Summary
Problem: Visions of technology, future scenarios, guiding visions (Leitbilder) represent imaginations of future states of affairs that play a functional role in processes of technological research, development and innovation—e.g. as a means to create attention, communication, coordination, or for the strategic exertion of influence. Since a couple of years there is a growing attention for such imaginations of futures in politics, the economy, research and the civil society. This trend concerns technology assessment (TA) as an observer of these processes and a consultant on the implications of technology and innovation. TA faces increasing demands to assess imaginations of futures that circulate in the present and to participate in shaping these through scenarios or foresights. More than ever, this raises the question, which propositions can be made based on these imaginations by TA and how this can be used in advisory practices. Imaginations of futures are relevant for TA not as predictions but in their significance and effectiveness in the present, which need to be understood and assessed.
Contents: This discussion paper outlines how present significance and effects of imagined futures in technological research and innovation processes can be conceived and analyzed. In this paper, all forms of imaginations of technology futures will be called “socio-technical futures” because within them technological developments and social changes are interwoven and inseparably interrelated. In this paper, we discuss (1) why TA should analyze socio-technical futures, (2) how such analyses can grasp the societal conditions (e.g. power structures) that are expressed in the imagined futures and how these become effective in processes of technology development, communication, decision making etc. We raise the question (3) which self-reflexive positioning or possible realignment of TA is needed as a response to its increased concern with assessing and even co-producing socio-technical futures. The latter is often demanded regarding the growing attention by politics and publics to imaginations of futures with wide temporal and spatial reach.
Addressee of this paper is the TA community in a broader sense. The aim is to sensitize colleagues for the topic and its challenges, to consolidate discussions and to provide theoretical and methodical suggestions for research in TA and related advisory practices with respect to socio-technical futures. This paper has been originally initiated during the workshop “The present of technological futures-theoretical and methodical challenges for Technology Assessment” (March 2016, Karlsruhe), in which all of the paper’s authors participated. The contents of this discussion paper are preliminary results that shall initiate and guide further discussions.
This chapter contains the translation of the German version of a discussion paper collectively developed in the context of a workshop of scholars from the fields of technology assessment, innovation analysis, science and technology studies (STS) and foresight. The German version has been published in December 2016 online (see: http://www.itz.kit.edu/112.php) and was discussed widely in the German speaking TA community.
A. Lösch, K. Böhle, C. Coenen, P. Dobroc, A. Ferrari, R. Heil, D. Hommrich, M. Sand, and C. Schneider have been the editorial staff of the ITAS-project “Visions as socio-epistemic practices” (https://www.itas.kit.edu/english/projects_loes14_luv.php).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsRecommended Readings
On Sections 1 and 2
Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden: Brill.
Banse, G., Grunwald, A., Hronszky, I., & Nelson, G. (Eds.). (2011). On prospective technology studies (KIT Scientific Reports 7599). Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
Böhle, K. (2015). Desorientierung der TA oder Orientierungsgewinn? Einige Anmerkungen zum Vorschlag, die TA hermeneutisch zu erweitern. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(3), 91–97.
Brown, N., Rappert, B., & Webster, A. (Eds.). (2000). Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science. Farnham: Ashgate.
Gransche, B. (2015). Vorausschauendes Denken. Philosophie und Zukunftsforschung jenseits von Statistik und Kalkül. Bielefeld: Transkript.
Grunwald, A. (2012). Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
Grunwald, A. (2013). Techno-visionary sciences. Challenges to policy advice. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 21–38.
Grunwald, A. (2015). Die hermeneutische Erweiterung der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(2), 65–69.
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Nordmann, A. (2007). If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics, 1(1), 31–46.
Nordmann, A. (2010). A forensics of wishing: Technology assessment in the age of technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 7(1), 5–15.
Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2015). Antizipation von Zukunft zwischen Verwissenschaftlichung und Storytelling. In S. Azzouni, S. Böschen, & C. Reinhardt (Eds.), Erzählung und Geltung. Wissenschaft zwischen Autorschaft und Autorität (pp. 363–384). Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Schulz, M. S. (2015). Special issue: Future moves in culture, society and technology. Poiesis & Praxis, 63(2), 129–139.
Selin, C. (2008). The sociology of the future. Tracing stories of technology and time. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1878–1895.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
Torgersen, H. (2013). TA als hermeneutische Unternehmung. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 22(2), 75–80.
On Section 3
Alvial Palavicino, C. (2016). Mindful anticipation. A practice approach to the study of emergent technologies. Enschede: University of Twente.
Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact. London: Verso.
Aykut, S. (2015). Energy futures from the social market economy to the Energiewende. The politicization of West German energy debates, 1950–1990. In J. Andersson & E. Rindzevičiūtė (Eds.), Forging the future (pp. 63–91). New York: Routledge.
Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240.
Böhle, K., & Bopp, K. (2014). What a vision: The artificial companion. A piece of vision assessment including an expert survey. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10(1), 155–186.
Dickel, S., & Schrape, J.-F. (2015). Dezentralisierung, Demokratisierung, Emanzipation. Zur Architektur des digitalen Technikutopismus. Leviathan, 43(3), 442–463.
Dieckhoff, C., Appelrath, H.-J., Fischedick, M., Grunwald, A., Höffler, F., Mayer, C., et al. (2014). Zur Interpretation von Energieszenarien. Schriftenreihe Energiesysteme der Zukunft. München: acatech-Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften e. V.
Dierkes, M., Hoffman, U., & Marz, L. (1992). Leitbild und Technik. Zur Entstehung und Steuerung technischer Innovationen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Geideck, S., & Liebert, W.-A. (Eds.). (2003). Sinnformeln. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Grin, J., & Grunwald, A. (Eds.). (2000). Vision assessment: Shaping technology in 21st century society. Towards a repertoire for technology assessment. New York: Springer.
Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A., & Truffer, B. (2012). Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1084–1098.
Leitner, K.-H., Warnke, P., & Rhomberg, W. (2016). New forms of innovation. Critical issues for future pathways. Foresight, 18(3), 224–237.
Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. New York: Springer.
Lösch, A. (2013). Vision Assessment zu Human-Enhancement-Technologien. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zu einer Analytik von Visionen im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Kommunikationsprozesse. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 22(1), 9–16.
Lösch, A. (2014). Die diskursive Konstruktion einer Technowissenschaft. Wissenssoziologische Analytik am Beispiel der Nanotechnologie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Lösch, A., & Schneider, C. (2016). Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: The smart grid in the German energy transition. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 262–284.
Scheer, D. (2013). Computersimulationen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen: Zur Politikrelevanz von Simulationswissen am Beispiel der CO2-Speicherung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Scheer, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125(3–4), 305–318.
Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (2013). Scenarios as patterns of orientation in technology development and technology assessment. Outline of a research program. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(1), 23–44.
Schulz-Schaeffer, I., & Meister, M. (2015). How situational scenarios guide technology development-Some insights from research on ubiquitous computing. In D. M. Bowman, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, H. van Lente, & S. Woll (Eds.), Practices of innovation and responsibility. Insights from methods, governance and action (pp. 165–179). Heidelberg: AKA/IOS.
te Kulve, H., Konrad, K., Alvial Palavicino, C., & Walhout, B. (2013). Context matters: Promises and concerns regarding nanotechnologies for water and food applications. NanoEthics, 7(1), 17–27.
Warnke, P., & Schirrmeister, E. (2016). Small seeds for grand challenges—Exploring disregarded seeds of change in a foresight process for RTI policy. Futures, 77, 1–10.
Wentland, A. (2016). Imagining and enacting the future of the German energy transition: Electric vehicles as grid infrastructure. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 285–302.
On Section 4
Ahlqvist, T., & Rhisiart, M. (2015). Emerging pathways for critical futures research: Changing contexts and impacts of social theory. Futures, 71, 91–104.
Coenen, C., & Simakova, E. (2013). STS policy interactions, technology assessment and the governance of technovisionary sciences. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 3–20.
Dickel, S. (2013). Die Regulierung der Zukunft. “Emerging Technologies” und das Problem der Exklusion des Spekulativen. In A. Bora, A. Henkel, & C. Reinhardt (Eds.), Wissensregulierung und Regulierungswissen (pp. 201–218). Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Dieckhoff, C. (2015). Modellierte Zukunft-Energieszenarien in der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Bielefeld: Transkript.
Grunwald, A. (2008). Technik und Politikberatung. Philosophische Perspektiven. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Konrad, K., Stegmaier, P., Rip, A., & Kuhlmann, S. (2014). Constructive technology assessment-Antizipation Modulieren als Teil der Governance von Innovation. In M. Löw (Ed.), Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Verhandlungen des 36. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bochum und Dortmund 2012. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus (CD-Rom).
Konrad, K., van Lente, H., Groves, C., & Selin, C. (2016). Performing and governing the future in science and technology. In C. A. Miller, U. Felt, R. Fouché, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed., pp. 465–493). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
McCray, W. P. (2012). The visioneers: How a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies, and a limitless future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nordmann, A. (2013). Visioneering assessment: On the construction of tunnel visions for technovisionary research and policy. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 89–94.
Nordmann, A. (2014). Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 87–98.
Poli, R. (2014). Anticipation: What about turning the human and social sciences upside down? Futures, 64, 15–18.
Rip, A. (2012). Futures of technology assessment. In M. Decker, A. Grunwald, & M. Knapp (Eds.), Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenabschätzung in der Technikgestaltung (pp. 29–42). Berlin: Sigma.
Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2006). Governance von Zukunftsversprechen: Zur politischen Ökonomie der Nanotechnologie. PROKLA, 145, 473–496.
Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2013). The role of future-oriented technology analysis in the governance of emerging technologies: The example of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 444–452.
Schneider, C., & Lösch, A. (2015). What about your futures, Technology Assessment? An Essay on how to take the visions of TA seriously, motivated by the PACITA conference. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(2), 70–74.
Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1996). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54, 251–268.
Schot, J., & Steinmüller, W. E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. Brighton: University of Sussex. http://www.johanschot.com/publications/framing-innovation-policy-for-transformative-change-innovation-policy-3-0/.
Suchman, L., & Bishop, L. (2000). Problematizing ‘Innovation’ as a critical project. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(3), 327–333.
Weber, K. M., Amanatidou, E., Erdmann, L., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Research and innovation futures. Exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight, 18(3), 193–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lösch, A. et al. (2019). Technology Assessment of Socio-Technical Futures—A Discussion Paper. In: Lösch, A., Grunwald, A., Meister, M., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (eds) Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27155-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27155-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27154-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27155-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)