Advertisement

Bringing Precarity to the Political Agenda

  • Vadim KvachevEmail author
Chapter
  • 138 Downloads
Part of the Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien book series (PSETS)

Abstract

Precarity usually is considered to be an economics outcome of the major political changes. In this text the author presents other point of view: precarity is itself a political problem. The current precarious situation is a result of shifts in ideology towards unsustainable autonomous concept of human operating in the neoliberal paradigm. At the system level precarity is the inevitable consequence of the development of global capitalism with its deep integration of inequality and insecurity into the very social fabric of all societies. The spread of precarity is associated with the destruction of the social state and social partnership model. The author argues that precarity is in fact political problem that requires political instruments to be solved.

Keywords

Precarity Social policy Economic development Political economy Social partnership 

References

  1. Bizyukov, P. (2013). Precarious employment as a from of labour relation degradation. Vestnik Obschestvennogo mneniya, 1(114), 100–109. (Бизюкoв П.B. Heycтoйчивaя зaнятocть кaк фopмa дeгpaдaции тpyдoвыx oтнoшeний).Google Scholar
  2. Bobkov, V., & Kvachev, V. (2017). Precarity: Local disorders or new global order? Sociologicheskoye Obozrenie, 16(4), 72–86.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, F. (2017). From enslavement to precarity? The labour question in African history. In W. Adebanwi (Ed.), The political economy of everyday life in Africa: Beyond the margins (pp. 135–156). Rochester: Boydell & Brewer Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Crouch, C. (2014). Class Relations and Labour-Market Reform. In M. Keune & A. Serrano (Eds.), Deconstructing flexicurity and developing alternative approaches: Towards new concepts and approaches for employment and social policy (pp. 27–46). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Fleming, P. (2017). The death of homo economicus: Work, debt and myth of endless accumulation. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (2003). Lectures at the college de France. 1975–76 (Trans. D. Macey). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  9. From Precarious Work to Decent Work. (2013). Outcome document to the worker’s symposium on policies and regulations to combat precarious employment. ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@actrav/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_179787.pdf. Accessed 25. Oct. 2018.
  10. Fumagalli, A. (2013). Cognitive biocapitalism, the precarity trap, and basic income: Post-crisis perspectives. post-crisis perspectives: The common and its powers. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jordan, B. (2015). Authoritarianism and the precariat/precariat: Labour, work and politics (pp. 4–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Jorgensen, M. B. (2017). The precariat strikes back – precarity struggles in practice. In M. B. Jorgensen (Ed.), Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences (pp. 52–77). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalleberg, A. L. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs. The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States., 2970s to 2000s. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Key Indicators of the Labour Market. Ninth Edition. (2016). Geneva: International labour office. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—stat/documents/publication/wcms_498929.pdf. Accessed 25. Oct. 2018.
  16. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Lukach, G. (1967). Reification and consciousness of the proletariat. Talgarth: Merlin.Google Scholar
  18. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2005). From precarity to precariousness and back again: Labour, life and unstable networks. Fibreculture, 5, 10–13.Google Scholar
  20. Ranciere, J. (2007). On the shores of politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Scholl, C. (2013). Europe as contagious space. Cross-border diffusion through EuroMayDay and climate justice movements. In C. Flesher Fominaya & L. Cox (Eds.), Understanding European movements: New social movements, global justice struggles, anti-austerity protest (pp. 127–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Sieg, A. (2017). From unemployment to strongly precarioius work and living conditions: Over 15 years Hartz-Laws (Practice in Germany). In V. N. Bobkov (Ed.), Precarity of employment: Global and Russian contexts of the future of work (pp. 70–80). Moscow: RealPrint.Google Scholar
  23. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Standing, G. (2015). The precariat and class struggle. RCCS Annual Review, 2015(7), 3–16.Google Scholar
  25. Subetto, A. I. (2011). Noosphere Socialism Manifesto. St. Petersburg: Asterion and N A. Nekrasov Kostroma State University Publ. (Cyбeттo A.И. Maнифecт нoocфepнoгo coциaлизмa).Google Scholar
  26. Toshenko, J. T., & 6. (2015). Precariat – new social class. Sociologicheskie issledovanya, 2015(3), 3–13. (Toщeнкo Ж.T. Пpeкapиaт – нoвый coциaльный клacc).Google Scholar
  27. Veredyuk, O. V. (2016). Neformal’naya zanyatost’: Struktura i factory riska v Rossii. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, 4(5), 33–48. (Bepeдюк O.B. Heфopмaльнaя зaнятocть: cтpyктypa и фaктopы pиcкa в Poccии).Google Scholar
  28. Vosko, L. F. (2006). Precarious employment: Towards an improved understanding of labour market insecurity. Precarious employment: Understanding of labour market insecurity in Canada. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-system analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zizek, S. (2009). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian University of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations