Advertisement

Internationale Gestaltung der Belohnungssysteme

  • Ruth Stock-Homburg
  • Matthias Groß
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Lernziele dieses Kapitels: Die Leser kennen die zentralen Anforderungen an international eingesetzte Beurteilende. Die Leser überblicken die zentralen Zielgruppen internationaler Beurteilungen. Die Leser verstehen die zentralen Bezugsgrößen internationaler Beurteilungen. Die Leser kennen die Besonderheiten der Durchführung internationaler Beurteilungen. Die Leser sind in der Lage, alternative Strategien zur internationalen Gestaltung von Vergütungssystemen zu diskutieren.

Literatur

  1. Aon Hewitt GmbH, & ESCP Europe Business School Berlin. (2015). Pressemitteilung. Multinationale Unternehmen: Vergütung zentralisieren oder dezentralisieren? http://www.aon.com/germany/downloads/aonhewitt/pm20150910_multinationale_unternehmen_verguetung_zentralisieren_oder_dezentralisieren.pdf. Zugegriffen am 12.01.2018.
  2. Atwater, L., Waldman, D., & Brett, J. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briscoe, D., Schuler, R., & Tarique, I. (2011). International human resource management: Policy and practice for multinational enterprises (4. Aufl.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cascio, W., & Bailey, E. (1995). International human resource management: The state of research and practice. In O. Shenkar (Hrsg.), Global perspectives of human resource management (S. 15–36). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Dowling, P., Festing, M., & Engle, A. (2008). International human resource management: Managing people in a multinational context (5. Aufl.). London: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  6. Dülfer, E., & Jöstingmeier, B. (2008). Internationales Management in unterschiedlichen Kulturbereichen (7. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 641–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GLOBE Foundation. (2006). Research survey, GLOBE project, Form Beta. http://www.thunderbird.edu/wwwfiles/sites/globe/pdf/GLOBE_Phase_2_Beta_Questionnaire.pdf. Zugegriffen am 02.03.2010.
  9. Gómez-Mejía, L., & Welbourne, T. (1991). Compensation strategies in a global context. Human Resource Planning, 14(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  10. Gould, C. (1999). Expat pay plans suffer cutbacks. Workforce, 78(9), 40–45.Google Scholar
  11. Gregersen, H., Hite, J., & Black, J. (1996). Expatriate performance appraisal in U.S. multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 711–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groeschl, S. (2003). Cultural implications for the appraisal process. Cross Cultural Management, 10(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, E. (1977). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, M. (1993). Empirical evidence of recurring international compensation problems. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodgetts, R., & Luthans, F. (1993). U.S. multinationals’ compensation strategies for local management: Cross-cultural implications. Compensation & Benefits Review, 25(2), 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. (2011). Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales Management (5. Aufl.). München: Deutscher Taschenbuch.Google Scholar
  18. Homburg, C., & Stock-Homburg, R. (2012). Der kundenorientierte Mitarbeiter: Bewerten, begeistern, bewegen (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. House, J. (1996). Zum Erwerb interkultureller Kompetenz im Unterricht des Deutschen als Fremdsprache. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachunterricht, 1(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  20. Janssens, M. (1994). Evaluating international managers’ performance: Parent company standards as control mechanism. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(4), 853–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jesuino, J. (2002). Latin Europe cluster: From South to North. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovach, R. (1994). Matching assumptions to environment in the transfer of management practices. International Studies of Management & Organization, 24(4), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kutschker, M., & Schmid, S. (2011). Internationales Management (7. Aufl.). München: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowe, K., Milliman, J., De Cieri, H., & Dowling, P. (2002). International compensation practices: A ten country comparative analysis. Human Resource Management, 41(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luthans, K., & Farner, S. (2002). Expatriate development: The use of 360-degree feedback. Journal of Management Development, 21(10), 780–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manny, B., McMullen, T., Sperling, R., & Scott, D. (2006). The future of compensation professionals according to your colleagues. Workspan, 49(1), 29–31.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, D., & Bartol, K. (2003). Factors influencing expatriate performance appraisal system success: An organizational perspective. Journal of International Management, 9(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mikosch, B. (2004). Deutsche Regeltreue und chinesische Flexibilität. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 176, 49.Google Scholar
  29. Milliman, J., Nason, S., Gallagher, E., Huo, P., Von Glinow, M., & Lowe, K. (1998). The impact of national culture on human resource management practices: The case of performance appraisals. Advances in International Comparative Management, 12, 157–183.Google Scholar
  30. Milliman, J., Taylor, S., & Czaplewski, A. (2002). Cross-cultural performance feedback in multinational enterprises: Opportunity for organizational learning. Human Resource Planning, 25(3), 29–43.Google Scholar
  31. Nathan, B., Mohrman, A., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 352–369.Google Scholar
  32. Newman, K., & Nollen, D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 753–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oddou, G., & Mendenhall, M. (2012). Expatriate performance appraisal: Problems and solutions. In G. Stahl, M. Mendenhall & G. Oddou (Hrsg.), Readings and cases in international human resource management (S. 236–245). Cincinnati: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Ott, M. (2010). Alles verstanden – Nichts begriffen? – ‚Global Players‘ zwischen Kultur und Konflikt. In K. Götz (Hrsg.), Interkulturelles Lernen/Interkulturelles Training, Managementkonzepte Band 8 (7. Aufl., S. 227–246). München: Hampp.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, R., Sargent, J., Napier, N., & Shim, W. (1996). Corporate expatriate HRM policies, internationalization, and performance in the world’s largest MNCs. Management International Review, 36(3), 215–230.Google Scholar
  36. Phillips, L., & Fox, M. (2003). Compensation strategy in transnational corporations. Management Decision, 41(5), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramamoorthy, N., & Carroll, S. (1998). Individualism/collectivism orientations and reactions toward alternative human resource management practices. Human Relations, 51(5), 571–588.Google Scholar
  38. Rentzsch, H.-P. (1999). Erfolgreich verhandeln im weltweiten Business, Verhalten, Taktik und Strategie für internationale Meetings und Präsentationen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds, C. (1986). Compensation of overseas personnel. In J. Famularo (Hrsg.), Handbook of human resources administration (S. 56.1–56.22). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Reynolds, C. (2001). Compensating globally mobile employees – Approaches to developing expatriate pay strategies for the evolving international corporation (2. Aufl.). Scottsdale: WorldatWork.Google Scholar
  41. Ringwald, N. (2009). Mitarbeiterführung im internationalen Kontext: Stand der Forschung und Klassifikation von Expatriate-Führungskräften. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  42. Rothlauf, J. (2012). Interkulturelles Management (4. Aufl.). München: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schell, M., & Solomon, C. (1997). Capitalizing on a global workforce: A strategic guide to expatriate management. New York: Irwin.Google Scholar
  44. Schneider, S., & Barsoux, J. (2003). Managing across cultures (2. Aufl.). Harlow: Financial Times.Google Scholar
  45. Schneider, U., & Hirt, C. (2007). Multikulturelles Management. München: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schugh, M. (2004). Interkulturelle Kommunikation: Kulturbedingte Unterschiede in Verkauf und Werbung. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  47. Schuler, R., & Rogovsky, N. (1998). Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shih, H., Chiang, Y., & Kim, I. (2005). Expatriate performance management from MNEs of different national origins. International Journal of Manpower, 26(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sims, R., & Schraeder, M. (2005). Expatriate compensation: An explanatory review of salient contextual factors and common practices. Career Development International, 10(2), 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snape, E., Thompson, D., Yan, F., & Redman, T. (1998). Performance appraisal and culture: Practice and attitudes in Hong Kong and Great Britain. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(5), 841–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sparrow, P., & Wu, P. (1997). Does national culture really matter? Predicting HRM preferences of Taiwanese employees. Employee Relations, 20(1), 26–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suutari, V., & Tornikoski, C. (2001). The challenge of expatriate compensation: The sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction among expatriates. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(3), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tahvanainen, M. (2000). Expatriate performance management: The case of Nokia telecommunications. Human Resource Management, 39(2/3), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson, M., & Richter, A. (1998). Using culture principles to resolve the paradox in international remuneration. ACA Journal, 7(2), 28–37.Google Scholar
  55. Toh, M., & DeNisi, A. (2003). Host country national reactions to expatriate pay policies: A model and implications. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 606–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vance, C., McClaine, R., Boje, D., & Stage, H. (1992). An examination of the transferability of traditional performance appraisal principles across cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 32(4), 313–326.Google Scholar
  57. Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Srinivas, E. (2005). The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: Evidence from two samples – The US and India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(11), 2029–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Stock-Homburg
    • 1
  • Matthias Groß
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachgebiet für Marketing und PersonalmanagementTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtDeutschland
  2. 2.FB WirtschaftRheinische Fachhochschule KölnKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations