Zusammenfassung
I met Joachim Höflich many years ago, after he looked me up by phone. After his first visit to Udine, he proposed to come to Pordenone, the seat of the University of Udine where I teach, with his most willing students, and to organise an Erasmus workshop with our respective students. Since that first workshop, many have followed, and over time the workshop on digital communication with Erfurt-Pordenone students has become a pleasant and important academic event.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Baron, N. S. (2015). Shall We Talk? Conversing With Humans and Robots. The Information Society 31(3), 254–257.
de Graaf, M. M. (2016). An ethical evaluation of human–robot relationships. International Journal of Social Robotics 8(4), 589–598.
de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interaction Studies 17(3), 462–491.
Delvaux, M. (2016). REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics.
Eurobarometer. (2012). Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
European Commission. (2014). Eurobarometer 77.1 (2012). TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels [Producer]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5597 Data file Version 3.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12014.
European Parliament (2015/2103(INL)). European Parliament 2014–2019.
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenbaun, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 143–166.
Fortunati, L. (2018). Robotization and the Domestic Sphere. New Media & Society 20(8), 2673–2690.
Fortunati, L., Manganelli, A. (2008). The social representations of telecommunications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 421–431.
Fortunati, L., Sarrica, M., Ferrin, G., Brondi, S., Honsell, F. (2018). Social robots as cultural objects. The sixth dimension of dynamicity? The Information Society 34(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1444253.
Fortunati, L., Cavallo, F., Sarrica, M. (2018). Multiple communication roles in human-robot interactions in the public space. International Journal of Social Robotics, published online 7 December 2018.
Gittleson, B. (2017). Saudi Arabia criticized for giving female robot citizenship, while it restricts women’s rights. ABC News, October 26. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
Goodrich, M. A., & Schulze, A. C. (2007). Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundation and Trends in Human-Computer-Interaction 1(3), 203–275.
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science 315, 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475
Guzman, A. L. (2019). Voices in and of the machine: Source orientation toward mobile virtual assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 90, January 2019, 343–350.
Höflich, J. R. (2003). Mensch, Computer und Kommunikation. Theoretische Verortungen und empirische Befunde. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Höflich, J. R. (2013). Relationships to Social Robots. intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange 1, 35–48.
Höflich, J. R., El Bayed, A. (2015). Perception, Acceptance, and the Social Construction of Robots – Exploratory Studies. In: J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, L. Fortunati, & G. Lugano (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 39–49.
Jensen, B., Tomatis, N., Mayor, L., Drygajlo, A., Siegwart, R. (2005). Robots Meet Humans – Interaction in Public Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 52, 1–17.
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 61–84.
Katz, J. E., Halpern, D., Thomas Crocker, E. (2015). In the Company of Robots: Views of Acceptability of Robots in Social Settings. In: J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, L. Fortunati, & G. Lugano (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 25–38.
Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Maza, C. (2017). Saudi Arabia Gives Citizenship to a Non-Muslim, English-Speaking Robot. Newsweek 26 October.
Niemelä, M., Heikkilä, P., Lammi, H. (2017). A Social Service Robot in a Shopping Mall: Expectations of the Management, Retailers and Consumers. Proceeding HRI ‘17. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 227–228.
Reeves, B., Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and the new media like real people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rheingold, H. (2000). Tools for thought: The history and future of mind-expanding technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Salvini, P. (2017). Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, available online 30 March.
Scholtz, C. (2008). Und täglich grüßt der Roboter. Analysen und Reflexionen des Alltags mit dem Roboterhund Aibo. In: Volkskunde in Rheinland-Pfalz. Informationen der Gesellschaft für Volkskunde in Rheinland-Pfalz e. V. 23, 139–154.
Simmel, G. (1995). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung (2nd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Sone, Y. (2016). Japanese Robot Culture. New York: Springer.
Sugiyama, S. (2013). Melding with the Self, Melding with Relational Partners, and Turning into a Quasi-social Robot: A Japanese Case Study of People’s Experiences of Emotion and Mobile Devices. intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange 1, 71–84.
Taipale, S., Vincent, J., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., Fortunati, L. (2015a). Introduction: Situating the human in social robots. In: J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano, & L. Fortunati. (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 1–7.
Taipale, S., de Luca, F., Sarrica, M., & Fortunati, L. (2015b). Robot shift from industrial production to social reproduction. In: J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, L. Fortunati, & G. Lugano (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 11–24.
Taipale S, Fortunati, L. (2018). Robots as the next new media. In: A. Guzman (Ed.), Human-Machine Communication: Rethinking Communication, Technology, and Ourselves. Berlin: Peter Lang, 201–219.
Vincent, J. (2013). Is the Mobile Phone a Personalized Social Robot? intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange 1, 60–70.
Vincent, J., Taipale, S., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., & Fortunati, L. (Eds.) (2015). Social robots from a human perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zhao, S. (2006). Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society 8(3), 401–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fortunati, L. (2019). When the new medium is a robot. In: Linke, C., Schlote, I. (eds) Soziales Medienhandeln. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27902-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27902-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27901-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27902-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)