Skip to main content

On Certain Characteristics of ‘Diabetes Consultations’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilingual Healthcare

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((INTSE))

  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

Diabetes education is a type of institutional communication that is often regarded as unpleasant, even stressful by those affected—with a corresponding negative impact on its success. In public discussion it is only slowly that we are beginning to realize how crucial concrete linguistic practice (consisting of linguistic actions) is for successfully coping with a disease of which the prevalence is steadily increasing. For this reason, we examine what actually happens communicatively in situations which are often referred to as “Beratung” (counselling) in German and as “education” in English. Based on Functional Pragmatics, we show that communication in our multilingual corpus is quite typically affected by a “directive drift” and thus may be reconstructed rather as prescribing than counselling, which may adversely affect patient compliance. As more and more people with a migration background are affected by diabetes, we include interpreting as an additional factor in our discussion.

Paper dedicated to Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ludwig Maximilian Eichinger on the occasion of his 65th birthday.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the differentiation of various actor roles in institutional communication, introduced by Ehlich and Rehbein in 1977a, ‘agent’ should be taken to mean the representative of an institution.

  2. 2.

    The relevance of these quotes to the present research becomes apparent when compared with accounts of patients’ experiences published in Language Matters (NHS England 2018).

  3. 3.

    According to the approach of critical discourse analysis it can be assumed that ‘discourse formations’ (cf. Foucault 1974) of guilt and transgression establish a conceptual background for treating the topic diabetes in the public opinion. In addition, historical semantics as a field of interest in CDA, sheds light on the relevance of variable disease concepts in changing societies.

  4. 4.

    These kinds of scenarios are of course taken up in the media, often with a very specific purpose—from simple provision of information to guides in book form or infotainment on television. Today, there are about 108 million hits relating to health on Google; Amazon sells approximately 10,000 books on the topic of diabetes; over 160 pages on health and psychology were published in FOCUS magazine in 2006 (Müller 2009, p. 2). Within these discourse formations, specific roles for affected persons emerge: Guilty parties, obedient and disobedient students, fighters, victims etc., in any case target groups for rules, instructions and controlling access.—Identifying and describing these ascription mechanisms would be one aspect of a research project that we have planned which is oriented to the media diversity of communication on the topic of diabetes and weight; it plays an important role in allowing the constellation of dietary consultations to be evaluated.

  5. 5.

    Berger’s (2018) publication may serve as an example which on the one hand emphasizes the importance of adequate communication with the patients, be it with or without a migration background. On the other hand, this publication neither discusses empirical communication nor does it discuss any concrete communicative consequences.

  6. 6.

    These discussions originate from the corpus “Dolmetschen im Krankenhaus” (“Interpreting in hospitals”) (https://www.corpora.uni-hamburg.de/sfb538/de_k2_dik.html; cf. also Bührig et al. 2012). However, the involvement of interpreters is not intended to be the focus of this article, but is reserved for a separate publication.

  7. 7.

    This term is also used by the actors themselves and is retained as a second ‘ethno category’ in this article.

  8. 8.

    Cf. for example Ehlich (1986), Grießhaber (2001), Rehbein (2001), Bührig (2005), Redder (2008).

  9. 9.

    This was made clear already by, for example, the analyses of Ehlich and Rehbein (1979, 1986) on communication in schools.

  10. 10.

    We choose this term tentatively and out of necessity ex negativo, complementing the concept of ‘non-directivity’ of therapeutic discussions introduced by Rogers (1942), which has been used many times since then for the optimisation of discussions with advisory natures.

  11. 11.

    Of course, this is not an exhaustive list. With a view to the process of reconstructive analysis, the listed elements can be best understood as subjects of heuristic questions and are mainly based on the findings of the formative and distinctive variables of the use of language.

  12. 12.

    For details about the HIAT transcription system see Ehlich and Rehbein (1976, in German) and Ehlich (1992, in English).

  13. 13.

    The professional ‘maxim knowledge’ (Ehlich and Rehbein 1977a) of the agent can be explored as the origin of this third-party will, which comes into effect due to the patient’s increased blood sugar levels.

  14. 14.

    For a detailed determination of the power of the conjunctive form in German, cf. Redder (1992).

References

  • Agyemang, C., Beune, E., Meeks, K., Addo, J., Aikins, A. D., Bahendeka, S., et al. (2016). Innovative ways of studying the effect of migration on obesity and diabetes beyond the common designs: Lessons from the RODAM study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1391(1), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloh, F. (2018). Improving diabetes outcome: A need to understand management among Africans living with diabetes in the UK. Journal of Primary Health Care and General Practice, 2(1). https://scientonline.org/open-access/improving-diabetes-outcome-a-need-to-understand-management-among-africans-living-with-diabetes-in-the-uk.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2019.

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, F. (2018). Typ-2-Diabetes und Migranten: Menschen aus verschiedenen Sprach- und Kulturräumen. Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel,13(3), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergis, N., Ehrmann, D., Hermanns, N., & Haak, T. (2012). Lässt sich Empowerment bei Menschen mit Diabetes messen? Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel,7, 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, H. (1971). Die deutsche Sprache—Gestalt und Leistung. Düsseldorf: Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünner, G. (2011). Gesundheit durchs Fernsehen. Linguistische Untersuchungen zur Vermittlung medizinischen Wissens und Aufklärung in Gesundheitssendungen. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1982). Sprachtheorie. Zur Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer (First publication 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührig, K. (1996). Reformulierende Handlungen. Zur Analyse sprachlicher Adaptierungprozesse in institutioneller Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührig, K. (2005). ‘Speech action patterns’ and ‘discourse types’. Folia Linguistica, XXXIX/1–2, 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührig, K., Kliche, O., Pawlack, B., & Meyer, B. (2012). The corpus “Interpreting in Hospitals”: Possible applications for research and communication training. In T. Schmidt & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual corpora and multilingual corpus analysis (pp. 305–315). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bührig, K., Fienemann, J., & Schlickau, S. (2017). Zu einigen Charakteristika von Diabetesberatungen. In A. Krause, G. Lehmann, W. Thielmann, & C. Trautmann (Eds.), Form und Funktion. Festschrift für Angelika Redder zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 533–546). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danne, T. (2013). Vorwort. In diabetesDE—Deutsche Diabetes-Hilfe (Ed.), Deutscher Gesundheitsbericht. Diabetes 2013 (pp. 6–9). Berlin: Kirchheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care, 41(12), 2669–2701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. K., Guzman, S. J., Maryniuk, M. D., O’Brian, C. A., Kadohiro, J. K., Jackson, R. A., et al. (2017). The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care,40(12), 1790–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring, M. (2010). Konzeptualisierung(en) des Metabolischen Syndroms: Versuch einer diskurshistorischen Analyse über ein zeitgenössisches Syndromkonzept. In M. Langwiler & J. Madarász (Eds.), Das präventive Selbst. Eine Kulturgeschichte moderner Gesundheitspolitik (pp. 325–353). Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K. (1979). Verwendungen der Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K. (1986). Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse—Ziele und Verfahren. In W.-D. Hartung (Ed.), Untersuchungen zur Kommunikation—Ergebnisse und Perspektiven (pp. 15–40). Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K. (1992). HIAT—A transcription system for discourse data. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 123–148). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1972). Einige Interrelationen von Modalverben. In D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Linguistische Pragmatik (pp. 318–340). Frankfurt a. M.: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1976). Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT). Linguistische Berichte,45, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1977a). Wissen, kommunikatives Handeln und die Schule. In H. C. Goeppert (Ed.), Sprachverhalten im Unterricht (pp. 36–114). München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1977b). Batterien sprachlicher Handlungen. In Journatul aof Pragmatics 1(4), 393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1979). Sprachliche Handlungsmuster. In H.-G. Soeffner (Ed.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften (pp. 243–274). Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1986). Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zu schulischer Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1974). Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funnel, M. M., Anderson, R. M., Arnold, M. S., Barr, P. A., Donnelly, M., Johnson, P. D., Taylor-Moon, D., & White, N. H. (1991). Empowerment. An idea whose time has come in diabetes education. The Diabetes Educator, 17(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grießhaber, W. (2001). Verfahren und Tendenzen der funktional-pragmatischen Diskursanalyse. Vom Speiserestaurant zum Cybercafé. In Z. Ivanyi & A. Kertész (Eds.), Gesprächsforschung: Tendenzen und Perspektiven (pp. 75–95). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guell, C. (2011). Candi(e)d action: Biosocialities and Turkish berliners living with diabetes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly,25(3), 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heesen, C., Berger, B., Hamann, J., & Kasper, J. (2006). Empowerment, Adhärenz, evidenzbasierte Patienteninformation und partizipative Entscheidungsfindung bei MS—Schlagworte oder Wegweiser? Neurologie und Rehabilitation,4, 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipper, M., & Bilgin, Y. (2009). Migration und Gesundheit. Bonn: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofahl, C., von dem Knesebeck, O., Hollmann, J., & Mnich, E. (2013). Diabetesspezifische Gesundheitskompetenz: Was wissen türkischstämmige Menschen mit Diabetes mellitus 2 über ihre Erkrankung? Das Gesundheitswesen,75(12), 803–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulzer, B. (2013). Nationaler Diabetesplan. In diabetesDE—Deutsche Diabetes-Hilfe (Ed.), Deutscher Gesundheitsbericht. Diabetes 2013 (pp. 196–205). Berlin: Krichheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalouschek, J. (2013). Anliegensklärung im ärztlichen Gespräch—Patientenbeteiligung und neue Formen medizinischer Kommunikation. In F. Menz (Ed.), Migration und medizinische Kommunikation. Linguistische Verfahren der Patientenbeteiligung und Verständnissicherung in ärztlichen Gesprächen mit MigrantInnen (pp. 353–444). Wien: V & R University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalouschek, J., & Brünner, G. (2010). Von der Selbskasteiung zum Genuss. Zum Wandel der Diskurse über Diät und richtige Ernährung in Gesundheitssendungen des Fernsehens. In R. de Cillia, H. Gruber, M. Krzyżanowski, & F. Menz (Eds.), Diskurs, Politik, Identität. Festschrift für Ruth Wodak (pp. 137–147). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laube, H., Bayraktar, H., Gökce, Y., Akinci, A., Erkal, Z., Bödeker, R., et al. (2004). Zur Diabeteshäufigkeit unter türkischen Migranten in Deutschland. Darmstadt: Merck Pharma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Sundquist, J., Zöller, B., Benneta, L., & Sundquist, K. (2013). Risk of hospitalization for type 2 diabetes in first- and second-generation immigrants in Sweden: A nationwide follow-up study. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications,27(1), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Łuczyński, W., Głowińska-Olszewska, B., & Bossowski, A. (2016). Empowerment in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. Journal of diabetes research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5671492.

  • Meeks, K. A. C., Freitas-Da-Silva, D., Adeyemo, A., Beune, E. J. A. J., Modesti, P. A., Stronks, K., et al. (2016). Disparities in type 2 diabetes prevalence among ethnic minority groups resident in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal and Emergency Medicine,11(3), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. (n. d.) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prescription. Accessed 3 May 2019.

  • Müller, L. (2009). Das Informationsverhalten von Diabetespatienten. Hamburg: Diplomica.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. (2018). Language matters: Language and diabetes. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/language-matters.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2019.

  • Perez-Rodriguez, M., Ramirez-Palacios, P., Salmeron, J., & Talavera, J. (2017). Dietary patterns associated with incidence of metabolic syndrome and its components. The FASEB Journal, 31(1)_supplement, lb348–lb348. https://www.fasebj.org/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.lb348. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Pooley, C. G., Gerrard, C., Hollis, C., Morton, S., & Astbury, J. (2001). “Oh It’s a wonderful practice. you can talk to them”: A qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ views on the management of type 2 diabetes. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(4), 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology,15(2), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, M. W. (1984). Teaching toward compliance: A patient’s perspective. The Diabetes Educator,10, 42–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redder, A. (1984). Modalverben im Unterrichtsdiskurs. Pragmatik der Modalverben am Beispiel eines institutionellen Diskurses. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Redder, A. (1990). Grammatik und sprachliches Handeln:denn‘ und,da‘. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Redder, A. (1992). Funktional-grammatischer Aufbau des Verb-Systems im Deutschen. In L. Hoffmann (Ed.) Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten (pp. 128–154). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redder, A. (2008). Functional Pragmatics. In G. Antos & E. Ventola (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 133–178). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (1977). Komplexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorie von Sprache. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (1978). Ankündigungen. Germanistische Linguistik. Varia V., 339–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (1981). Announcing—On formulating plans. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine (pp. 215–258). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (1998). Die Verwendung von Institutionensprache in Ämtern und Behörden. In L. Hoffmann, H. Kalverkämper, & E. H. Wiegand (Eds.), Fachsprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Fachsprachenforschung und Terminologiewissenschaft (pp. 660–675). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (2001). Das Konzept der Diskursanalyse. In K. Brinker, G. Antos, W. Heinemann, & S. F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Linguistics of Text and Conversation. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Vol. 2, pp. 927–945). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, J. (2004). Matrix-Konstruktionen in Diskurs und Text. In N. Baumgarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz, & J. Probst (Eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und SprachvermittlungDas Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 251–275). Bochum: AKS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1942). Counselling and Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, E., Walter, I., & Rappold, E. (2007). Diabetes. Der Umgang mit einer chronischen Krankheit. Wien: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, F. A., Kerr C., Murray, E., & Nazareth, I. (2007). Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: The patient perspective – a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice (2007)8: 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-47.

  • Stirbu, I., Kunst, A. E., Bos, V., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2006). Differences in avoidable mortality between migrants and the native Dutch in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 6(78) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1435889. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

  • Ujcic-Voortman, J. K., Schram, M. T., Jacobs-van Der Bruggen, M. A., Verhoeff, A. P., & Baan, C. A. (2009). Diabetes prevalence and risk factors among ethnic minorities. European Journal of Public Health,19(5), 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dulmen, A. M., Verhaak, P. F. M., & Bilo, H. J. G. (1997). Shifts in doctor-patient-communication in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counselling,30, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Bührig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bührig, K., Fienemann, J., Schlickau, S. (2020). On Certain Characteristics of ‘Diabetes Consultations’. In: Hohenstein, C., Lévy-Tödter, M. (eds) Multilingual Healthcare. FOM-Edition(). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27120-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics