Advertisement

Grasping human perception of the future: A structured approach to mental models of time and prospect

  • Reimo JahnEmail author
  • Hans Koller
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Among the most relevant megatrends of today’s business and society are the fastmoving world, the accelerating development of technology and increasing complexity. All these environmental conditions have impact on the way humans perceive their future and how they prepare for it today. An increasingly velocious future leaves people and organizations with constantly decreasing time for preparation and a growing degree of uncertainty while the present itself becomes more and more irrelevant (Huyssen 2000).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahvenharju, S., Minkkinen, M., Lalot, F., 2018. The Five Dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Futures 104, 1-13.Google Scholar
  2. Andriopoulos, C., Gotsi, M., 2006. Probing the Future: Mobilising Foresight in Multiple-Product Innovation Firms. Futures 38(1), 50-66.Google Scholar
  3. Beal, S. J., 2011. The Development of Future Orientation: Underpinnings and Related Constructs. Retrieved from University of Nebraska, Licoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychdiss/32.
  4. Bearden, W. O., Money, R. B., Nevins, J. L., 2006. A Measure of Long-term Orientation: Development and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(3), 456-467.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S., 1985. Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor. Journal of Labor Economics 3(1, Part 2), 33-58.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, W., 1997. Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era. Vol. 1, History, Purposes and Knowledge. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Berger G., 1964. Phénoménologie du Temps et Prospective [Phenomenology of Time and Prospective], PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J., 1990. Acts of Meaning. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Cinamon, R. G., Rich, Y., 2014. Work and Family Plans among At-risk Israeli Adolescents: A Mixed-methods Study. Journal of Career Development 41(3), 163-184.Google Scholar
  10. Craik, K., 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Cuhls, K., 2003. From Forecasting to Foresight Processes—New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting 22(2‐3), 93-111.Google Scholar
  12. Daheim, C., Uerz, G., 2008. Corporate Foresight in Europe: From Trend based Logics to Open Foresight. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20(3), 321-336.Google Scholar
  13. De Jouvenel, H., 2000. A Brief Methodological Guide to Scenario Building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 65, 37–48.Google Scholar
  14. Doyle, J., Ford, D., 1998. Mental Models Concepts for System Dynamics Research. System Dynamics Review 14(1), 3-29.Google Scholar
  15. Durance, P., 2010. Reciprocal Influence in Future Thinking between Europe and the USA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77, 1469–1475.Google Scholar
  16. Ehls, D., Korreck, S., Jahn, R., Zeng, M., Heuschneider, S., Herstatt, C., Koller, H., Spaeth, S., 2016. Open foresight: exploiting information from external sources. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2764208.
  17. Eldredge, N., Gould, S., 1972. Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In: Schopf, T. (Ed.) Models in Paleobiology 82-115, Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Fischbein, E., Tirosh, D. Stavy, R., Oster, A., 1990. The Autonomy of Mental Models, For the Learning of Mathematics 10(1), 24.Google Scholar
  19. Flechtheim, O. K., 1971. Futurologie: Der Kampf um die Zukunft [Futurology: Struggle for the Future]. Wissenschaft und Politik, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
  20. Godet, M., 2006. Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool (2nd Ed.). Economica, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Godet, M., Roubelat, F., 1996. Creating the Future: The Use and Misuse of Scenarios. Long Range Planning 29(2), 164-171.Google Scholar
  22. Grimes, A., Ren, C., Stevens, P., 2012. The Need for Speed. Journal of Productivity Analysis 37(2), 187-201.Google Scholar
  23. Hammack, P. L., Pilecki, A., 2012. Narrative as a Root Metaphor for Political Psychology. Political Psychology 33(1), 75-103.Google Scholar
  24. Heger, T., Boman, M., 2015. Networked Foresight: The Case of EIT ICT Labs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 147-164.Google Scholar
  25. Heger, T., Rohrbeck, R., 2012. Strategic Foresight for Collaborative Exploration of New Business Fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(5), 819-831.Google Scholar
  26. Heidingsfelder, M., Kimpel, K., Best, K., Schraudner, M., 2015. Shaping Future. Adapting Design Know-how to Reorient Innovation towards Public Preferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 291-298.Google Scholar
  27. Heinonen, S., 2013. Neo-growth in Future Post-carbon Cities. Journal of Futures Studies 18(1), 13-40.Google Scholar
  28. Hummels, D., 2008. Global Trends in Trade and Transportation. Benefitting from Globalisation. Transport Sector Contribution and Policy Challenges. OECD/ITF, 15-36.Google Scholar
  29. Huyssen, A., 2000. Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia. Public Culture 12(1), 21-38.Google Scholar
  30. Ingvar, D. H., 1985. Memory of the Future: An Essay on the Temporal Organization of Conscious Awareness. Human Neurobiology 4(3), 127-136.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson-Laird, P., 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Kersten, W., Schröder, M., 2007. Anforderungen an die Logistiker der Zukunft [Requirements of Future Logistics]. Logistik für Unternehmen - Das Fachmagazin der internen und externen Logistik 10, 19-20.Google Scholar
  33. Kersten, W., von See, B., Skirde, H., 2014. Identification of Megatrends Affecting Complexity in Logistics Systems. Hamburg International Conference of Logistics 3-27.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, S. B., Robertson, T. E., Delton, A. W., 2011. The Future-orientation of Memory: Planning as a key Component Mediating the High Levels of Recall Found with Survival Processing. Memory 19(2), 121-139.Google Scholar
  35. Lombardo, T., 2007. The Evolution and Psychology of Future Consciousness. Journal of Futures Studies 12(1), 1-24.Google Scholar
  36. Lombardo, T., 2016. Future Consciousness: The Path to Purposeful Evolution-An Introduction. World Futures Review 8(3), 116-140.Google Scholar
  37. Lombardo, T., 2017. Future Consciousness: The Path to Purposeful Evolution. John Hunt, Alresford, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Lombardo, T., Cornish, E., 2010. Wisdom Facing Forward: What It Means to Have Heightened Future Consciousness. The Futurist 44(5), 34-42.Google Scholar
  39. Lübbe, H., 1992. Gegenwartsschrumpfung [Shrinking Present]. In: Kray, R., Pfeiffer, K. L., Studer, T. (Eds.), Autorität. Spektren harter Kommunikation [Authority. Spectra of Tough Communication] 78-91. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Germany.Google Scholar
  40. Marks, M., Mathieu, J., Zaccaro, S., 2001. A Conceptual Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review 26, 356-376.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, B. R., 1995. Foresight in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 7(2), 139-168.Google Scholar
  42. Meadows, D. H., 2008. In: Wright, D. (Ed.). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Earthscan, Sterling, VA.Google Scholar
  43. Michael, R., Cinamon, R. G., Most, T., 2015. What Shapes Adolescents’ Future Perceptions? The Effects of Hearing Loss, Social Affiliation, and Career Self-efficacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 20(4), 399-407.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, R., 2007. Futures Literacy: A Hybrid Strategic Scenario Method. Futures 39(4), 341-362.Google Scholar
  45. Mische, A., 2009. Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action. Sociological Forum 24(3), 694-704.Google Scholar
  46. Mishler, E.G., 1986. The Analysis of Interview-Narratives. In: Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct 233–255. Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  47. Nisbet, R., 1994. History of the Idea of Progress. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  48. Nuttin, J., Lens, W., 1985. Future Time Perspective and Motivation. Leuven University and Erlbaum, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  49. Ogilvy, J., 2011. Facing the Fold: From the Eclipse of Utopia to the Restoration of Hope. Foresight 13(4), 7-23.Google Scholar
  50. Poli, R., 2014. Anticipation: What about Turning the Human and Social Sciences Upside Down? Futures 64, 15-18.Google Scholar
  51. Postma, T. J., Liebl, F., 2005. How to Improve Scenario Analysis as a Strategic Management Tool? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72(2), 161-173.Google Scholar
  52. Postrel, V., 1999. The Future and Its Enemies: The Growing Conflict over Creativity, Enterprise, and Progress. Touchstone, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  53. Rhisiart, M., Miller, R., Brooks, S., 2015. Learning to Use the Future: Developing Foresight Capabilities through Scenario Processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 124-133.Google Scholar
  54. Richter, J., 2003. The Role of the Future in Work Motivation (Doctoral Dissertation). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, and Professional Papers 64(244), UMI No.3093828. University of Montana, Missoula, MT.Google Scholar
  55. Riessman, C., 1993. Narrative Analysis. Sage, London, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Rouse, W., Morris, N., 1986. On Looking Into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models. Psychological Bulletin 100, 349-363.Google Scholar
  57. Sande, Ö., 1972. Future Consciousness. Journal of Peace Research 9, 271-278.Google Scholar
  58. Sarbin, T. R., 1986. The Narrative as a Root Metaphor for Psychology. In: Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.). Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct, 3-21. Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  59. Sardar, Z., 2010. The Namesake: Futures; Futures Studies; Futurology; Futuristic; Foresight-What’s in a Name? Futures 42(3), 177–184.Google Scholar
  60. Scholte, J. A., 2005. Globalization: A Critical Introduction (2nd Ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  61. Schütze, F., 2008. Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyze Autobiographical Narrative Interviews - Part 1 and 2. European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1/2 and 3/4, 153-242 and 5-77.Google Scholar
  62. Seginer, R., 1988. Adolescents Facing the Future: Cultural and Sociopolitical Perspective. Youth and Society 19, 314-333.Google Scholar
  63. Seginer, R., 2009. Future Orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  64. Seligman, M. E., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., Sripada, C., 2013. Navigating into the Future or Driven by the Past. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(2), 119–141.Google Scholar
  65. Seth, S. C., 1989. Futures Consciousness: Technology-Society Nexus and Varying Perceptions of the Future. Futures 21(5), 508-513.Google Scholar
  66. Shamiyeh, M., 2016. Designing from the Future. In: Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F. (Eds.). Design Thinking for Innovation. Research and Practice 193–219. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  67. Slaughter, R., 1996. The Knowledge Base of Future Studies. Vol. 1: Foundations. Melbourne: Futures Study Centre/DDM, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  68. Steinmüller, K., Kreibich, R., Zöpel, C., 2000. Zukunftsforschung in Europa. Ergebnisse und Perspektiven [Futures Study in Europe. Results and Perspectives]. Nomos, Baden-Baden, Germany.Google Scholar
  69. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., Edwards, C. S., 1994. The Consideration of Future Consequences: Weighing Immediate and Distant Outcomes of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(4), 742-752.Google Scholar
  70. Taub, S. F., 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  71. Trommsdorff, G., 1983. Future Orientation and Socialization. International Journal of Psychology 18(1-4), 381–406.Google Scholar
  72. Van der Duin, P.A., Heger, T., Schlesinger, M.D., 2014. Toward Networked Foresight? Exploring the Use of Futures Research in Innovation Networks. Futures 59, 62-78.Google Scholar
  73. Vecchiato, R., 2015. Creating Value through Foresight. First Mover Advantages and Strategic Agility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101, 25-36.Google Scholar
  74. Vervoort, J. M., Bendor, R., Kelliher, A., Strik, O., Helfgott, A. E., 2015. Scenarios and the Art of Worldmaking. Futures 74, 62-70.Google Scholar
  75. Westbrook, L., 2000. Mental Models: A Theoretical Overview and Preliminary Study. Journal of Information Science 32(6), 563-579.Google Scholar
  76. Zimbardo, P. G., Boyd, J. N., 1999. Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individualdifferences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6), 1271-1288.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.insbes. Technologie- und InnovationsmanagementHelmut-Schmidt-UniversitätHamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations