Abstract
Based on the crystallisation line Tx(p) of eHDA0.2 and eHDA0.3 in Fig. 26 (a), as well as the analysis of the resulting crystallisation products in Fig. 27 (b), no significant difference between the nature of eHDA0.2 and eHDA0.3 is assumed, neither in the thermal stability against crystallisation nor in the crystallisation mode, as both starting materials yield similar crystallisation products. The presence of one main crystalline phase (and only marginal amounts of another phase) after crystallisation indicates that both, eHDA0.2 and eHDA0.3, can be regarded glassy, in other words the low-temperature proxy of HDL [101, 149, 152]. By contrast, the crystallisation line Tx(p) of eHDA0.1 exhibits quite different behaviour (see Fig. 26 (a)).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tonauer, C. (2019). Discussion [167]. In: Glassy Nuclei in Amorphous Ice. BestMasters. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26324-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26324-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26323-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26324-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)