Abstract
Diabetes education is a type of institutional communication that is often regarded as unpleasant, even stressful by those affected—with a corresponding negative impact on its success. In public discussion it is only slowly that we are beginning to realize how crucial concrete linguistic practice (consisting of linguistic actions) is for successfully coping with a disease of which the prevalence is steadily increasing. For this reason, we examine what actually happens communicatively in situations which are often referred to as “Beratung” (counselling) in German and as “education” in English. Based on Functional Pragmatics, we show that communication in our multilingual corpus is quite typically affected by a “directive drift” and thus may be reconstructed rather as prescribing than counselling, which may adversely affect patient compliance. As more and more people with a migration background are affected by diabetes, we include interpreting as an additional factor in our discussion.
Paper dedicated to Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ludwig Maximilian Eichinger on the occasion of his 65th birthday.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to the differentiation of various actor roles in institutional communication, introduced by Ehlich and Rehbein in 1977a, ‘agent’ should be taken to mean the representative of an institution.
- 2.
The relevance of these quotes to the present research becomes apparent when compared with accounts of patients’ experiences published in Language Matters (NHS England 2018).
- 3.
According to the approach of critical discourse analysis it can be assumed that ‘discourse formations’ (cf. Foucault 1974) of guilt and transgression establish a conceptual background for treating the topic diabetes in the public opinion. In addition, historical semantics as a field of interest in CDA, sheds light on the relevance of variable disease concepts in changing societies.
- 4.
These kinds of scenarios are of course taken up in the media, often with a very specific purpose—from simple provision of information to guides in book form or infotainment on television. Today, there are about 108 million hits relating to health on Google; Amazon sells approximately 10,000 books on the topic of diabetes; over 160 pages on health and psychology were published in FOCUS magazine in 2006 (Müller 2009, p. 2). Within these discourse formations, specific roles for affected persons emerge: Guilty parties, obedient and disobedient students, fighters, victims etc., in any case target groups for rules, instructions and controlling access.—Identifying and describing these ascription mechanisms would be one aspect of a research project that we have planned which is oriented to the media diversity of communication on the topic of diabetes and weight; it plays an important role in allowing the constellation of dietary consultations to be evaluated.
- 5.
Berger’s (2018) publication may serve as an example which on the one hand emphasizes the importance of adequate communication with the patients, be it with or without a migration background. On the other hand, this publication neither discusses empirical communication nor does it discuss any concrete communicative consequences.
- 6.
These discussions originate from the corpus “Dolmetschen im Krankenhaus” (“Interpreting in hospitals”) (https://www.corpora.uni-hamburg.de/sfb538/de_k2_dik.html; cf. also Bührig et al. 2012). However, the involvement of interpreters is not intended to be the focus of this article, but is reserved for a separate publication.
- 7.
This term is also used by the actors themselves and is retained as a second ‘ethno category’ in this article.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
We choose this term tentatively and out of necessity ex negativo, complementing the concept of ‘non-directivity’ of therapeutic discussions introduced by Rogers (1942), which has been used many times since then for the optimisation of discussions with advisory natures.
- 11.
Of course, this is not an exhaustive list. With a view to the process of reconstructive analysis, the listed elements can be best understood as subjects of heuristic questions and are mainly based on the findings of the formative and distinctive variables of the use of language.
- 12.
- 13.
The professional ‘maxim knowledge’ (Ehlich and Rehbein 1977a) of the agent can be explored as the origin of this third-party will, which comes into effect due to the patient’s increased blood sugar levels.
- 14.
For a detailed determination of the power of the conjunctive form in German, cf. Redder (1992).
References
Agyemang, C., Beune, E., Meeks, K., Addo, J., Aikins, A. D., Bahendeka, S., et al. (2016). Innovative ways of studying the effect of migration on obesity and diabetes beyond the common designs: Lessons from the RODAM study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1391(1), 54–70.
Alloh, F. (2018). Improving diabetes outcome: A need to understand management among Africans living with diabetes in the UK. Journal of Primary Health Care and General Practice, 2(1). https://scientonline.org/open-access/improving-diabetes-outcome-a-need-to-understand-management-among-africans-living-with-diabetes-in-the-uk.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2019.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Berger, F. (2018). Typ-2-Diabetes und Migranten: Menschen aus verschiedenen Sprach- und Kulturräumen. Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel,13(3), 241–256.
Bergis, N., Ehrmann, D., Hermanns, N., & Haak, T. (2012). Lässt sich Empowerment bei Menschen mit Diabetes messen? Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel,7, 9.
Brinkmann, H. (1971). Die deutsche Sprache—Gestalt und Leistung. Düsseldorf: Schwann.
Brünner, G. (2011). Gesundheit durchs Fernsehen. Linguistische Untersuchungen zur Vermittlung medizinischen Wissens und Aufklärung in Gesundheitssendungen. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.
Bühler, K. (1982). Sprachtheorie. Zur Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer (First publication 1934).
Bührig, K. (1996). Reformulierende Handlungen. Zur Analyse sprachlicher Adaptierungprozesse in institutioneller Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.
Bührig, K. (2005). ‘Speech action patterns’ and ‘discourse types’. Folia Linguistica, XXXIX/1–2, 143–171.
Bührig, K., Kliche, O., Pawlack, B., & Meyer, B. (2012). The corpus “Interpreting in Hospitals”: Possible applications for research and communication training. In T. Schmidt & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual corpora and multilingual corpus analysis (pp. 305–315). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bührig, K., Fienemann, J., & Schlickau, S. (2017). Zu einigen Charakteristika von Diabetesberatungen. In A. Krause, G. Lehmann, W. Thielmann, & C. Trautmann (Eds.), Form und Funktion. Festschrift für Angelika Redder zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 533–546). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Danne, T. (2013). Vorwort. In diabetesDE—Deutsche Diabetes-Hilfe (Ed.), Deutscher Gesundheitsbericht. Diabetes 2013 (pp. 6–9). Berlin: Kirchheim.
Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care, 41(12), 2669–2701.
Dickinson, J. K., Guzman, S. J., Maryniuk, M. D., O’Brian, C. A., Kadohiro, J. K., Jackson, R. A., et al. (2017). The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care,40(12), 1790–1799.
Döring, M. (2010). Konzeptualisierung(en) des Metabolischen Syndroms: Versuch einer diskurshistorischen Analyse über ein zeitgenössisches Syndromkonzept. In M. Langwiler & J. Madarász (Eds.), Das präventive Selbst. Eine Kulturgeschichte moderner Gesundheitspolitik (pp. 325–353). Bielefeld: transcript.
Ehlich, K. (1979). Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
Ehlich, K. (1986). Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse—Ziele und Verfahren. In W.-D. Hartung (Ed.), Untersuchungen zur Kommunikation—Ergebnisse und Perspektiven (pp. 15–40). Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.
Ehlich, K. (1992). HIAT—A transcription system for discourse data. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 123–148). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1972). Einige Interrelationen von Modalverben. In D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Linguistische Pragmatik (pp. 318–340). Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1976). Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT). Linguistische Berichte,45, 21–41.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1977a). Wissen, kommunikatives Handeln und die Schule. In H. C. Goeppert (Ed.), Sprachverhalten im Unterricht (pp. 36–114). München: Fink.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1977b). Batterien sprachlicher Handlungen. In Journatul aof Pragmatics 1(4), 393–405.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1979). Sprachliche Handlungsmuster. In H.-G. Soeffner (Ed.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften (pp. 243–274). Stuttgart: Metzler.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1986). Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zu schulischer Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.
Foucault, M. (1974). Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Funnel, M. M., Anderson, R. M., Arnold, M. S., Barr, P. A., Donnelly, M., Johnson, P. D., Taylor-Moon, D., & White, N. H. (1991). Empowerment. An idea whose time has come in diabetes education. The Diabetes Educator, 17(1), 36–41.
Grießhaber, W. (2001). Verfahren und Tendenzen der funktional-pragmatischen Diskursanalyse. Vom Speiserestaurant zum Cybercafé. In Z. Ivanyi & A. Kertész (Eds.), Gesprächsforschung: Tendenzen und Perspektiven (pp. 75–95). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
Guell, C. (2011). Candi(e)d action: Biosocialities and Turkish berliners living with diabetes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly,25(3), 377–394.
Heesen, C., Berger, B., Hamann, J., & Kasper, J. (2006). Empowerment, Adhärenz, evidenzbasierte Patienteninformation und partizipative Entscheidungsfindung bei MS—Schlagworte oder Wegweiser? Neurologie und Rehabilitation,4, 232–238.
Knipper, M., & Bilgin, Y. (2009). Migration und Gesundheit. Bonn: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Kofahl, C., von dem Knesebeck, O., Hollmann, J., & Mnich, E. (2013). Diabetesspezifische Gesundheitskompetenz: Was wissen türkischstämmige Menschen mit Diabetes mellitus 2 über ihre Erkrankung? Das Gesundheitswesen,75(12), 803–811.
Kulzer, B. (2013). Nationaler Diabetesplan. In diabetesDE—Deutsche Diabetes-Hilfe (Ed.), Deutscher Gesundheitsbericht. Diabetes 2013 (pp. 196–205). Berlin: Krichheim.
Lalouschek, J. (2013). Anliegensklärung im ärztlichen Gespräch—Patientenbeteiligung und neue Formen medizinischer Kommunikation. In F. Menz (Ed.), Migration und medizinische Kommunikation. Linguistische Verfahren der Patientenbeteiligung und Verständnissicherung in ärztlichen Gesprächen mit MigrantInnen (pp. 353–444). Wien: V & R University Press.
Lalouschek, J., & Brünner, G. (2010). Von der Selbskasteiung zum Genuss. Zum Wandel der Diskurse über Diät und richtige Ernährung in Gesundheitssendungen des Fernsehens. In R. de Cillia, H. Gruber, M. Krzyżanowski, & F. Menz (Eds.), Diskurs, Politik, Identität. Festschrift für Ruth Wodak (pp. 137–147). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Laube, H., Bayraktar, H., Gökce, Y., Akinci, A., Erkal, Z., Bödeker, R., et al. (2004). Zur Diabeteshäufigkeit unter türkischen Migranten in Deutschland. Darmstadt: Merck Pharma.
Li, X., Sundquist, J., Zöller, B., Benneta, L., & Sundquist, K. (2013). Risk of hospitalization for type 2 diabetes in first- and second-generation immigrants in Sweden: A nationwide follow-up study. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications,27(1), 49–53.
Łuczyński, W., Głowińska-Olszewska, B., & Bossowski, A. (2016). Empowerment in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. Journal of diabetes research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5671492.
Meeks, K. A. C., Freitas-Da-Silva, D., Adeyemo, A., Beune, E. J. A. J., Modesti, P. A., Stronks, K., et al. (2016). Disparities in type 2 diabetes prevalence among ethnic minority groups resident in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal and Emergency Medicine,11(3), 327–340.
Merriam-Webster. (n. d.) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prescription. Accessed 3 May 2019.
Müller, L. (2009). Das Informationsverhalten von Diabetespatienten. Hamburg: Diplomica.
NHS England. (2018). Language matters: Language and diabetes. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/language-matters.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2019.
Perez-Rodriguez, M., Ramirez-Palacios, P., Salmeron, J., & Talavera, J. (2017). Dietary patterns associated with incidence of metabolic syndrome and its components. The FASEB Journal, 31(1)_supplement, lb348–lb348. https://www.fasebj.org/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.lb348. Accessed 15 May 2019.
Pooley, C. G., Gerrard, C., Hollis, C., Morton, S., & Astbury, J. (2001). “Oh It’s a wonderful practice. you can talk to them”: A qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ views on the management of type 2 diabetes. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(4), 318–328.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology,15(2), 121–148.
Raymond, M. W. (1984). Teaching toward compliance: A patient’s perspective. The Diabetes Educator,10, 42–44.
Redder, A. (1984). Modalverben im Unterrichtsdiskurs. Pragmatik der Modalverben am Beispiel eines institutionellen Diskurses. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Redder, A. (1990). Grammatik und sprachliches Handeln:denn‘ und,da‘. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Redder, A. (1992). Funktional-grammatischer Aufbau des Verb-Systems im Deutschen. In L. Hoffmann (Ed.) Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten (pp. 128–154). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Redder, A. (2008). Functional Pragmatics. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 133–178). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rehbein, J. (1977). Komplexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorie von Sprache. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Rehbein, J. (1978). Ankündigungen. Germanistische Linguistik. Varia V., 339–387.
Rehbein, J. (1981). Announcing—On formulating plans. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine (pp. 215–258). The Hague: Mouton.
Rehbein, J. (1998). Die Verwendung von Institutionensprache in Ämtern und Behörden. In L. Hoffmann, H. Kalverkämper, & E. H. Wiegand (Eds.), Fachsprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft (pp. 660–675). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rehbein, J. (2001). Das Konzept der Diskursanalyse. In K. Brinker, G. Antos, W. Heinemann, & S. F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Linguistics of Text and Conversation. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Vol. 2, pp. 927–945). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rehbein, J. (2004). Matrix-Konstruktionen in Diskurs und Text. In N. Baumgarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz, & J. Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung—Das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 251–275). Bochum: AKS.
Rogers, C. (1942). Counselling and Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Seidl, E., Walter, I., & Rappold, E. (2007). Diabetes. Der Umgang mit einer chronischen Krankheit. Wien: Böhlau.
Stevenson, F. A., Kerr C., Murray, E., & Nazareth, I. (2007). Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: The patient perspective – a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice (2007)8: 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-47.
Stirbu, I., Kunst, A. E., Bos, V., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2006). Differences in avoidable mortality between migrants and the native Dutch in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 6(78) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1435889. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.
Ujcic-Voortman, J. K., Schram, M. T., Jacobs-van Der Bruggen, M. A., Verhoeff, A. P., & Baan, C. A. (2009). Diabetes prevalence and risk factors among ethnic minorities. European Journal of Public Health,19(5), 511–515.
van Dulmen, A. M., Verhaak, P. F. M., & Bilo, H. J. G. (1997). Shifts in doctor-patient-communication in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counselling,30, 227–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bührig, K., Fienemann, J., Schlickau, S. (2020). On Certain Characteristics of ‘Diabetes Consultations’. In: Hohenstein, C., Lévy-Tödter, M. (eds) Multilingual Healthcare. FOM-Edition(). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27120-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27120-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27119-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27120-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)