Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engagement – Voraussetzung für kollaboratives Innovieren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kooperative Dienstleistungen

Part of the book series: Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement ((FD))

  • 5876 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Diese explorative Fallstudie erweitert das aktuelle Verständnis des Engagements von Akteuren in unternehmensübergreifenden Innovationsprojekten. Basierend auf den empirischen Daten, werden vier persönliche sowie sechs inter-organisationale Faktoren identifiziert, welche das Engagement von Akteuren beeinflussen. Anschließend werden zukünftige Forschungsrichtungen identifiziert und erläutert. Zudem wird aufgezeigt, dass Engagement abhängig vom Akteur und der jeweiligen interorganisationalen Umgebung variiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aal, K./Di Pietro, L./Edvardsson, B./Renzi, M. F./Guglielmetti Mugion, R. (2016): Innovation in service ecosystems – An empirical study of the integration of values, brands, service systems and experience rooms, in: Journal of Service Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, S. 619-651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, R.S./Kotler, P. (1999): Marketing in the Network Economy, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, No. 1, S. 146-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2006): Engaging the inventor – Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, S. 63-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M./Jaakkola, E. (2015): Customer Engagement Behaviuors and Value Co-creation, in: Brodie, R.J./Hollebeek, L.D./Conduit, J. (Hrsg.): Customer Engagement – Contemporary Issues and Challenges, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C./von Hippel, E. (2011): Modeling a Paradigm Shift – From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation, in: Organization Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, S. 1399-1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechky, B.A. (2003): Coordination as the practice of organizational accountability and common ground, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2003, No. 1, S. 11-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S./Lissoni, F. (2009): Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks– An anatomy of localized knowledge flows, in: Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 9 No. 4, S. 439-468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breidbach, C.F./Brodie, R./Hollebeek, L. (2014): Beyond virtuality – from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems, in: Managing Service Quality – An International Journal, Vol. 24, No. 6, S. 592-611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J./Hollebeek, L.D./Juric, B./Ilic, A. (2011): Customer Engagement – Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, S. 252-271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J./Ilic, A./Juric, B./Hollebeek, L. (2013): Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community – An exploratory analysis, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, No. 1, S. 105-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S./Duguid, P. (1998): Organizing Knowledge, in: California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, S. 90-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, J./Cook, J. (2006): It’s good to talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes, in: Business Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 2, S. 154-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (2009): Structural holes – The social structure of competition, Cambridge/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.D./Lusch, R.F. (2014): Service Systems – A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, S. 6-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, G./Wong, M.L./Wan, X. (2015): Targeting High Value Customers While Under Resource Constraint – Partial Order Constrained Optimization with Genetic Algorithm, in: Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 1, S. 27-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K.S./Emerson, R.M. (1978): Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 43, No. 5, S. 721-739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, C.E. (2014): The Principle of Good Faith – Toward Substantive Stakeholder Engagement, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 121, No. 2, S. 283-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J. (2011): Comment. Customer Engagement – Essence, Dimensionality, and Boundaries, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, S. 280-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J./Lemon, K.N./Mittal, V./Nass, S./Pick, D./Pirner, P./Verhoef, P.C. (2010): Customer engagement behavior – Theoretical foundations and research directions, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, S. 253-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. (1992): A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. S1, S. 77-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F.R./Schurr, P.H./Oh, S. (1987): Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No. 2, S. 11-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverri, P. (2017): In Situ Methodology – Outlining a New Direction for Service Research, in: European Review of Service Economics and Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, S. 77-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B./Kleinaltenkamp, M./Tronvoll, B./McHugh, P./Windahl, C. (2014): Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration, in: Marketing Theory, Vol. 14, No. 3, S. 291-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B./Tronvoll, B./Gruber, T. (2011): Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation – A social construction approach, in: Journal of the Acad-emy of Marketing Science, Vol. 39, No. 2, S. 327-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M./Graebner, M.E. (2007): Theory building from cases – Opportunities and challenges, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, S. 25-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1962): Power-dependence relations, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, S. 31-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A./Frey, J.H. (1994): Interviewing – The art of science, in: Denzin, N./Lincoln, Y. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, S. 361-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984): Strategic Management – A Stakeholder Approach, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frow, P./Payne, A. (2011): A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, No. 1/2, S. 223-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frow, P./Nenonen, S./Payne, A./Storbacka, K. (2015): Managing co‐creation design – A strategic approach to innovation, in: British Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, S. 463-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfridsson, P. (2012): Joint service development – the creations of the prerequisite for the service development, in: Managing Service Quality – An International Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, S. 21-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R.W. (2012): Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement, in: Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, Vol. 7, No. 3, S.1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985): Economic Action and Social Strucutre – The Problem of Embeddedness, in: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, S. 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C.R./Lusch, R.F./Vargo, S.L. (2016): A service perspective – Key managerial insights from service-dominant (S-D) logic, in: Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 1, S. 28-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1994): From scientific management to service management – a management perspective for the age of service competition, in: International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, S. 5-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G./Lincoln, Y.S. (1994): Competing paradigms in qualitative research, in: Denzin, N./Lincoln, Y. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, S. 105-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H./Snehota, I. (1989): No business is an island – The network concept of business strategy, in: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, S. 187-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H./Waluszewski, A. (2007): Knowledge and Innovation in Business and Industry – The Importance of Using Others, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B./Kelley M.R./Gant J. (1996): Innovative firm behavior and local milieu – exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change, in: Economic Geography, Vol. 72, No. 3, S. 233-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L.D. (2011): Demystifying customer brand engagement – Exploring the loyalty nexus, in: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 27, No. 7/8, S. 785-807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L.D./Conduit, J./Brodie, R.J. (2016): Strategic drivers, anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of customer engagement, in: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol 32, No. 5/6, S. 393-398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, E./Alexander, M. (2014): The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation – A Service System Perspective, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, S. 247-261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S.D./Anderson, E. (2007): Testing a Life-Cycle Theory of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships – Movement Across Stages and Performance, in: Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 2, S. 260-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, J.M./Roth, A./Möslein, K.M. (2016): Stakeholder Integration for Service Innovation in German Medium-Sized Enterprises, in: Service Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, S. 320-332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, J.M./Boha, J./Sörhammar, D./Möslein, K.M. (2018): Stakeholder engagement in intra-and inter-organizational innovation – Exploring antecedents of engagement in service ecosystems, in: Journal of Service Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, S. 399-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W.A. (1990): Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 334, S. 692-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G./Shneiderman, B. (1998): Engagement theory – A framework for technologybased teaching and learning, in: Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No. 5, S. 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D./Lee, R.P. (2010): Systems Collaboration and Strategic Collaboration – Their Impacts on Supply Chain Responsiveness and Market Performance, in: Decision Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, S. 955-981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J./Oerlemans, L.A.G. (2006): Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration – A literature review, in: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 2, S. 71-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela-Huotari, K./Vargo, S.L. (2016): Institutions as resource context, in: Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 26, No. 2, S. 163-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C./Kindström, D./Carlborg, P. (2016): Triadic value propositions – When it takes more than two to tango, in: Service Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, S. 282-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalkowski, C./Witell, L./Gustafsson, A. (2013): Any way goes – Identifying value constellations for service infusion in SMEs, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 42, No. 1, S. 18-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M./Olson, D.L./Trimi, S. (2012): Co-Innovation – Convergenenomics, collaboration and co-creation for organizational values, in: Management Decision, Vol. 50, No. 5, S. 817-831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S./Guba, E.G. (1985): Establishing Trustworthiness, in: Lincoln, Y.S./Guba, E.G. (Hrsg.): Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, S. 289-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R.F./Nambisan, S. (2015): Service Innovation – A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective, in: MIS Quartely, Vol. 39, No. 1, S. 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manetti, G. (2011): The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting – Empirical evidence and critical points, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, S. 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M.N. (1996): The key informant technique, in: Family Practice, Vol. 13, No. 1, S. 92-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslowska, E./Malthouse, E.C./Collinger, T. (2016): The Customer Engagement Ecosystem, in: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 32, No. 5/6, S. 469-501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.C./Davis, J.H./Schoorman, F.D. (1995): An integrative model of organizational trust, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, S. 209-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C./Zaltman, G./Deshpande, R. (1992): Relationships between providers and users of market research – The dynamics of trust within and between organizations, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, S. 314-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R.M./Hunt, S.D. (1994): The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 3, S. 20-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R./Ramírez, R. (1993): From value chain to value constellation – designing interactive strategy, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, S. 65-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, L./Fairbrass, J. (2014): Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement – A New Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 125, No. 1, S. 121-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R.W./Houston, M.B./Dant, R.P./Grewal, D. (2013): Relationship Velocity – Toward a Theory of Relationship Dynamics, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 77, No. 1, S. 13-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E.R. (2006): Making Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Operable – How Companies Translate Stakeholder Dialogue into Practice, in: Business and Society Review, Vol. 111, No. 2, S. 137-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V./Gouillart, F. (2010): The Power of Co-Creation – Build It with Them to Boost Growth, Productivity, and Profits, New York u. a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V./Ozcan, K. (2014): The co-creation paradigm, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D./Hughes, M./Kertbo, K. (2013): Exploring Consumers’ Motivations to Engage in Innovation Through Co-Creation Activities, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48, No. 1/2, S. 147-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.M./Sitkin, S.B./Burt, R.S./Camerer, C. (1998): Not so different after all – A cross-discipline view of trust, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, S. 393-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J./Grimshaw, D. (2003): The Organisation of Employment – An International Perspective, in: Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, S. 93-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo-Spena, T./Mele, C. (2012): “Five Co-s” in innovating: a practice-based view, in: Journal of Service Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, S.527-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W.B./Salanova, M./Gonzalez-Roma, V.A./ Bakker, A.B. (2002): The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout – a Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach, in: Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, S. 71-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, L.K./Miao, C.F./Palmatier, R.W. (2014): Dependence and interdependence in marketing relationships – meta-analytic insights, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43, No. 6, S. 694-712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2013): Institutions and organizations – Ideas, interests, and identities, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007): Persuasion with case studies, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, S. 20-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.M./Fischbacher, M. (2005): New service development – a stakeholder perspective, in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, No. 9/10, S. 1025-1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbacka, K./Brodie, R. J./Böhmann, T./Maglio, P.P./Nenonen, S. (2016): Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 8, S. 3008-3017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanborn, P. (2010): What is a case study? Case Study Research – What, Why and How?, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symon, G./Cassell, C. (1999): Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research – A practical guide, 2. Aufl., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syson, F./Perks, H. (2004): New service development – a network perspective, in: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 4, S. 255-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M.V./Rosenthal, S.R. (2000): Successful execution of product development projects – Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process, in: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, S. 401-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P.T./Pascarella, E.T. (1991): Twenty years of research on college students – Lessons for future research, in: Research in Higher Education, Vol. 32, No. 1, S. 83-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P.H./Ocasio, W./Lounsbury, M. (2012): Introduction to the Institutional Logics Perspective, in: Thornton, P.H./Ocasio, W./Lounsbury, M. (Hrsg.): The Institutional Logics Perspective – A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process, Oxford, S. 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997): Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks – The Paradox of Embeddedness, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1, S. 35-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L./Lusch, R.F. (2015): Institutions and Axioms – An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 44, No. 1 S. 5-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L./Lusch, R.F. (2016): Service-dominant logic 2025, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 34, No. 1, S. 46-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S.D./Beatty, S.E./Morgan, R.M. (2012): Customer Engagement – Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase, in: Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 20, No. 2, S. 122-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S.D./Dalela, V./Beatty, S.E. (2016): Partner Engagement – A perspective on B2B engagement, in: Brodie, R.J./Hollebeek, L.D./Conduit, J (Hrsg.): Customer Engagement – Contemporary issues and challenges, New York, S. 52-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2001): Corporate citizenship enacted as operating practice, in: International Journal of Value-Based Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, S. 237-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nürnberg, Deutschland

    Julian Boha, Julia M. Jonas & Kathrin M. Möslein

Authors
  1. Julian Boha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia M. Jonas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathrin M. Möslein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Boha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Marketing und Unternehmensführung Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Manfred Bruhn

  2. Lehrstuhl für Dienstleistungsmanagement Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Karsten Hadwich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boha, J., Jonas, J.M., Möslein, K.M. (2019). Engagement – Voraussetzung für kollaboratives Innovieren. In: Bruhn, M., Hadwich, K. (eds) Kooperative Dienstleistungen. Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26389-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26389-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26388-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26389-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation