Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Mediensoziologie pp 287–308Cite as

Massenmediale Öffentlichkeit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 5071 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die alten Massenmedien Buch, Zeitung, Radio und Fernsehen vor dem Aufkommen des Internet kommunizierten in einem industriellen Produktionsmodus: zentrale Produktion durch relativ wenige Sender und Rezeption relativ einheitlicher Produkte durch viele Empfänger. Daraus ergibt sich eine Gegenüberstellung der beiden klar unterschiedenen Akteursgruppen von Produzenten und Konsumenten und der Diskurse in diesen beiden Gruppen. Das Kapitel diskutiert (1) den Einfluss der Massenmedien auf Diskurse in der Gesellschaft die unterschiedlichen Sichtweisen von Kritischer Theorie und Cultural Studies auf die Rolle der Rezipienten sowie die Fähigkeit der Medien, die Tagesordnung öffentlich diskutierter Probleme zu bestimmen (Agenda-Setting), und andererseits (2) die Diskurse innerhalb der Massenmedien anhand empirischer Beispiele der inneren Organisation von Medien, insbesondere die intensiven qualitativen Studien zu Inhaltsauswahl und Selbstverständnis in Medienorganisationen seit den 1970er Jahren, einen gesellschaftsvergleichenden Überblick über Mediensysteme um die Jahrtausendwende, und die aktuellen Fragen der „Krise des Journalismus“ seither.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zur Präzisierung wird oft der Zusatz „demokratisch“-korporatistisch verwendet, weil der ursprüngliche Korporatismus ein antidemokratisches Modell der Zwischenkriegszeit war. Da es aber nur wenige Jahre existierte und heutzutage keine Option mehr darstellt, meint der Begriff Korporatismus auf Gegenwartsgesellschaften bezogen auch ohne den Zusatz immer diesen demokratischen Korporatismus.

Literatur

Zentrale Referenzen

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gśta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, John. 1993. Power plays, power works. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, John. 2011. Television culture. London: Routledge. (Erstveröffentlichung 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., und David Soskice. 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1980. Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972–79. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., und Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., und S. Papathanassopoulos. 2002. Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media Culture & Society 24:175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max, und Theodor W. Adorno. 2013. Dialektik der Aufklärung: philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer. (Erstveröffentlichung 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccombs, M.E., und D.L. Shaw. 1972. Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36:176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey, und Marilyn Lester. 1974. News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American Sociological Review 39:101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Gaye. 1972. Objectivity as strategic ritual – Examination of newsmens notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology 77:660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Gaye. 1978. Making news. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Beispiele mediensoziologischer Studien

  • Adena, Maja, Ruben Enikolopov, et al. 2015. Radio and the rise of the nazis in Prewar Germany. Quarterly Journal of Economics 130:1885–1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. 2015. The crisis of journalism reconsidered: Cultural power. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 8:9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, D. 2015. New journalistic network projects. The case of ‚La Marea‘. Index Comunicacion 5:53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandelli, D., und G. Porcelli. 2016. „Femicide in Italy „Femminicidio,“ Moral Panic and Progressivist Discourse.“ Sociologica-Italian Journal of Sociology on Line:1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhurst, K.G. 2015. Contradictions in news epistemology: How modernism failed mainstream US journalism. Media, Culture and Society 37:1244–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelt-Kircher, Gabriele, Hans Bohrmann, et al. 2010. Krise der Printmedien: eine Krise des Journalismus? Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. 2017. Maybe things aren’t so bad, or are they? Michael Schudson’s ambivalent critique of commercialism. Journalism Studies 18:1210–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski, P.J., und E. Mitchelstein. 2017. The gap between the media and the public. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese, E.B. 2015. The perpetual crisis of journalism: Cable and digital revolutions. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 8:49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brevini, B. 2017. WikiLeaks: Between disclosure and whistle-blowing in digital times. Sociology Compass 11:11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggemann, M., E. Humprecht, et al. 2016. Framing the newspaper crisis: How debates on the state of the press are shaped in Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Journalism Studies 17:533–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. 2016. Policing paedophilia: Assembling bodies, spaces and things. Crime Media Culture 12:345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. 2007. Order versus access: News search engines and the challenge to traditional journalistic roles. Media Culture & Society 29:1014–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, A. 2015. Behind the newspaper paywall – lessons in charging for online content: a comparative analysis of why Australian newspapers are stuck in the purgatorial space between digital and print. Media, Culture and Society 37:1022–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chyi, H.I., S.C. Lewis, und N. Zheng. 2012. A matter of life and death? Examining how newspapers covered the newspaper „crisis“. Journalism Studies 13:305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S.E., J. Heritage, et al. 2007. When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review 72:23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S.E., und A. Reisner. 1998. Gatekeeping in action: Editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthiness. American Sociological Review 63:178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. 2019. Triple crisis of journalism. Journalism 20:190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. 2016. Smells like teen spirit: Channelling subcultural traditions in contemporary Dr Martens branding. Journal of Consumer Culture 16:192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, James W., und Everett M. Rogers. 1996. Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dencik, L., und S. Allan. 2017. In/visible conflicts: NGOs and the visual politics of humanitarian photography. Media, Culture and Society 39:1178–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., J. Sloan, und M. Wykes. 2013. ‚Moatifs‘ of masculinity: The stories told about ‚men‘ in British newspaper coverage of the Raoul Moat case. Crime Media Culture 9:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enli, G., und C.A. Simonsen. 2018. ‚Social media logic‘ meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information Communication & Society 21:1081–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francombe-Webb, J., und M. Silk. 2016. Young girls’ embodied experiences of femininity and social class. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association 50:652–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H., J. Raisborough, und O. Klein. 2013. Making death ‚good‘: instructional tales for dying in newspaper accounts of Jade Goody’s death. Sociology of Health & Illness 35:419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Führer, Karl Christian. 1996. Auf dem Weg zur „Massenkultur“? Kino und Rundfunk in der Weimarer Republik. Historische Zeitschrift 262:739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Führer, Karl Christian. 1997. A medium of modernity? Broadcasting in Weimar Germany, 1923–1932. Journal of Modern History 69:722–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulda, Bernhard. 2009. Press and politics in the Weimar republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H.J. 2011. Multiperspectival news revisited: Journalism and representative democracy. Journalism 12:3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, E.F.R., und M.T. Sandoval-Martin. 2016. Interest and willingness to pay for investigative reporting: A solution for the crisis of journalism? Communication & Society-Spain 29:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonen, Y. 2018. Journalists-sources relationship in violent conflicts coverage: Shifting dynamics. Sociology Compass 12:13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guratzsch, Dankwart. 1974. Macht durch Organisation: die Grundlegung des Hugenbergschen Presseimperiums. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzbach, Heidrun. 1981. Das „System Hugenberg“. Das Organ bürgerlicher Sammlungspolitik vor dem Aufstieg der NSDAP. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, J. 2015. The Modernized Gretchen: Transformations of the ‚New Woman‘ in the late Weimar Republic. German History 33:52–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, Aristotle A. 2005. Nazi propaganda and the Second World War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. 2011. Reporting and the transformations of the journalistic field: US news media, 1890–2000. Media, Culture and Society 33:89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotz, Friedrich. 2009. Stuart hall: Encoding/Decoding und identität. In Schlüsselwerke der Cultural Studies, Hrsg. Andreas Hepp, Friedrich Krotz, und Tanja Thomas, 210–223. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, K., C. Due, und M. Augoustinos. 2015. Neoliberalism and nationalism: Representations of asylum seekers in the Australian mainstream news media. Discourse & Society 26:608–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lünenborg, Margreth. 2012. Die Krise des Journalismus? Die Zukunft der Journalistik! Ein Diskussionsbeitrag zur Reflexivität und Praxisrelevanz von Wissenschaft. Publizistik 57:445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, P. 2013. What scholars can learn from the crisis of Journalism. International Journal of Communication 7:127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marhoefer, L. 2015. „The book was a revelation, I recognized myself in it“: Lesbian sexuality, censorship, and the queer press in Weimar-era Germany. Journal of Womens History 27:62–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, Claudia, und Klaus Spachmann. 2003. „Krise der Zeitungen: Wohin steuert der Journalismus? Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Chefredakteuren und Schlussfolgerungen.“ Kommunikation & Management 2:1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccombs, Maxwell E. 2005. The agenda-setting function of the press. In The Press, Hrsg. G. Overholser und K.H. Jamieson, 121–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. 1994. Defining homosexuality – News coverage of the repeal the ban controversy. Discourse & Society 5:321–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.E. 2017. Framing ferguson: Fox news and the construction of US racism. Race & Class 58:39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murschetz, Paul C., Hrsg. 2013. State aid for newspapers: Theories, cases, actions. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, M. 2011. Newspapers and parties: How advertising revenues created an independent press. American Political Science Review 105:790–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R.G. 2013. State support for news: Why subsidies? Why now? What kinds? Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, V., und V. Pickard. 2015. The 1940s newspaper crisis and the birth of the hutchins commission. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. 2016. Are there still alternatives? Relationships between alternative media and mainstream media in a converged environment. Sociology Compass 10:756–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, I.A. 2015. Deep culture in action: resignification, synecdoche, and metanarrative in the moral panic of the Salem Witch Trials. Theory and Society 44:65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M., und James W. Dearing. 2007. Agenda-Setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In Media power in politics, Hrsg. D. Graber und G. Matthes, 121–133. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, Patrick, Achim Bonte, und Katja Leiskau. 2012. Digitization of popular print media as a source for studies on visual communication: Illustrated magazines of the weimar republic. Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung 37:172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.L. 2002. Social epistemology in broadcast news interviews. Language in Society 31:355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmann, W., und J. Koch. 2014. Creativity in strategic lock-ins: The newspaper industry and the digital revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 83:66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapals, A.K. 2018. Fake news: Australian and British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of „alternative facts“. Journalism Practice 12:976–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. 1989. The sociology of news production. Media, Culture and Society 11:263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, Daniel. 2009. Explaining crime: Berlin newspapers and the construction of the criminal in Weimar Germany. Journal of European Studies 39:336–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siles, I., und P.J. Boczkowski. 2012. Making sense of the newspaper crisis: A critical assessment of existing research and an agenda for future work. New Media & Society 14:1375–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieraj, S. 2010. Reporting conventions: Journalists, activists, and the thorny struggle for political visibility. Social Problems 57:505–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., und K. Gunby. 2016. Moving beyond the sound bite: Complicating the relationship between negative television news framing and in-depth reporting on activism. Sociological Forum 31:577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappel, J., J. Steemers, und B. Thomass. 2015. European media in crisis: Values, risks and policies. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. 2015. Classificatory struggles: Class, culture and inequality in neoliberal times. Sociological Review 63:493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uscinski, J.E. 2009. When does the public’s issue agenda affect the media’s issue agenda (and Vice-Versa)? Developing a framework for media-public influence. Social Science Quarterly 90:796–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, N. 2015. Newsroom moves and the newspaper crisis evaluated: Space, place, and cultural meaning. Media, Culture and Society 37:1005–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Burg, M., und H. Van den Bulck. 2017. Why are traditional newspaper publishers still surviving in the digital era? The impact of long-term trends on the Flemish newspaper industry’s financing, 1990–2014. Journal of Media Business Studies 14:82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A.T. 2017. Measuring the journalism crisis: Developing new approaches that help the public connect to the issue. International Journal of Communication 11:4731–4743.

    Google Scholar 

Lehrbücher

  • Rössler, Patrick. 2016. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. In Schlüsselwerke der Medienwirkungsforschung, Hrsg. Matthias Potthoff und G. Matthes, 121–133. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

Weitere Referenzen

  • Sturm, Florian. 2018. „Als die Medien die Objektivität entdeckten [Interview mit Andie Tucher].“ Neue Zürcher Zeitung 12.5.2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DCM, Universität Fribourg, Zürich, Schweiz

    Hanno Scholtz

  2. Soziologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz

    Hanno Scholtz

Authors
  1. Hanno Scholtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scholtz, H. (2020). Massenmediale Öffentlichkeit. In: Mediensoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26011-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26011-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26010-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26011-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation