Abstract
Aikidō was founded by Morihei Ueshiba based on Daito-ryū Aikijūjutsu, several other martial arts and beliefs from the Ōmoto religion, a so-called new Shinto sect. In previous researches, it was concluded that Ueshiba founded Aikidō independently after training Daito-ryū, but the continuity with Daito-ryū Jūjutsu has not been sufficiently clarified in the formation process of Aikidō in the prewar period when the relation between Daito-ryū and Ueshiba could be confirmed clearly. The author assumes that the relationship between student and teacher relationships, however, have a deeper level of understanding. In this study, the author aims to investigate Ueshiba’s various activities that were intended to be independent from Daito-ryū and will clarify the formative process of Aikidō as a modern Budō, focusing on the continuity and the discontinuity of Daito-ryū Aikijūjutsu. The analysis is based on historical material: two types of booklets on which Ueshiba’s training process of Daito-ryū was written, secret documents of Daito-ryū and secret documents which were given to Ueshiba’s pupils. The main points are as follows:
-
1.
Ueshiba’s training process of Daito-ryū. In 1915, Ueshiba became a pupil of Sokaku Takeda in Hokkaido. In 1922, Ueshiba received the kyōju dairi (instructor certification) license by Takeda in Kyoto. This meant that he would be incorporated into the Daito-ryū system as Iemoto (head of school). In 1931, Ueshiba received the Goshin’yo no Te license (84 self-defence techniques) which constituted the highest level of Daito-ryū at that time. In any case, Ueshiba paid a high payment to Takeda.
-
2.
Ueshiba’s various activities to become independent from Daito-ryū. Ueshiba gave to his pupil the scroll of Aioi-ryū Aikijūjutsu in 1928. In 1931 he established the Kobukan in Tokyo. Although Ueshiba gave his pupils the scroll of Daito-ryū again in 1932, after that, in the secret texts given to the disciples, the name of “Daito-ryū” disappeared, and the name of the techniques of Daito-ryū were also changed. However, Ueshiba continued to use clearly the word “aiki” which is a recurrent technical term of Daito-ryū during the prewar period.
As the above process shows, Ueshiba was influenced technically by Daito-ryū in the prewar period. The Iemoto system was also passed to him. This contrasts with judō, which originated from jūjutsu and was reorganized as a physical art suitable for modern Japan. Aikidō as a modern budō was formed with continuity with jūjutsu techniques while facing the problem of the Iemoto system in budō.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aiki News ed., [1992] (2002). Takeda Sokaku and Daito-ryū aikijutsu (Revised edition). Sagamihara: Aiki News.
Aiki News ed., (2003), Mourning for Master Minoru Mochizuki: 90 years with Budō, Aiki News, 138 (Autumn), (p. 20–33).
Aiki News ed. (2006). Ueshiba Morihei and Aikidō (I). Sagamihara: Aiki News.
Daito-ryū Aikibudō General Office of Tokyo. (1989). Daito-ryū Aikibudō. Tokyo: Daito-ryū Aikibudō General Office of Tokyo.
Inaga, Shigemi, (2005), The modern of Aikidō: Discontinuity and Succession from prewar to postwar period. Klopfenstein, E. (ed.), Continuity and Discontinuity of Japanese Culture: 1920–1970. Benseishuppan, (p. 297–321).
Kano, J., (1889), “General Aspects of the “Judō,” and its Value in Education,” The Journal of the Educational Society of Japan, 87: 446–481.
Kudo, R. (2015), The formation of Aikidō as a modern Budō: History of Technique and Thought about “Aiki”, Tokyo: Waseda University Press.
Kudo, R. (2016), The inception and development of Kenji Tomiki’s technical theory of budo during the prewar Showa era, with reference to the succession of Jigoro Kano’s concept of judo as a martial art, Japan Journal of Physical Education and Health. Sport Science, 61 (2) (p. 681–700).
Kudo, R. (2018), A historical study of the formative process of Aikidō as a modern Budo: Focusing on the Daito-ryu Aikijūjutsu training process of Morihei Ueshiba, Japan journal of the history of physical education and sport, 35 (p. 27–42).
Saito, M. (1999), Takemusu Aikidō Special Edition: Commentary on the 1938 Training Manual of Morihei Ueshiba, Sagamihara: Aiki News.
Shishida, F. & Nariyama, T. (1985) Aikidō School, Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
Shishida, F. (1992), The Martial Arts Diary of Isamu Takeshita and aikido founder Morihei Ueshiba circa 1926, Research Journal of Budo, 25 (2), (p. 1–12).
Sogawa, T. (1994), On the Concept of Judo as Presented by Jigoro Kano in his 1889 Lecture, Bulletin of the Association for the Scientific Studies on Judo, Kodokan, 7, (p. 1–10).
Takeshita, I. 1930–1931, Ken (copy).
Ueshiba, K. [1977] (1999), Aikidō founder Morihei Ueshiba (Revised edition), Tokyo: Shuppan Geijutsu-sha.
Ueshiba, K. (supervision), Aikikai (ed.), (2002), Aiki Shinzui: Aikidō Founder Ueshiba Morihei’s quotations, Tokyo: Hachimanshoten.
Ueshiba, M. (1933), Budō Training (copy).
Ueshiba, M. (1938), Budō, Seiundo print shop (copy).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP15H03067, JP18K17903. Mr. Eduard Cabrol checked my English original draft. I wish to express my gratitude.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kudo, R. (2020). A Historical Study of the Formative Process of Aikidō as a Modern Budō: Focusing on the Continuity and the Discontinuity of Jūjutsu. In: Krüger, M., Hofmann, A. (eds) Sportgeschichte in Deutschland - Sport History in Germany. Bildung und Sport, vol 22. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27822-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27822-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27821-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27822-9
eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)