Abstract
Opinions concerning the effects of digital and social media on the civic sphere have tended to swing between euphoria and despair: initially depicted as a democratizing force due to their capacity to allow diverse groups of citizens to organize towards shared causes, the focus has shifted to how such technologies contribute to a fragmented, polarized and contentious public sphere. In this chapter, I outline these changes and examine how they informed research on the civic role of schools. Specifically, I argue that within the optimistic view schools were (implicitly) conceptualized as artificial aberrations from the natural and authentic ways in which children develop into civic actors in digital contexts, whereas the pessimistic view perceived schools as safe havens—sites for the cultivation of skills needed to navigate the „digital jungle“. Rather than arguing for one approach over the other, I identify their shared assumptions, which shape and limit current debates concerning civics and schools. First, the emphasis on rapid and extreme shifts in modes of civic participation position schools as constantly lacking to keep up with external developments. Second, the dichotomous view of schools and the civic sphere results in presenting schools as an artificial counter to the natural development of technologically-mediated civic participation. Finally, schools are commonly conceptualized as sites for the development of skills needed for civic participation, while largely overlooking their normative role.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term “civic education” is often associated with the traditional knowledge-centered curriculum. For this reason, many researchers use the terms “citizenship education” or “education for citizenship” when describing contemporary interest in a more holistic approach. As this chapter covers multiple approaches to the civic role of schools, for the sake of clarity I will use the term “civic education” throughout the chapter.
References
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons‐based peer production and virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
Ben-Porath, S. (2013). Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. Theory and Research in Education, 11(2), 111–128.
Bliuc, A. M., Faulkner, N., Jakubowicz, A., & McGarty, C. (2018). Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 75–86.
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Carpentier, N. (2009). Participation is not enough: The conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices. European Journal of Communication, 24(4), 407–420.
Dewey, J. (1916/2001). Democracy and education. Hazleton, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Dishon G. (2019). The student and the situation: Situationism, schooling and the cultivation of virtues. In M. A. Dilhac, C. MacLeod and C. Tappolet (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Moral and Civic Education: Shaping Citizens. UK: Routledge.
Dishon, G., & Ben-Porath, S. (2018). Don’t@ me: rethinking digital civility online and in school. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(4), 434–450.
Dishon, G., & Kafai, Y. (2019). Connected civic gaming: rethinking the role of video games in civic education. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1704791
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292.
Fung, A., & Shkabatur, J. (2015). Viral engagement: Fast, cheap, and broad, but good for democracy? In D. Allen & J. S. Light (Eds.), From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age (pp. 155–177). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234.
Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The persistence of presentism. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2505–2534.
Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action (A white paper on the digital and media literacy recommendations of the knight commission on the information needs of communities in a democracy). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Hodgin, E. (2016). Educating Youth for Online Civic and Political Dialogue: A Conceptual Framework for the Digital Age. Journal of Digital and Media Literacy, 4(1).
Ito, M., Soep, E., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., & Zimmerman, A. (2015). Learning connected civics: Narratives, practices, infrastructures. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(1), 10–29.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU press.
Jenkins, H. (2016). Youth voice, media, and political engagement. In H. Jenkins, S. Shresthova, L. Gamber-Thompson, N. Kligler-Vilenchik, & A. Zimmerman (Eds.), By any media necessary: The new youth activism (pp. 1–60). New York, NY: NYU Press.
Jungherr, A., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2019). Digital Media and the Surge of Political Outsiders: Explaining the Success of Political Challengers in the United States, Germany, and China. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119875439.
Journell, W. (2017). Fake news, alternative facts, and Trump: Teaching social studies in a post-truth era. Social studies journal, 37(1), 8–21.
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2019). Can media literacy education increase digital engagement in politics? Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 211–224.
Kahne, J., Hodgin, E., & Eidman-Aadahl, E. (2016). Redesigning civic education for the digital age: Participatory politics and the pursuit of democratic engagement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(1), 1–35.
Kahne, J., Ullman, J., & Middaugh, E. (2012). Digital opportunities for civic education. Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation, 207–228.
Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2016). Mechanisms of translation: From online participatory cultures to participatory politics. Journal of Digital and Media Literacy, 4(1–2).
Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259.
Labaree, D. F. (2010). Someone has to Fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lawy, R., & Biesta, G. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British journal of educational studies, 54(1), 34–50.
Levinson, M. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loos, E., Ivan, L., & Leu, D. (2018). “Save the Pacific Northwest tree octopus”: a hoax revisited. Or: How vulnerable are school children to fake news? Information and Learning Science, 119(9/10), 514–528.
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193.
Middaugh, E. (2019). More Than Just Facts: Promoting Civic Media Literacy in the Era of Outrage. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 17–31.
Mihailidis, P. (2018). Civic media literacies: re-Imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–164.
Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in “post-fact” society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441–454.
Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2017). Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 136–158.
Morozov, E. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy, 19(05).
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Malden, MA: Polity.
Payne, K. A., & Journell, W. (2019). “We have those kinds of conversations here…”: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 73–82.
Schleicher, A. (2015). Schools for 21st-Century Learners: Strong Leaders, Confident Teachers, Innovative Approaches. International Summit on the Teaching Profession. OECD Publishing.
Soep, E. (2014). Participatory politics: Next-generation tactics to remake public spheres. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stevens, R., Gilliard-Matthews, S., Dunaev, J., Woods, M. K., & Brawner, B. M. (2016). The digital hood: Social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media & Society, 1461444815625941.
Stornaiuolo, A., & Thomas, E. E. (2017). Disrupting educational inequalities through youth digital activism. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 337–357.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills.: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.
Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: social media and democracy. Journal of democracy, 28(4), 46–59.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Journal on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 13: 203–217.
Westheimer, J. (2019). Civic Education and the Rise of Populist Nationalism. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 4–16.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American educational research journal, 41(2), 237–269.
Zimmerman, A. M. (2011). A dream detained: Undocumented Latino youth and the DREAM movement. NACLA Report on the Americas, 44(6), 14–17.
Zuckerman, E. (2016). Effective Civics. In E. Gordon & P. Mihailidis (Eds.), Civic media: Technology, design, practice (pp. 49–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dishon, G. (2020). Aberrations or Safe Havens? Civics and Schools in the Digital Age. In: Binder, U., Drerup, J. (eds) Demokratieerziehung und die Bildung digitaler Öffentlichkeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28169-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28169-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28168-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28169-4
eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)