2018.1442044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljestrand, J., and A. Hammarberg. 2017. The social construction of the competent, self-governed child in documentation: Panels in the Swedish preschool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 18(1): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, A.-L. 2012. Ethical Issues in Pedagogical Documentation: Representations of Children Through Digital Technology. International Journal of Early Childhood 44(3): 327– 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfdahl, A., and H. Pérez Prieto. 2009. Institutional narratives within the performative preschool in Sweden: ‘if we write that we’re no good, that’s not good publicity!’. Early Years 29(3): 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, K. L., and R. M. Clifford. 2004. School readiness assessment. Young Children 59(1): 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., V. A. Buysse, and E. Soukakou. 2011. Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention 33(4): 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parding, K., and A. Liljegren. 2016. Individual development plans as governance tools—Changed governance of teachers’ work. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61(6): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. 2008. Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology 42(5): 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rous, B., C. T. Meyers, and S. B. Stricklin. 2007. Strategies for supporting transition of young children with special needs and their families. Journal of Early Intervention 30(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severinsson, S. 2016. Documentation for students in residential care: Network of relations of human and non-human actants. International Journal of Inclusive Education 20(9): 921–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severinsson, S. 2017. Documentation of education for teenagers in residential care: A network of blame and critique. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25(2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. 2014. Document acts. In Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents. Contributions to Social Ontology (Philosophcal Studies Series), eds. A. Konzellmann-Ziv, and H. B. Schmid. 19–31. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham: Alta-Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, K. L. 2006. Measuring school readiness: Conceptual and practical considerations. Early Education and Development 17(1): 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, F., and A. Gálvez. 2007. Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8(2). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702317. Accessed: 29 May 2019.

  • UNICEF. 2012. School readiness. A conceptual framework. https://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/files/Child2Child_ConceptualFramework_FINAL(1).pdf. Accessed: 1 April 2019.

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C., and A. Månsson. 2009. Regulated childhood: Equivalence with variation. Early Years 29(2): 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, M. 2009. A critical examination of school-based occupational therapy collaborative consultation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 76 (Influencing Policy Special Issue): 206–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, M., C. Chatenoud, N. L. Hutchinson, P. Minnes, A. Perry, C. Dionne, E. B. Frankel, B. Isaacs, A. Loh, J. Versnel, and J. Weiss. 2013. The experience of parents as their children with developmental disabilities transition from early intervention to kindergarten. Canadian Journal of Education 36(1): 4–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2003. Paranoia, ambivalence, and discursive practices: Concepts of position and positioning in psychoanalysis and discursive psychology. In The self and others. Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts, eds. R. Harré, and F. M. Moghaddam, 99–120. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noora Heiskanen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heiskanen, N. (2020). Constructing Appropriate Information in School Transition. Documents as Institutional Agents of Topicalising Children’s (In)Capabilities and Pedagogical Practices. In: Alasuutari, M., Kelle, H., Knauf, H. (eds) Documentation in Institutional Contexts of Early Childhood. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28193-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28193-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28192-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28193-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics