Advertisement

„Care“ praxeologisch – Vom Einfluss praxistheoretischer Ansätze und Konzepte auf die empirische Untersuchung gesellschaftlicher Praxisfelder

  • Michael JonasEmail author
Chapter
  • 410 Downloads
Part of the Vallendarer Schriften der Pflegewissenschaft book series (VSP, volume 4)

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff der Praxeologie macht darauf aufmerksam, dass praxistheoretische Forschung nicht nur auf theoretische Konzepte zugreift, sondern auch über elaborierte methodologische Grundlagen sowie Methoden und Techniken der Sozialforschung verfügen muss, um ihren jeweiligen Forschungsgegenstand, die gesellschaftliche Praxis, adäquat erfassen zu können (Jonas et al. 2017). Praxeologische Forschung bewegt sich in einem Spannungsfeld, das zwischen drei zentralen ‚Eckpunkten‘ aufgespannt wird. Diese Punkte oder Pole lassen sich mit den Begriffen ‚theoretische Ansätze und Konzepte‘, ‚methodologische und methodische Aspekte‘ sowie ‚Aspekte des Praxisfeldes‘ bezeichnen (vgl. Hirschauer 2008).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. (1980): Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  2. Alkemeyer, Thomas, Nikolaus Buschmann, Matthias Michaeler (2017): Critique in praxis: arguments for a subjectivation theoretical expansion on practice theory. pp. 67-84. In: Jonas, Michael, Beate Littig (eds.) (2017): Praxeological Political Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, Walter (1983): Das Passagen-Werk. Bd. 1 und 2. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, Herbert (1969): Symbolic Interactionism, Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Practice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bohnsack, Ralf (2011): Qualitative Bild- und Videointerpretation. Einführung in die dokumentarische Methode. Opladen: Barbara Budrich/UTB.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre (1976): Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre (1990): The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Breidenstein, Georg, Stefan Hirschauer, Herbert Kalthoff, Boris Nieswand (2011): Analytische Ethnografie – Die Praxis der Feldforschung. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, Judith (1990): Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, Adele (2005): Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, S. D. Noam, Hendrik Wagenaar (2012): Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present: Toward an Epistemology of Practice. The American Review of Public Administration 42(1): 3-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, Bethan (2005): Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistic 9(4): 557-581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Certeau, Michel (1980) L’invention du quotidian. 1 – Arts de faire. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions.Google Scholar
  14. de Lait, Marianne (2017): Personal Metrics: Methodological Considerations of a Praxiographical Approach. Pp. 107-126. In: Jonas, Michael, Beate Littig, Andrea Wroblewski (eds.) (2017): Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel (1989): Der Gebrauch der Lüste. Sexualität und Wahrheit 2. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, Nancy, Axel Honneth (2003): Redistribution or Recognition? A Political Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, Richard (2008): Learning by Meeting. Critical Policy Analysis 2(1): 1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geertz, Clifford (1987): Dichte Beschreibung. Bemerkung zu einer deutenden Theorie von Kultur. S. 7-43. In: ders.: Dichte Beschreibung – Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, Anthony (1979): Central Problems of Social Theory. Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: The MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, Barney G. (1992): Emergence in forcing Basics of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Glaser, Barney G., Anselm L. Strauss (1967): The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  22. Gregson, Nicky, Alan Metcalfe, Louise Crewe (2009): Practices of Object Maintenance and Repair – How consumers attend to consumer objects within the home. Journal of Consumer Culture 9 (2): 248-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habermas, Jürgen (1984): The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1 & 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hand, Martin, Elizabeth Shove (2007): Condensing Practices – Ways of living with a freezer. Journal of Consumer Culture 7 (1): 79-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidegger, Martin (1967): Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  26. Hirschauer, Stefan (1999): Die Praxis der Fremdheit und die Minimierung von Anwesenheit. Eine Fahrstuhlfahrt. Soziale Welt 49: 221-246.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschauer, Stefan (2001): Ethnografisches Schreiben und die Schweigsamkeit des Sozialen – Zu einer Methodologie der Beschreibung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 30: 429-451.Google Scholar
  28. Hirschauer, Stefan (2008): Die Empiriegeladenheit von Theorien und der Erfindungsreichtum der Praxis. S. 165-187. In: Kalthoff, Herbert, Stefan Hirschauer, Gesa Lindemann (Hg.): Theoretische Empirie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  29. Hitzler, Ronald, Anne Honer (Hrsg.) (1997): Sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik. Eine Einführung. Leske + Budrich, Opladen 1997.Google Scholar
  30. Honer, Anne, Ronald Hitzler (2015): Life-World-Analytical Ethnography: A Phenomenology-Based Research Approach. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44(5): 544-562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonas, Michael (2014a): Zur Inszenierung eines Wirtschaftscluster – eine praxeologische Analyse. Springer VS: Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  32. Jonas, Michael (2014b): The Dortmund case – on the enactment of an urban economic imaginary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(6): 2123-2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jonas, Michael (2016): Nachhaltigkeit und Konsum – eine praxissoziologische Kritik. S. 345-363. In: Schäfer, Hilmar (Hg.): Praxistheorie – Ein soziologisches Forschungsprogramm. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  34. Jonas, Michael (2019): On the Enactment of Roundabout Art – A Praxeological Analysis. City & Community, 18(1): 128-150.Google Scholar
  35. Jonas, Michael, Beate Littig (2015): Sustainable Practices. In: Wright, James D. (ed.): The International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, second edition. Vol. 23. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 834-838.Google Scholar
  36. Jonas, Michael, Beate Littig (eds.) (2017): Praxeological Political Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Jonas, Michael, Beate Littig, Andrea Wroblewski (eds.) (2017): Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Jonas, Michael, Marion Berner (2010): Beyond Works Councils? Social Practices of Employee Participation and Culture in a Regional High-tech Cluster. European Societies 12(4): 493-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelle, Udo, Susann Kluge (2010): Vom Einzelfall zum Typus – Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS/Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, Rainer (2007): Diskursforschung – Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  41. Knorr Cetina, Karin (1999): Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lamnek, Siegfried, Claudia Krell (2016): Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  43. Lamnek, Siegried (1993): Qualitative Sozialforschung. Band 1. Methodologie. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  44. Lave, Jean, Etienne Wenger (1991): Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Littig, Beate (2013): On High Heels. A Praxeography of Doing Argentine Tango”. European Journal for Womens‘ Studies 20: 455-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Löw, Martina (2000): Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  47. Margalit, Avishai (2002): The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Marston, Sally, John Paul Jones III, Keith Woodward (2005) Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32: 416-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mol, Annemarie (2002): The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mol, Annemarie (2007): The Logic of Care – Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, Jeannette Pols (eds.) (2010): Care in Practice – On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  52. Moser, Inngun (2010): Perhaps tears should not be counted but wiped away. On quality and improvement in dementia care. pp. 257-300. In: Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, Jeannette Pols (eds.) (2010): Care in Practice – On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  53. Nicolini, Davide (2012): Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pickering, Andrew (1995): The Mangle of Practice – Time, Agency and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pols, Jeannette (2005): Enacting Appreciations: Beyond the Patient Perspective. Health Care Analysis 13(3): 203-221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pols, Jeannette (2012): Care at a Distance – On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pols, Jeannette, Bernike Pasveer, Dick Wilhelms (2018): The particularity of dignity: relational engagement in care at the end of life. Med Health Care and Philos 21:89-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pols, Jeannette, Sarah Limburg (2016): A matter of taste? Quality of life in day-to-day living with ALS and a feeding tube. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 40(3): 361-382.Google Scholar
  59. Pritzlaff, Tanja (2013): Political Practices as Performances of Political Responsibility. pp. 122-143. In: Johnson, Genevieve F., Loralea Michaelis (eds.): Political Responsibility Refocused – Thinking Justice after Iris Marion Young. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  60. Reckwitz, Andreas (2002a): Toward a theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reckwitz, Andreas (2002b): The Status of the “Material” in Theories of Culture: From “Social Structures” to “Artefacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32(2): 195-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reckwitz, Andreas (2003): Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken – Eine sozialtheoretische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32(4): 282-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reichertz, Jo (2007): Qualitative Sozialforschung – Ansprüche, Prämissen, Probleme. EWE 18 (2): 195-208.Google Scholar
  64. Ricoeur, Paul (2005): The Course of Recognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schatzki, Theodore (1996): Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Schatzki, Theodore (2001): Introduction. In: Schatzki, Theodore, Karin Knorr-Cetina, Eike von Savigny (eds.): The Practice Turn in Contemporary Social Theory. London: Routledge. pp. 1-14.Google Scholar
  67. Schatzki, Theodore (2002): The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Schatzki, Theodore (2010) Materiality and Social Life. Nature and Culture 5(2): 123-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schatzki, Theodore, Knorr-Cetina, Karin, von Savigny, Eike (eds.) (2001): The Practice Turn: Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Searle, John R. (1969): Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Shove, Elizabeth (2010): Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42: 1273-1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shove, Elizabeth, Pantzar, Mike, Watson, Mats (2012): The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Strauss, Anselm L., Juliett Corbin (1990): Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Strübing, Jörg (2004): Grounded Theory – Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung des Verfahrens der empirisch begründeten Theoriebildung. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  75. Taylor, Charles (1994): The Politics of Recognition. Pp. 25-73. In: Gutman, Amy (ed.): Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Taylor, Janelle (2010): On recognition, caring, and dementia. pp. 27-56. In: Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, Jeannette Pols (eds.) (2010): Care in Practice – On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  77. Thrift, Nigel (2004): Driving in the City. Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4/5) 41-59.Google Scholar
  78. Thrift, Nigel (2007): Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Warde, Alan (2005): Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5(2): 131-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Warde, Alan (2013) What sort of a practice is eating? Pp. 17-30. In: Shove, Elisabeth, N. Spurling (eds.) Sustainable Practices – Social theory and climate change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958): Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1984): Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Werkausgabe Band 1. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Höhere StudienWienÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations