Digitisation: A New Form of Precarity or New Opportunities?

  • Irina Viktorovna Novikova
Part of the Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien book series (PSETS)


Digitalization is a tendency of the present day and the future. Any manifestation of digitalization or its consequences contains both opportunities and threats. Appropriate studies of the phenomenon, modernization of the education, training and reskilling system, development of information and communication technologies (ICT) and adaptation of the regulatory framework can enable the realization of digitalization’s positive potential.


Digitalisation New industrialism Development Employment Precarity 


  1. Adams, Z., & Deakin, S. (2014). Re-regulating zero-hours contracts. Liverpool: Institute of Employment Rights.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, T. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? (p. 400). London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1533–1597.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, T., & Frey, C. (2016a). Industrial renewal in the 21st Century. Evidence from US Cities. Regional Studies, 51(3), 404–413.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, T., & Frey, C. (2016b). Structural transformation in the OECD: Digitalisation, deindustrialisation and the future of work. OECD social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 193, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Bernhardt, A. (2014). Labor standards and the reorganization of work: Gaps in data and research. IRLE Working Paper, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. Blinder, A. S. (2006). Offshoring: The next industrial revolution? Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobkov, V. N., Veredyuk, O. V., Kolosova, R. P., & Razumova, T. O. (2014). Employment and social precarization in Russia: an introduction to the analysis (Monograph). Moscow: TEIS.Google Scholar
  10. Cahuc, P., & Kramarz, F. (2005). De la précarité à mobilité, vers une sécurité sociale professionnelle: rapport au ministre de l’économie, des finances et de l’industrie et au ministre de l’emploi, du travail et de la cohésion sociale. Paris: La Documentation française.Google Scholar
  11. Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016). The future of work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market efficiency and equitable opportunities or unfair precarisation?, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report.Google Scholar
  12. Eurofound. (2015). New forms of employment, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Irene Mandl, with Maurizio Curtarelli, Sara Riso, Oscar Vargas and Elias Gerogiannis.Google Scholar
  13. Eurofound/International Labour Office. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and the International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
  14. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The Future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation.
  15. Gash, V. (2008). Bridge or trap? Temporary workers’ Transitions to unemployment and to the standard employment contract. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, L., & Mamic, I. (2015). The future of work: Increasing reach through mobile technology. ILO DWT for East and South-East Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: ILO, 47.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, J., & Krueger, A. (2015). An analysis of the labor market for uber’s driver-partners in the United States”. Working Papers, Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section, No 587.
  18. International Labour Office. (1997). Part-time work: Solution or trap? International Labour Review, 136(4), 557–579.Google Scholar
  19. Korunka, C., & Kubicek, B. (2017). Job demands in a changing world of work: Impact on workers’ health and performance and implication for research and practice. Vienna: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  20. Kuttner, R. (2013). The task rabbit economy. The American prospect, 2013(Sep–Oct), 46–55.Google Scholar
  21. Kuttner, R. (2016). The new inequality debate. American Prospect, 2016.Google Scholar
  22. McKinsey Global Institute. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy (Vol. 180). San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  23. McKinsey Global Institute. (2015). A labor market that works: Connecting talent with opportunity in the digital age. Washington: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  24. Novikova, I. V. (2016a). Informational person is the basis of future labor resources. Collection of abstracts of speeches of the Intern. scientific conf. “Lomonosov Readings 2016”. “Economics and the development of university scientific schools” (on the 75th anniversary of the economics department of Lomonosov Moscow State University). Moscow: The economics department of Lomonosov Moscow State University, pp. 58–59 (Hoвикoвa И.B. (2016). Инфopмaциoнный чeлoвeк»- ocнoвa бyдyщиx тpyдoвыx pecypcoв. Cбopник тeзиcoв выcтyплeний мeждyнap. нayч. кoнф. «Лoмoнocoвcкиe чтeния-2016». «Экoнoмичecкaя нayкa и paзвитиe yнивepcитeтcкиx нayчныx шкoл» (к 75-лeтию экoнoмичecкoгo фaкyльтeтa MГУ имeни M. B. Лoмoнocoвa): Mocквa: Экoнoмичecкий фaкyльтeт MГУ имeни M. B. Лoмoнocoвa, C. 58–59).Google Scholar
  25. Novikova, I. V. (2016b). Flexible employment as a form of realization of the ability to work “information man”. Bulletin of the Samara State University of Economics, 136(2), 70–76 (Hoвикoвa И.B. (2016). Гибкaя зaнятocть кaк фopмa peaлизaции cпocoбнocти к тpyдy «инфopмaциoннoгo чeлoвeкa». Becтник Caмapcкoгo гocyдapcтвeннoгo экoнoмичecкoгo yнивepcитeтa, 136(2), 70–76).Google Scholar
  26. Novikova, I. V. (2017). Regulation of employment in the far East of the Russian federation (p. 360). Moscow: RUSAINS. (Hoвикoвa И.B. (2017). Peгyлиpoвaниe зaнятocти нa Дaльнeм Bocтoкe Poccийcкoй Фeдepaции (C. 360). Mocквa: PУCAЙHC).Google Scholar
  27. Nubelo. (2014). Primer informe regional sobre la industria del trabajo 3.0.Google Scholar
  28. Nunez, I., & Livanos, I. (2014). Temps “by choice”? An investigation of the reasons behind temporary employment among young workers in Europe. Journal of Labor Research, 36(1), 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD. (2014). Employment outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD. (2015a). OECD digital economy outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2015b). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD. (2015c). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2016a). ICTS and Jobs: Complements or Substitutes? The Effects of ICT Investment on Labour Demand by Skill and by Industry in Selected OECD countries, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2016b). New market and new jobs. Ministerial meeting on the digital economy background report. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 255. Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy, 21–23 June 2016, Cancún (Mexico).Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2016c). Skills for a digital world: 2016 Ministerial meeting on the digital economy background report. OECD digital economy papers, No. 250. Paris. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (2016d). Skills for a digital world: Policy brief on the future of work. Paris. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (2017). OECD Employment Outlook 2017. p. 220,
  38. Panel 4.2. (2016). “Skills for a Digital World” of the OECD Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy, 21–23 June 2016, Cancún (Mexico).Google Scholar
  39. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  40. Savelyev, E. A. (2017). Labor engineering: Designing labor processes and systems (pp. 59–60). Moscow: University textbook: INFRA-M. (Caвeльeвa E.A. (2017). Инжиниpинг тpyдa: пpoeктиpoвaниe тpyдoвыx пpoцeccoв и cиcтeм (C. 59–60). Mocквa: Byзoвcкий yчeбник: ИHФPA-M).Google Scholar
  41. Spiezia, V., & Vivarelli, M. (2002). What do we know about the effects of information and communication technologies on employment levels? In N. Greenan, Y. L’Horty, & J. Mairesse (Eds.), Productivity, inequality, and the digital economy – A transatlantic perspective. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  43. Summers, L., & Balls, E. (2015). Report of the commission on inclusive prosperity. Washington: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
  44. Thierer, A., Koopman, C., Hobson, A., & Kuiper, C. (2015). How the internet, the sharing economy, and reputational feedback mechanisms solve the “Lemons Problem”. Mercatus Working Paper.Google Scholar
  45. Upwork. (2015). Upwork payroll agreement: Upwork website.Google Scholar
  46. van Est, R., & Kool, L. (Eds.). (2015). Working on the robot society: visions and insights from science concerning the relationship between technology and employment. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut.Google Scholar
  47. Van Lancker, W. (2012). The European world of temporary employment: Gendered and poor? European Societies, 14(1), 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Welsum, D., & Reif X. (2005). Potential offshoring: Evidence from selected OECD countries. Brookings Trade Forum, 2015, 165–194.Google Scholar
  49. World Economic Forum. (2016). Employment, skills and human capital global challenge insight report «The Future of Jobs Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution».Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina Viktorovna Novikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Financial Strategy of the Moscow School of EconomicsLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations