Skip to main content

Who cares? The limited effect of liberalization on satisfaction with democracy in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The European Social Model under Pressure

Abstract

The relationship between states and markets has changed over the past 30 years. While markets have pressed forward in many traditional policy domains of governments, states became smaller, less centralized, and opened up their national economies. In other words, we have witnessed far-reaching liberalization procedures in Western democracies across all major policy fields. How did these liberalizations affect society and democracy? Some scholars argue that increasing liberalization undermines legal systems, political power structures, and democratic processes of nation states. Yet, even if liberalization does undermine democracy, does the associated reduction in the regulatory activity of the democratic state have a negative impact on citizens’ satisfaction with democracy? This is the question guiding our contribution, which analyzes the effects of liberalization on national democratic satisfaction in 25 developed democracies between 1985 and 2014. We conduct a large-n pooled times-series cross-sectional analysis based on aggregated surveys from the Eurobarometer, and on a novel liberalization data set that captures liberalizing and de-liberalizing reform changes in 13 major policy fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Lucio Baccaro. 2012a. “Political Economy of the Sovereign Debt Crisis: The Limits of Internal Devaluation.” Industrial Law Journal 41 (3): 254–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Lucio Baccaro. 2012b. “The Sorrows of Young Euro: Policy Responses to the Sovereign Debt Crisis.” In Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, edited by Nancy Bermeo and Jonas Pontusson, 162-197. New York: Russel Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Lucio Baccaro, Anna Fill, Jorge Galindo, Stefan Heeb, and Rafael Labanino. 2019. Liberalization Database 1997-2013 (pre-published version). Available online by summer 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Kai Guthmann. 2014. “Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries 2007-2011.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 423-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2015. “Wie der Euro Europa spaltet. Die Krise der gemeinsamen Währung und die Entfremdung von der Demokratie in der Europäischen Union.” PVS Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56 (3): 506-531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “How the Euro Divides the Union: The Effect of Economic Adjustment on Support for Democracy in Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 1-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler. 2018. “Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2016.” Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, Lucio, and Chris Howell. 2011. “A Common Neoliberal Trajectory: The Transformation of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalism.” Politics & Society 39 (4): 521-563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, Lucio, and Chris Howell. 2017. Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R. 2013. “Ideas and Policy Change.” Governance 26 (2): 239-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz. 2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (1): 331-352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, Judith, Francisco Comín, and Daniel Díaz Fuentes. 2006. “Privatizing Public Enterprises in the European Union 1960–2002: Ideological, Pragmatic, Inevitable?” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (5): 736-756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert. 2004. “The Path-dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct.” Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 204-219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, Ben. 2013. “Saving the Euro at the Cost of Democracy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (4): 614-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper, Pepper D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry, and David Leblang. 2008. “Democracy and Globalization.” Economics & Politics 20 (3): 289-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fill, Anna. 2019. The Political Economy of De-liberalization. A Comparative Study on Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. “Shrinking States? Globalization and Policy Autonomy in the OECD.” Oxford Development Studies 26 (1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthmann, Kai. 2019. Adjustment without Choice: Fiscal Consolidation in the Euro Crisis. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2011. Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1939. “The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism.” In Individualism and Economic Order, 255-272. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, Martin, Alexander Petring, Daniel Seikel, and Benjamin Werner. 2011. “Liberalisierungspolitik.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63 (1):1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1795. Perpetual Peace and other Essays on Politics, History and Morals. New York: Cosimo Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Berthold Rittberger, eds. 2007. Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbom, Anders. 2001. “Dismantling the Social Democratic Welfare Model? Has the Swedish Welfare State Lost Its Defining Characteristics?” Scandinavian Political Studies 24 (3): 171-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Oscar. 1994. “Toward Trade Opening.” In Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe, edited by Joan M. Nelson, 61-104. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, Kevin H., and Alan M. Taylor. 2006. “Democracy and Protectionism.” NBER Working Paper No. 12250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1987. Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. 2nd ed. Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2013a. “Legitimacy Intermediation in the Multilevel European Polity and Its Collapse in the Euro Crisis.” In Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, edited by Klaus Armingeon, 567-597. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2013b. “Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Disabling of Democratic Accountability.” In Politics in the Age of Austerity, edited by Armin Schäfer and Wolfgang Streeck, 108-142. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2014. “Comment: The Eurocrisis as a Victory of Neoliberalism?” In The European Union in Crises or the European Union as Crises?, edited by John E. Fossum and Augustín. J. Menéndez. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2015. “After the Crash: A Perspective on Multilevel European Democracy.” European Law Journal 21 (3): 384-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth, and Zachary Elkins. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 171-189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 2010. Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Miaojie. 2006. “Trade Globalization and Political Liberalization: A Gravity Approach.” TIGER Working Paper No. 104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Guthmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guthmann, K., Fill, A. (2020). Who cares? The limited effect of liberalization on satisfaction with democracy in Europe. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics