Skip to main content

Light at the end of the tunnel: Eurozone bailouts and satisfaction with democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Social Model under Pressure

Abstract

How did the Eurozone bailouts affect national democracies? Recent research, including by Klaus Armingeon and his colleagues, indicates strong citizen detachment from democracy due to the external constraints imposed by bailout programs on national autonomy. This chapter re-examines the detachment thesis with the help of the generalized synthetic control method. We confirm the strong negative effect of bailouts on satisfaction with democracy, but show that the effect diminishes substantially after a number of years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abadie, Alberto, Alexis Diamond, and Jens Hainmueller. 2010. “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (490): 493–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Besir Ceka. 2014. “The Loss of Trust in the European Union during the Great Recession since 2007: The Role of Heuristics from the National Political System.” European Union Politics 15 (1): 82– 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “How the Euro Divides the Union: The Effect of Economic Adjustment on Support for Democracy in Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Jushan. 2009. “Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 77 (4): 1229–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, Anna, and Susannah Verney. 2012. “Electoral Epidemic: The Political Cost of Economic Crisis in Southern Europe, 2010-11.” South European Society and Politics 17 (2): 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brack, Nathalie, and Nicholas Startin. 2015. “Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the Margins to the Mainstream.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero, Guillermo, and Pablo Simón. 2016. “Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe.” West European Politics 39 (2): 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copelovitch, Mark, Jeffry Frieden, and Stefanie Walter. 2016. “The Political Economy of the Euro Crisis.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (7): 811–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasonneville, Ruth, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck. 2014. “Macroeconomics, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes: A National European Pool.” Acta Politica 49 (4): 372–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debomy, Daniel. 2013. EU No, Euro Yes? European Public Opinions Facing the Crisis (2007-2012). Paris: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, Raymond M., and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, Jeffry, and Stefanie Walter. 2017. “Understanding the Political Economy of the Eurozone crisis.” Annual Review of Political Science 20 (1): 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja, Thomas Kurer, and Bruno Wüest. 2018. “Participation in Hard Times: How Constrained Government Depresses Turnout among the Highly Educated.” West European Politics 41 (2): 448–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Enrique, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2016. “The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmidis, Spyros. 2018. “International Constraints and Electoral Decisions: Does the Room to Maneuver Attenuate Economic Voting?” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2007. “Economic Models of Voting.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 518–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijs, Matthias. 2017. “Integration at What Price? The Erosion of National Democracy in the Euro Periphery.” Government and Opposition 52 (2): 266–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz Steffen. 2018. imputeTS: Time Series Missing Value Imputation. R package version 2.6, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=imputeTS.

  • Petersen, Thiess, and Michael Böhmer. 2012. Economic Impact of Southern European Member States Exiting the Eurozone (Future Social Market Economy Policy Brief 2012/06). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Berthold, and Thomas Winzen. 2015. “Parlamentarismus nach der Krise: Die Vertiefung parlamentarischer Asymmetrie in der reformierten Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56 (3): 430–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Rufino, Rubén, and Sonia Alonso. 2017. “Democracy without Choice: Citizens’ Perceptions of Government Autonomy during the Eurozone Crisis.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 320–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2011. Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy (MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 11/11). Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. “Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2015. “The Forgotten Problem of Democratic Legitimacy. ‘Governing by the Rules’ and ‘Ruling by the Numbers’.” In The Future of the Euro, edited by Matthias Matthijs and Mark Blyth, 90–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Yiqing. 2017. “Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models.” Political Analysis 25 (1): 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Schimmelfennig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schimmelfennig, F., Schraff, D. (2020). Light at the end of the tunnel: Eurozone bailouts and satisfaction with democracy. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics