Skip to main content

A moral being is an accountable being: Leadership and accountability in monastic organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Benedictine monasteries are one of the most durable forms of communal life that can be found on almost all continents. They had a major impact on the economic development of European countries and helped to develop a new understanding of work morale, leadership, and governance structures. Nowadays, the Benedictine family includes approximately 7,000 monks and 16,000 nuns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2007). Liminal ethnography: Understanding segregated organizations. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2(2), 126-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 356-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckmann, A. (2006a). Qualifications of the monastery cellarer – (RB 31): Part I. The American Benedictine Review, 57(1), 18-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckmann, A. (2006b). Qualifications of the monastery cellarer – (RB 31): Part II. The American Benedictine Review, 57(2), 186-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, T. W. (2005). The effects of identity-relevance and task difficulty on task motivation, stress, and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 29(3), 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. C. A., McBey, K., & Scott-Ladd, B. (2011). Ethical leadership in modern employment relationships: Lessons from St. Benedict. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 221-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, A. N., & Schlenker, B. R. (2005). The protestant work ethic and attributions of responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(7), 1502-1518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derkse, W. (2000). Listening and responding: Benedictine spirituality in non-monastic contexts. A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, 3(3), 194-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., Sandberger, S., & Neulinger, M. (2012). Sustainability for centuries – monastic governance of Austrian Benedictine abbeys. European Journal of Management, 12(3), 24-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, J. R. (2008). Social class in Saint Benedict’s monastery. Cistercian Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 199-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundation Benedict (n.d.). Die Benediktiner und ihre Organisation, http://foundation-benedict.org/die-benediktiner-und-ihre-organisation, accessed 06.02.2019.

  • Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, J. J. O. (1992). Abbatial leadership. The American Benedictine Review, 43(1), 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidice, R. M., Mero, N. P., & Greene, J. V. (2013). Perceptions of accountability in family business: Using accountability theory to understand differences between family and nonfamily executives. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(4): 233-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). Accountability and extra-role behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(2), 131-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 204-224.\

    Google Scholar 

  • Inauen, E., Rost, K., Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2010b). Monastic governance: Forgotten prospects for public institutions, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 631-653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inauen, E., Rost, K., Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2010a). Back to the future – A monastic perspective on corporate governance. Management Revue, 21(1), 38-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janotík, T. (2012). Benedictine monasteries from the point of view of happiness economics. Economics Bulletin, 32(2), 1215-1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K. (2016). A moral being is an accountable being: Ethical leadership and accountability in monastic organizations. Unpublished dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K. (2017). Ethical leadership from a monastic perspective: When everything new is well-forgotten old. Paper presented at the Academy of Management 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2016a). Monastic approach to governance and leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Strategic Management, 16(1), 39-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2016b). A moral being is an accountable being: Accountability and ethics in monastic organizations. Paper presented at Academy of Management 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2019). Corporate governance and leadership from a monastic perspective: A literature review. In P. Trianni, B. Sawicki OSB, T. Quartier OSB, Isabelle Jonveaux (Eds). Monasticism and Economy: Rediscovering an Approach to Work and Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keplinger, K., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., Sandberger, S., & Neulinger, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial activities of Benedictine monasteries – a special form of family business? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 8(4), 317-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleymann, B., & Malloch, H. (2010). The rule of Saint Benedict and corporate management: employing the whole person. Journal of Global Responsibility, 1(2), 207-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion, F. M. (1996). Benedictine economics and the challenge of modernity. The American Benedictine Review, 47(1), 14-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • Mercier, G. & Deslandes, G. (2017). There are no codes, only Interpretations. Practical wisdom and hermeneutics in monastic organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(4), 781-794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSB (2019). OSB Atlas, http://www.osbatlas.com/default.asp?id=352, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • Payer-Langthaler, S., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2013). Towards a definition of performance for religious organizations and beyond: A case of Benedictine abbeys. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 10(3/4), 213-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzetti, J. J. (2014). Governance in the cloister: Lessons from the Rule of Benedict for sustainable leadership in communal organizations. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 11(3) 25-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • RB: Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 2, http://www.osb.org/rb/text/rbejms1.html#2, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • RB: Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 58, http://www.osb.org/rb/text/rbeaad2.html#58, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • RB: Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 27, http://archive.osb.org/rb/text/rbemjo1.html#27, accessed 16.04.2019.

  • RB: Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 64, http://www.osb.org/rb/text/rbeaad2.html#64, ac-cessed 19.02.2019.

  • RB: Rule of St. Benedict, Chapter 70, http://archive.osb.org/rb/text/rbeaad3.html#70, accessed 16.04.2019.

  • Rippinger, J. (1992). A monastic questionnaire: Reflections of retired abbots. The American Benedictine Review, 43(4), 429-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, K., Inauen, E., Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2010). The corporate governance of Benedictine abbeys. Journal of Management History, 16 (1), 90-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101(4), 632-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. (2012). Monastic values and echoes of the Rule of Benedict in the Statutes of 1365 for the Cluniac College at Paris. The American Benedictine Review, 63(3), 331-353.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Friends of St. Benedict (2019). The Rule of St. Benedict, http://www.benedictfriend.org/article/3/the-rule-of-st-benedict, accessed 19.02.2019.

  • Tomaine, J. (2015). St. Benedict’s toolbox: The nuts and bolts of everyday Benedictine living. New York, NY: Morehouse Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toor, S., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533-547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredget, D. A. (2002). “The Rule of Benedict” and its relevance to the world of work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(3), 219-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. E. (2000). Moral person and moral manager. Contemporary Issues in Leadership, 42(4), 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, M. (2012). Sustainability, values and quality of life what we can learn from Christian communities. Philosophia Reformata, 77(2), 114-134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ksenia Keplinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Keplinger, K. (2019). A moral being is an accountable being: Leadership and accountability in monastic organizations. In: Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., Wolf, T., Neulinger OSB, M. (eds) Unternehmen und Klöster. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26694-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26694-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26693-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26694-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics