Skip to main content

Assisted / autonomous vs. human driving assessment on the DiM driving simulator using objective / subjective characterization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover 10th International Munich Chassis Symposium 2019

Abstract

More and more sophisticated assisted/autonomous vehicles are becoming available in the market. Automation levels 2 and 3 have been given for settled just a couple of years ago, and the path to fully autonomous car seemed to have no obstacles. In reality, OEMs started recently realizing that the impact of semi and/or fully robotized cars on drivers as well as on passengers is all but predictable. VI-grade has more than ten years experience with developing turn-key solution driving simulators, and has been working for more than five years on a research project to collect meaningful bio-signals from the driver during simulator sessions, in collaboration with the BACPIC of the Catholic University of Sacred Heart and the DPIA of the University of Udine. Recently, a collaboration with the Human Inspired Technology Research Center of University of Padova allowed the extension of the assessment at physio-emotional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • [1] A. Affanni, “Wearable instrument to measure simultaneously cardiac and electrodermal activities”, IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, MeMeA 2016 - Proceedings, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • [2] A. Affanni and G. Chiorboli, “Wearable instrument for skin potential response analysis in AAL applications”, 20th IMEKO TC4 Symposiu-m on Measurements of Electrical Quantities: Research on Electrical and Electronic Measurement for the Economic Upturn, Together with 18th TC4 International Workshop on ADC and DCA Modeling and Testing, IWADC 2014, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • [3] A. Affanni and G. Chiorboli, “Design and characterization of a real-time, wearable, endosomatic electrodermal system”, Measurement, vol. 75, pp.111-121, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • [4] A. Affanni, G. Chiorboli, and D. Minen, “Motion artifact removal in stress sensors used in driver in motion simulators ”, Medical Measurements and Applications (Me-MeA), 2016 IEEE International Symposium on, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • [5] A. Affanni, R. Bernardini, A. Piras, R. Rinaldo, and P. Zontone, “Drivers stress detection using skin potential response signals”, Measurement, vol. 122, pp. 264-274, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • [6] http://docs.gestionaweb.cat/1662/catalogo-magneti-marelli-2017.pdf

  • [7] Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of pacing and Electrophysiology.Heart rate variability. Standards measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • [8] . Lombardi, F., & Stein, P. K. (2011). Origin of heart rate variability and turbulence: an appraisal of autonomic modulation of cardiovascular function.Front Physiol, 2, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • [9] Wright, S., Ward, N. J., & Cohn, A. G. (2002). Enhanced presence in driving simulators using autonomous traffic with virtual personalities. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11(6), 578-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • [10] Lin, J. W., Duh, H. B. L., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., & Furness, T. A. (2002). Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings ieee virtual reality 2002 (pp. 164-171). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • [11] Hess, A., Jung, J., Maier, A., Taib, R., Yu, K., & Itzstein, B. (2013, June). Elicitation of mental states and user experience factors in a driving simulator. In 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 43-48). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • [12] Schultheis, M. T., Rebimbas, J., Mourant, R., & Millis, S. R. (2007). Examining the usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assistive Technology, 19(1), 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • [13] Robillard, G., Bouchard, S., Fournier, T., & Renaud, P. (2003). Anxiety and presence during VR immersion: A comparative study of the reactions of phobic and nonphobic participants in therapeutic virtual environments derived from computer games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(5), 467-476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Affani, A. et al. (2020). Assisted / autonomous vs. human driving assessment on the DiM driving simulator using objective / subjective characterization. In: Pfeffer, P. (eds) 10th International Munich Chassis Symposium 2019. Proceedings. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26435-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26435-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26434-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26435-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics