• Peter HerrmannEmail author
  • Vyacheslav Bobkov
Part of the Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien book series (PSETS)


Currently it is fashionable to talk about digitisation, robotisation, industry 4.0, but also about the gig economy, the Millenials, precarisation and the like. However, too often the relevant issues are taken in isolation, very much caught in traditional terms. The present collection aims on providing some thoughts that allow going further, on the one hand by qualifying some of the aspects, and on the other hand by taking a view that approaches the topic from distinct perspectives in order to arrive at an assessment of emerging societal changes.


Social phenomena Development Socio-economics Precarisation Change 


  1. Adams, A. et al. (2015). The “Zero-Hours-Contract”: Regulating casual work, or legitimating precarity? Oxford: University of Oxford. Legal Research Paper Series, 00/2015. Accessed 21 July 2018.
  2. Antunes, R. (2018). The new service proletariat. Monthly Review. Accessed 15 June 2018.
  3. Antunes, R., & Braga, R. (2009). InfoproletárIos. Degradação real do trabalho virtual. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  4. Araujo Guimarães, N. (2007). «La «brésilianisation» de l’occident?». Revue Tiers Monde 2007(1):155–174, n 189.; Accessed 17 July 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boccara, F. (2016). Révolution informationnelle, «numérique», valeur et analyse marxiste de la marchandise Quelques réflexions provisoires. Economie et politique/mai-juin, 2016:742–743Google Scholar
  6. Boccara, P. (2008). «Les ambivalences de la révolution informationnelle. Antagonismes et potentialités». La Pensée, n° 353, janvier-février.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (trans: Richard Nice). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Les structures sociales de l’Économie; Éditions du SeuilGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, C. (1940). Conditions of economic progress. Bombay: Macmillan&Co.Google Scholar
  10. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm; Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 16 (Nov., 1937), pp. 386–405; Published by: Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines; Stable URL. Accessed 11 July 2017.
  11. Fisher, A. G. B. (1939). Production, primary, secondary and tertiary. Economic Record, 15(1): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flaherty, J. (November 2017). Why the ‘end of the startup era’ could be great for entrepreneurs. Accessed 17 July 2018.
  13. Fourastié, J. (1949). Le Grand Espoir du XXe siècle. Progrès technique, progrès économique, progrès social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Francis. (2013). Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium of The Holy Father Francis to the Bishops, Clergy, Consecrated Persons and the Lay Faithful on the Proclamation of The Gospel in Today’s World (Vol. 46). Vatican: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Accessed 15 July 2018.
  15. Freeland, C. (2012). Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. New York: The Penguin Press (epub-edition).Google Scholar
  16. Gallinge, I. (2004). Im Zeitalter der Insolvenzen? Z. Zeitschrift Marxistische Erneuerung, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. German Federation of Trade Unions (DGB)/Hans Böckler Foundation (HBS). (May 2018). Atlas of Work (p. 40 f.). Paderborn: Bonifatius. Accessed 18 July 2018.
  18. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (pp. 275–276) (ed. and trans: Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  19. Herrmann, P. (2018). Social networks and network effect. In Commedia Della Vita Or Pánta Rêi’s Firm Ground. Peter Herrmannʼs blog, trying to inspire thinking.
  20. Hilferding, R. (1910). Finance capital. A study of the latest phase of capitalist development (edited and with an introduction by Tom Bottomore; trans: Morris Watnick and Sam Gordon). London: Routledge & Keagan (Paul 1981).Google Scholar
  21. Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Joyce, S. (December 2016). CrowdWork in Europe. Preliminary results from a survey in the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria and the Netherlands; first draft report to FEPS/UNI-Europa from Hertfordshire Business School. Accessed 22 Jan 2017.
  22. ILO. (2012). From precarious work to decent work: outcome document to the workers’ symposium on policies and regulations to combat precarious employment; International Labour Office, Bureau for Workers’ Activities; Geneva: ILO, 2012.—ed_dialogue/—actrav/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_179787.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  23. ILO. (without date). Current Guidelines. The 14th ICLS adopted the Resolution concerning the International Classification of Status in Employment (ICSE), known as ICSE-93.–en/index.htm. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  24. Kümmel, A. (26.10.2017). “Das Kapital sind wir”: Big Data für alle; in: ZeitOnline. Accessed 29 Mar 18.
  25. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Lenin, V. I. (1917). Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. A popular outline. In Lenin’s selected works. Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1963, Moscow: 667–766Google Scholar
  27. Lipietz, A. (1986). New tendencies in the international division of labor: Regimes of accumulation and modes of regulation. In A. J.Scott & M. Storper (Eds.), Production, work, territory: The geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism (p. 16–40). Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  28. Luxemburg, R. (1913). The accumulation of capital (trans: Agnes Schwarzschild, with an introduction by Joan Robinson) London: Routledge & Keagan Paul (1971).Google Scholar
  29. Marx, K. (1887). Capital, Volume I (German first edition 1867). In K. Marx & F. Engels (eds.), Collected Works (Vol. 35). London: Lawrence & Wishart (1996).Google Scholar
  30. Nachtwey, O., & Seidl, T. (2017). Die Ethik der Solution und der Geist des Digitalen Kapitalismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Institut für Sozialforschung. Accessed 30 Des 2017.
  31. Scheetz, M. (24 Aug 2017). Technology killing off corporate America: Average life span of companies under 20 years. Accessed 17 July 2018.
  32. Thatcher, Margaret, interviewed by Douglas Keay. (1987, September 23). Interview for Womanʼs Own; Thatcher Archive (THCR 5/2/262): COI transcript. Accessed 17 July 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univesity of Ersten FinlandKuopioFinland
  2. 2.Russian University of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations