Abstract
This chapter proposes the extension of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) model as more reliable and efficient way of managing risks. The control mechanisms that quantify and analyse the consequences of risk materialization and its probability of appearance are usually considered by managers using subjective data. How can we measure if the probability of appearance of one risk is high or medium? The objective of this paper is finding new ways of introducing FMEA’s detection as a third parameter in the risk assessment matrix and establishing weather the evaluation is more efficient or not. The methodology includes interviews with managers and specialists that handle risk management processes in their organizations and that share an opinion on extending the risk matrix and improving the whole risk assessment process in order to cut risk handling costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ArunKumar, G., Dillibabu, R. (2016). Design and Application of New Quality Improvement Model: Kano Lean Six Sigma for Software Maintenance Project. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41(3), 997–1014.
Carbone, T. A., Tippett, D.D. (2015). Project Risk Management Using the Project Risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2004.11415263.
Chang, K., Chang, Y., Lai, P. (2014). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(6), 1413–1427.
Dinmohammadi, F., Alkali, B., Shafiee, M., Bérenguer, C., Labib, A. (2016). Risk Evaluation of Railway Rolling Stock Failures Using FMECA Technique: A Case Study of Passenger Door System. Urban Rail Transit, 2(3), 128–145.
Grigore, A.M., Drăgan, I.M. (2015). Entrepreneurship and its Economical Value in a very Dynamic Business Environment. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38), 120-132.
Jereb, B., Ivanuša, T., Rosi, B. (2013). Systemic Thinking and Requisite Holism in Mastering Logistics Risks: The Model for Identifying Risks in Organisations and Supply Chain. Amfiteatru economic, 15(33), 56-73.
Maier, D., Sven-Joachim, I., Fortmüller, A., Maier, A. (2017). Development and Operationalization of a Model of Innovation Management System as Part of an Integrated Quality-Environment-Safety System. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(44), 302-314.
Mateescu (Bejinariu), R., Olaru, M., Lange, S., Rauch, M. (2015). Study on Supplier Invoice Risk Management in a Global Supply Chain. In: Soliman K. S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th IBIMA conference on Innovation Management and Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to Global Growth, Madrid, Spain, 11-12 November 2015.
Mateescu (Bejinariu), R., Buchmüller, M., Just V. (2016). Research on Key Factors Impacting Process Sustainability in Global Companies. In: Proceeding of the International Conference BASIQ 2016 “New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption”, Konstanz, Germany, 2-3 June 2016.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2011). NASA Risk Management Handbook, Washington DC.
Schneider, H. (2012). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution, Journal Technometrics, 80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424.
United States Department of Defense (1949). MIL-P-1629 - Procedures for performing a failure mode effect and critical analysis. Department of Defense (US). https://src.alionscience.com/pdf/MIL-STD-1629RevA.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2017.
Youssef, N. F., Hyman, W. A. (2010). Risk Analysis: Beyond Probability and Severity, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, 32(8). [e-journal] http://www.mddionline.com/article/risk-analysis-beyond-probability-andseverity. Accessed 3 Dec. 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mateescu, R.M., Dinu, V., Maftei, M. (2019). Risk Management Methods: FMEA and its Influence on Risk Handling Costs. In: Tăchiciu, L., Weber, G., Bodemann, M. (eds) Building Engagement for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Management, Wertschöpfung und Effizienz. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26172-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26172-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26171-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26172-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)