Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World pp 347–365Cite as

Enabling the digital economy - distributed ledger technologies for automating IP licensing payments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Developing innovations for the digital economy, such as IoT devices and connected mobility solutions is likely to require OEMs to combine IP from multiple sources (licensors) who exploit their IP to as many as possible licensees (other OEMs). Those involved in the provision of what we call distributed multi-IP solutions (d-mIPs) find themselves entangled in a complex many-to-many network or ‘licensing web’ having to operate payments based on licensing contracts under a variety of terms and conditions. In the digital economy and ‘pro-licensing era’ efficiently operating licensing payments to/from multiple licensors/licensees becomes increasingly mission-critical. Unfortunately, the current semi-manual processes are inherent of information asymmetries, uncertainties, trust problems and transaction costs, hence must be considered as inefficient. This paper discusses the challenges licensees and licensors face when operating licensing payments for d-mIPs. We propose a system based on distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts for automating trustworthy licensing payments that can substantially reduce currently existing challenges. The proposed system not only contributes to enabling the digital economy, but has further potential to enable new business models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.A., 1978. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, in: Uncertainty in Economics. Elsevier, pp. 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulos, N., Habib, S.M., Mühlhäuser, M., 2018. Towards Secure Distributed Trust Management on a Global Scale: An analytical approach for applying Distributed Ledgers for authorization in the IoT, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on IoT Security and Privacy - IoT S&P ’18. Presented at the the 2018 Workshop, ACM Press, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229565.3229569

  • Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., 2018. The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (IP) data. World Pat. Inf. 55, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., Athanassopoulou, N., Minshall, T., 2017. Exploring the future of patent analytics: a technology roadmapping approach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G., 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraniuk, C., 2016. Government urged to use digital ledgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezozi, H.I., 2017. Money Trapped: Miscalculations of Royalty and Licensing Income Resulting in Significant Underpayment to Creative Artists. Your Financ. Wizard. URL https://www.yourfinancialwizard.com/money-trapped-miscalculations-royalty-licensing-income-resulting-significant-underpayment-creative-artists/ (accessed 4.6.19).

  • BigchainDB GmbH, 2018. BigchainDB 2.0 - The Blockchain Database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, C.R., 1998. Convergence between telecommunications and other media: How should regulation adapt? Telecommun. Policy 22, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Bekkers, R., Granstrand, O., 2012. Intellectual property and licensing strategies in open collaborative innovation, in: Open Innovation in Firms and Public Administrations: Technologies for Value Creation. IGI global, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, D., Sandelin, J., 1998. Licence Agreements: Are You Getting the Royalties You Bargained For? Ind. High. Educ. 12, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/095042229801200305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, C.W., 2018. Disruption of financial intermediation by FinTech: a review on crowdfunding and blockchain. Account. Finance 58, 965–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez-Dreyfuss, G., 2016. Sweden tests blockchain technology for land registry. Reuters June 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W., 2006. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Kietzmann, J., 2014. Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organ. Environ. 27, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.A., Agrawal, N., Agrawal, V., 2006. Achieving breakthrough service delivery through dynamic asset deployment strategies. Interfaces 36, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinges, V., Urmetzer, F., Martinez, V., Zaki, M., Neely, A., 2015. The future of servitization: Technologies that will make a difference. Camb. Serv. Alliance Univ. Camb. Camb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, E., 2015. Patentpools: Eigenschaften, Motive und Implikationen. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union Blockchain Observatory, 2018. Blockchain Innovation in Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, E., Martin, H., Christopher, N., Josip, S., 2018. Intellectual Property Protection and Licensing of 3D Print with Blockchain Technology. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-103

  • Fernández-Caramés, T.M., Fraga-Lamas, P., 2018. Towards the internet-of-smart-clothing: A review on IoT wearables and garments for creating intelligent connected E-textiles. Electron. Switz. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics7120405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R.J., 2010. Deal or No Deal-Licensing Negotiations in Standard-Setting Organizations. Antitrust LJ 77, 855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., 2004. The economics and management of technology trade: towards a pro-licensing era? Int. J. Technol. Manag. 27, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., 2003. Are we on our way in the new economy with optimal inventive steps?, in: Economics, Law and Intellectual Property. Springer, pp. 223–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., 1999. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O., Oskarsson, C., 1994. Technology diversification in” MUL-TECH” corporations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 41, 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., 2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A., 2016. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 2047–2059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M., Nigischer, C., Stjepandic, J., 2017. Copyright protection in additive manufacturing with blockchain approach. Presented at the Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, pp. 914–921. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-779-5-914

  • Holland, M., Stjepandic, J., Nigischer, C., 2018. Intellectual Property Protection of 3D Print Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology. Presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436315

  • Holzmann, T., Sailer, K., Katzy, B.R., 2014. Matchmaking as multi-sided market for open innovation. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 26, 601–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, R., Butt, T.A., Afzaal, M., Salah, K., 2019. Trust management in social Internet of vehicles: Factors, challenges, blockchain, and fog solutions. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719825820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, K., Bjørn, P., 2018. Infrastructural grind: Introducing blockchain technology in the shipping domain. Presented at the Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148345

  • Karamitsos, I., Papadaki, M., Al Barghuthi, N.B., 2018. Design of the blockchain smart contract: A Use Case for Real Estate. J. Inf. Secur. 9, 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, V.J., 1998. Protecting Your Royalty Payments Using Audit Clauses in Licence Agreements. Ind. High. Educ. 12, 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/095042229801200306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F., 1992. Technology Fusion and the new R&D. Harv. Bus. Rev.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, A.S.A., Chakravarti, A.K., 1997. Intellectual property rights in the ensuing global digital economy. Electron. Inf. Plan. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, D., Kundu, D., 2019. Blockchain and Trust in a Smart City. Environ. Urban. ASIA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425319832392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., 2014. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Zhang, A., Shen, Z., Chai, Y., 2018. Blockchain and IoT based food traceability for smart agriculture. Presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126973.3126980

  • Ma, Z., Jiang, M., Gao, H., Wang, Z., 2018. Blockchain for digital rights management. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 89, 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M., Robles, D., Bowe, B., n.d. BIM+Blockchain: A Solution to the Trust Problem in Collaboration? 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaghy, M., McMullen, G., Parry, G., McConaghy, T., Holtzman, D., 2017. Visibility and digital art: blockchain as an ownership layer on the Internet. Strateg. Change 26, 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T.A., Tinney, C.H., Tinney, T.J., 1985. Guidelines for corporate trademark licensing. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(85)90038-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montecchi, M., Plangger, K., Etter, M., 2019. It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Bus. Horiz. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M., 1997. Co-opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notheisen, B., Cholewa, J.B., Shanmugam, A.P., 2017. Trading Real-World Assets on Blockchain: An Application of Trust-Free Transaction Systems in the Market for Lemons. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0499-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dair, M., 2018. Distributed creativity: how blockchain technology will transform the creative economy. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pãnescu, A.-T., Manta, V., 2018. Smart Contracts for Research Data Rights Management over the Ethereum Blockchain Network. Sci. Technol. Libr. 37, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2018.1474838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-S., Youn, T.-Y., Kim, H.-B., Rhee, K.-H., Shin, S.-U., 2018. Smart contract-based review system for an IoT data marketplace. Sens. Switz. 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, A., Kantarcioglu, M., 2018. Smartprovenance: A distributed, blockchain based data provenance system. Presented at the CODASPY 2018 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176258.3176333

  • Royalty Exchange, 2017. Even Quincy Jones Gets Underpaid. How To Collect All The Royalties You’re Due. [WWW Document]. R. Exch. URL https://www.royaltyexchange.com/blog/even-quincy-jones-gets-underpaid-how-to-collect-all-the-royalties-youre-due (accessed 4.6.19).

  • Rycroft, R.W., Kash, D.E., 1999. The complexity challenge: Technological innovation for the 21st century. Cengage Learning EMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelyev, A., 2018. Copyright in the blockchain era: Promises and challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34, 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S., 1999. Cumulative innovation in theory and practice. Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, N., S. Chambers, C. Harland, A. Harrison and R. Johnston, 1995. Operations Management, Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somaya, D., Teece, D., Wakeman, S., 2011. Innovation in multi-invention contexts: Mapping solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity. Calif. Manage. Rev. 53, 47–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman, A., 2016. Blockchain: digitally rebuilding the real estate industry (PhD Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J., 1961. The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S.-I., 2011. Introduction to patent map analysis. Jpn. Pat. Off. 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M., 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., 1999. Blueprint to the digital economy: Creating wealth in the era of e-business. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., 1996. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. McGraw-Hill New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., 2018. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 47, 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., 2012. Next-generation competition: New concepts for understanding how innovation shapes competition and policy in the digital economy. JL Econ Pol 9, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, F., 2012. Technology market transactions: auctions, intermediaries and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, F., Schiederig, T., Herstatt, C., 2013. Firms’ transition to green product service system innovators: cases from the mobility sector. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 63, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomar, V., 2009. Trademark licensing & franchising: Trends in transfer of rights. J. Intellect. Prop. Rights 14, 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treece, J.M., 1967. Trademark Licensing and Vertical Restraints in Franchising Arrangements. U Pa Rev 116, 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urien, P., 2019. Blockchain IoT (BIoT): A new direction for solving internet of things security and trust issues. Presented at the 3rd Cloudification of the Internet of Things Conference, CIoT 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIOT.2018.8627112

  • Veuger, J., 2018. Trust in a viable real estate economy with disruption and blockchain. Facilities 36, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walport, M., 2015. Distributed Ledger Technology: Beyond Block Chain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibowo, S., Hw, E.P., 2018. Blockchain Implementation Assessment Framework, Case Study of IoT LPWA Licensing in Indonesia. Presented at the Proceeding - 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: Innovation Toward Smart Society and Society 5.0, ICISS 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSS.2018.8549940

  • Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies. N. Y. 2630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K., 2016. Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?-A Systematic Review. PloS One 11, e0163477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Wright, J., Nepal, S., Zhu, L., Liu, J., Ranjan, R., 2018. Trust chain: Establishing trust in the iot-based applications ecosystem using blockchain. IEEE Cloud Comput. 5, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2018.043221010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Li, S., Huang, Q., Liu, Y., 2018. Blockchain Technology Hyperledger Framework in the Internet of Energy. Presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/168/1/012043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zhao, L., 2018. A design of digital rights management mechanism based on blockchain technology. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinforma. 10974 LNCS, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94478-4_3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Technology Management, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Frank Tietze & Ove Granstrand

Authors
  1. Frank Tietze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ove Granstrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Tietze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Rajnish Tiwari

  2. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany

    Stephan Buse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tietze, F., Granstrand, O. (2020). Enabling the digital economy - distributed ledger technologies for automating IP licensing payments. In: Tiwari, R., Buse, S. (eds) Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27241-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation