Skip to main content

Lead users and the organization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World
  • 2164 Accesses

Abstract

Lead user research has branched out into many different research streams. In this paper I take an organizational view and differentiate three different perspectives which historically emerged in this sequence. First, lead users as external creators of ideas for focal firms. Second, lead users as creators of organizations. Third, lead users as internal creators of ideas for focal firms. I elaborate on opportunities for further research in each of these perspectives. As becomes apparent, Cornelius Herstatt has been a pioneer researcher in each of these perspectives and a significant source of inspiration for his students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belz, F. M., and W. Baumbach. 2010. Netnography as a method of lead user identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 304-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave, M. P. 1994. A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, H. G., and H. S. Rabinowitz. 1951. The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. Journal of experimental psychology, 41(2), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., and T. Ritter. 2018. Value creation and value capture in open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930-938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., and Christensen, C. 2008. Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchart, E., and M. Gruber. 2011. Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Keinz, P., and K. Klausberger. 2013. “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science, 24(5), 1495-1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., and S. Shah. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research policy, 32(1), 157-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., and M. Schreier. 2006. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead‐user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., and C. Lettl, 2004. Management of” technology push” development projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2-3), 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., Lüthje, C. and C. Lettl. 2003. Fortschrittliche Kunden zu Breakthrough-Innovationen stimulieren. In Management der frühen Innovationsphasen (pp. 57-71). Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., and E. von Hippel. 1992. From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C. 2006. The commercialization of user innovations: the development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management, 36(3), 273-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C. 2016. Technique Innovation. In Harhoff, D. and K. Lakhani (Eds.): Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities, and open innovation, 331-352, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., and C. Lettl. 2011. Exploring how peer communities enable lead user innovations to become the industry standard. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 175-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., and C. Lettl. 2017. Perspective: Understanding the Nature and Measurement of the Lead User Construct. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(1), 3-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., Von Hippel, E., and M. B. Jensen. 2014. User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study. Research Policy, 43(1), 190-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsch, M. E., Stockstrom, C., and C. Lüthje. 2014. User innovation in techniques: A case study analysis in the field of medical devices. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 484-494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, L., and N. Sakkab. 2006. Connect and develop. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, J., and C. Lettl. 2009. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 646-659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, J., C. Lettl, N. Franke, and P. Gloor. 2016. The Social Network Position of Lead Users. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., and G. Gemünden. 2006. Adopting radical innovation from outside: Promotors as the linking pin. In IFSAM-Conference Paper, Track (Vol. 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., C. Herstatt, and H. G. Gemünden. 2006. Users´ contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., C. Hienerth, and H. G. Gemünden. 2008. Exploring how lead users develop radical innovation: Opportuni-ty recognition and exploitation in the field of medical equipment technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 219-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G. L., P. D. Morrison, K. Searls, M. Sonnack, and E. von Hippel. 2002. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042-1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., and C. Herstatt. 2004. The Lead User method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34(5), 553-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., and E. von Hippel. 2005. User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34(6), 951-965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann Berger, S., and C. Lettl. 2013. Open Innovation via Collaborative Events: The Role of Incentives for Knowledge Sharing. Academy of Management Conference, August 9-13, 2013, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S., and H. G. Gemünden. 2015. Promotors and champions of innovation: Barriers to innovation and inno-vator roles. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to en-trepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth. 2012. Embedded lead users inside the firm: How innovative user employees contribute to the corpo-rate innovation process. Dissertation. TU Hamburg-Harburg. Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, T. G., and M. P. Dharmawan. 2019. Does lead userness foster idea implementation and diffusion? A study of internal shopfloor users. Research Policy, 48(1), 289-297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, T. G., and C. Herstatt. 2015. Embedded (lead) users as catalysts to product diffusion. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 151-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, T. G., and C. Raasch. 2015. Embedded lead users - The benefits of employing users for corporate innovation. Research Policy, 44(1), 168-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. 2000. Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer products field: Innovations in sporting equipment (Vol. 4105, pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Sloan Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., and M. Tripsas. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent & collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 123-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, F., and C. Herstatt. 2009. Users as sources for radical service innovations: opportunities from collaboration with service lead users. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12(3), 317-337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockstrom, C. S., Goduscheit, R. C., Lüthje, C., and J. H. Jørgensen. 2016. Identifying valuable users as informants for innovation processes: Comparing the search efficiency of pyramiding and screening. Research Policy, 45(2), 507-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. L., and E. von Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 569-582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32(7), 791-805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. 1994. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation: Users take center stage. Boston MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., Franke, N., and R. Prügl. 2009. Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects. Research Policy, 38(9), 1397-1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., and R. Katz. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821-833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., and M. Sonnack. 1999. Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J., and K. Lakhani. 2008. Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Lettl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lettl, C. (2020). Lead users and the organization. In: Tiwari, R., Buse, S. (eds) Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27241-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics