Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Autonome Waffensysteme – ethische und völkerrechtliche Problemstellungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unbemannte Waffen und ihre ethische Legitimierung

Part of the book series: Gerechter Frieden ((GEFR))

Zusammenfassung

Autonome Waffensysteme markieren eine militärtechnologische Zeitenwende. Die Ankündigungen einiger Staaten, allen voran der USA, künftig verstärkt auf autonome Militärtechnologie zu setzen, haben in den vergangenen Jahren eine internationale Debatte über die ethischen und rechtlichen Implikationen solcher Systeme angestoßen. Dabei hat sich die Debatte bislang in erster Linie auf Kampfroboter (Lethal Autonomous Robots beziehungsweise Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, LAWS) konzentriert, das heißt auf autonome Entscheidungen am Ende der militärischen Entscheidungskette im Zusammenhang mit der Auswahl und dem Angriff konkreter Ziele.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alston, Philip. 2012. Lethal Robotic Technologies: The Implications for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Law, Information & Science 21 (2): 35 – 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, Ronald C. 2011. Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. Technical Report GITGVU07 – 11. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robotlab/onlinepublications/formalizationv35.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Februar 2015.

  • Asaro, Peter M. 2012. On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 687 – 709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothby, William H. 2014. Conflict Law: The Influence of New Weapons Technology. Den Haag: Asser Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament. 2014. Entschließung zum Einsatz von bewaffneten Drohnen. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=//EP//TEXT+MOTION+P7RC2014-0201+0+DOC+XML+V0//DE. Zugegriffen: 10. Februar 2015.

  • Ford, Paul. 2015. Our Fear of Artificial Intelligence. http://www.technologyreview.com/review/534871/ourfearofartificialintelligence/. Zugegriffen: 16. Februar 2015.

  • Geiß, Robin. 2015. Die völkerrechtliche Dimension autonomer Waffensysteme. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. 2014. Autonomous Weapon Systems under International Law. Academy Briefing No. 8. http://www.genevaacademy.ch/academypublications/academybriefings/1190briefingno8autonomousweaponssystemsunderinternationallaw. Zugegriffen: 10. Februar 2015.

  • Goodman, Ryan. 2013. The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants. European Journal of International Law 24 (3): 819 – 853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Dave. 1995. On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyns, Christof. 2016. Comments of the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitral Executions. Informal Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Conventional Weapons Convention. https://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/1869331AFF45728BC1257E2D0050EFE0/$file/2015_LAWS_MX_Heyns_Transcript.pdf. Zugegriffen: 28. April 2016.

  • Melzer, Nils. 2009. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law. https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc002-0990.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Februar 2015.

  • Melzer, Nils. 2010. Keeping the Balance Be tween Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 42 (831): 833 – 916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried. 2013. Neue Kampfsysteme und die Ethik des Krieges. http://www.boell.de/de/node/277436. Zugegriffen: 11. Februar 2015.

  • O’Connell, Mary Ellen. 2014. Banning Autonomous Killing: The Legal and Ethical Requirement That Humans Make Near-Time Lethal Decisions. In The American Way of Bombing. Changing Ethical and Legal Norms, from Flying Fortresses to Drones, hrsg. von Matthew Evangelista und Henry Shue, 224 – 299. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, W. Hays. 2010. Part IX of the ICRC Direct Participation in Hostilities Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 42 (769): 770 – 830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, Niels. 2012. Human Dignity, International Protection. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, hrsg. von Rüdiger Wolfrum, 1 – 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassòli, Marco. 2014. Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to be Clarified. International Law Studies 90: 308 – 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharre, Paul. 2011. Why Unmanned. Joint Force Quarterly 61 (2): 89 – 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Michael N. 2013. Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: A Reply to the Critics. http://harvardnsj.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/SchmittAutonomousWeaponSystemsandIHLFinal.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Februar 2015.

  • Sharkey, Noel E. 2012. The Evitability of Autonomous Robot Warfare. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 787 – 799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Law School and NYU School of Law. 2012. Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan. http://www.livingunderdrones.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/10/StanfordNYULivingUnderDrones.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Februar 2015.

  • Zimmermann, Andreas und Robin Geiß. 2007. Die Tötung unbeteiligter Zivilisten: Menschenunwürdig im Frieden – menschenwürdig im Krieg ? Der Staat 46 (3): 377 – 393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Glasgow, Scotland, Großbritannien

    Robin Geiß

Authors
  1. Robin Geiß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Geiß .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Forschungsstätte der Evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft e.V., Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Ines-Jacqueline Werkner

  2. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany

    Marco Hofheinz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geiß, R. (2019). Autonome Waffensysteme – ethische und völkerrechtliche Problemstellungen. In: Werkner, IJ., Hofheinz, M. (eds) Unbemannte Waffen und ihre ethische Legitimierung. Gerechter Frieden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26947-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26947-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26946-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26947-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation