Advertisement

How much does variety-induced complexity actually cost? Linking axiomatic design with cost modelling

  • Matthias MeyerEmail author
  • Ole Meßerschmidt
  • Kai G. Mertens
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Today, companies tend to offer a wide range of products, and the continuous introduction of more specific variants for individual customers is associated with complexity. This complexity is, to some degree, inevitable, and will yield additional costs that are frequently called complexity costs (Schuh, 2005). As a result, many organizations are facing the challenge of reconciling increased complexity with limiting costs, to be able to offer products at acceptable prices on the market.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abdelkafi, N. (2008). Variety-Induced Complexity in Mass Customization - Concepts and Management. Berlin, Germany: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, V., Balakrishnan, R., & Labro, E. (2018). A framework for conducting numerical experiments on cost system design. Journal of Management Accounting Research, In-Press.Google Scholar
  3. Balakrishnan, R., Hansen, S., & Labro, E. (2011). Evaluating heuristics used when designing product costing systems. Management Science, 57(3), 520-541.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1293
  4. Banker, R. D., & Johnston, H. H. (2006). Cost and profit driver research. In S. C. Christopher, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbooks of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 2, pp. 531-556): Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Brosch, M. (2015). Eine Methode zur Reduzierung der produktvarianteninduzierten Komplexität Hamburger Schriftenreihe Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik. Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik, Hamburg, Germany: TUHH.Google Scholar
  6. Buchholz, M. (2012). Theorie der Variantenvielfalt - Ein produktions- und absatzwirtschaftliches Erklärungsmodell. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Campagnolo, D., & Camuffo, A. (2009). The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00260.x
  8. Christensen, J., & Hemmer, T. (2006). Analytical Modeling of Cost in Management Accounting Research. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 2, pp. 557-571): Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988). How cost accounting distorts product costs. Management Accounting, 69(10), 20-27.Google Scholar
  10. Efatmaneshnik, M., & Ryan, M. J. (2016). General framework for measuring system complexity. Complexity, 21(S1), 533-546.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21767
  11. Fandel, G. (2005). Produktion I - Produktions- und Kostentheorie (Vol. 6). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Fixson, S. K. (2006). A roadmap for product architecture costing. In T. W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, & J. Jiao (Eds.), Product Platform and Product Family Design (Vol. 1). Springer-Verlag, USA: Springer US.Google Scholar
  13. Fixson, S. K. (2007). modularity and commonality research: Past Developments and Future Opportunities. Concurrent Engineering, 15(2), 85-111.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293x07078935
  14. Gosselin, M. (2006). A review of activity-based costing: Technique, implementation, and consequences. In S. C. Christopher, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 2, pp. 641-671): Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S., & Raja, M. V. (2014). Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis (Vol. 15). USA, NJ, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs, M. A. (2007). Product Complexity: A Definition and Impacts on Operation.s (MIS/OM/DS Faculty Publications), University of Dayton.Google Scholar
  17. Kersten, W., von See, B., & Skirde, H. (2014). Megatrens treiben Komplexität, Komplexität treibt Kosten. Logistik Heute, 12, 64-65.Google Scholar
  18. Kersten, W., von See, B., Skirde, H., & Wichmann, M. (2015). Schlussbericht zum Projekt “Bewertung von Komplexitätskosten in Logistiksystemen”. IGF-Vorhaben 17726 N der Forschungsvereining Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL).Google Scholar
  19. Keuper, F. (2004). Systemkomplexität. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 637(5), 637-641.Google Scholar
  20. Krause, D., & Gebhard, N. (2018). Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien - Hohe Produktvielfalt beherrschbar entwickeln. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Mertens, K. G. (2019). Measure and manage your products costs right – Using economic axiomatic design for evaluating product cost measurement and management. Hamburg University of Technology, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Mertens, K. G., & Meyer, M. (2018). Wie schlimm sind Messfehler für die Kostenrechnung? Controlling & Management Review, 62(9), 28-39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12176-018-0080-4
  23. Park, J., & Simpson, T. W. (2008). Toward an activity-based costing system for product families and product platforms in the early stages of development. International Journal of Production Research, 46(1), 99-130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600825240
  24. Ripperda, S., & Krause, D. (2017). Cost effects of modular product family structures: methods and quantification of impacts to support decision making. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035430]
  25. Schuh, G. (2005). Produktkomplexität managen: Strategien - Methoden - Tools (Vol. 2). München: Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1989). Strategic Cost Analysis - The Evolution from Managerial to Strategic Accounting. USA, NY, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Simon, H. A. (1962). The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6 (December)), 467-482.Google Scholar
  28. Skirde, H., Kersten, W., & Schröder, M. (2016). Measuring the Cost Effects of Modular Product Architectures - A Conceptual Approach. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(04), 1650017.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877016500176
  29. Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic Design. Advances and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Meyer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ole Meßerschmidt
    • 1
  • Kai G. Mertens
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Management Accounting and SimulationHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations