Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Case studies of the digital technology impacts on supply chain disruption risk management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains

Zusammenfassung

Supply chains (SC) have always been vulnerable to natural disasters, economic and political crises or accidents. Modern, interconnected SC networks are particularly vulnerable, since even a relatively small incident can have enormous consequences for the entire network. The greater vulnerability of value chains and the fact that uncertainties, such as earthquakes or political instabilities, cannot be prevented have necessitated active supply chain risk management (SCRM) in supply chain management (SCM) (cf. Chopra/Sodhi 2014, Jüttner 2005, Ivanov and Dolgui 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ambulkar, S., Blackhrst, J., Grawe, S., 2015. Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andelfinger, V., Hänisch, T., 2017. Industrie 4.0: Wie cyber-physische Systeme die Arbeitswelt verändern. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauernhansl, T., Hompel, M., Vogel-Heuser, B., 2014. Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechthold, J., Kern, A., Lauenstein, C., Bernhofer, L., 2014. Industry 4.0 – The Capgemini consulting view: Sharpening the picture beyond the hype. https://www.de.capgemini-consulting.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/capgemini-consulting-industrie-4.0_0.pdf (June 14, 2018).

  • Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K., Craighead, C.W., 2011. An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32, 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., 2004. Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 729–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S., 2004. Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S., 2014. Reducing the Risk of Supply Chain Disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., Meindl, P., 2016. Supply Chain Management. Strategy, Planning and Operation. 6th Edition, Pearson, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., 2016. Logistics and supply chain management. 5th Edition, Pearson, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., Strauss, A., 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4thEdition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., 2018. Ripple Effect in the Supply Chain: An Analysis and Recent Literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L.M., 1996. The use of case study method in logistics research. Journal of business logistics, 17, 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M., Cooper, M. C., 1993. The Relationship between Supply Chain Management and Keiretsu. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 4, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., 2006. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine transaction, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, N., 2017. ERP und Digitalisierung: Eine Billion Dollar für die Cloud. Center for Entreprise Research. http://www.enterprise-research.de/Eine%20Billion%20Dollar%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20Cloud (May 18, 2018).

  • Gupta, V., Sethi, S.P., 2015. Contingent sourcing under supply disruption and competition. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 3006–3027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, J., Sundstrom, M., Egels-Zandén, N., 2016. The digitalization of retailing: An exploratory framework. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44, 694–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, L., 1995. Logistics, agent for change: Shaping the integrated supply chain. Journal of Transportation & Distribution, 36, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J, F Alavifard, D Ivanov, Jahani H. (2018). A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., Talluri, S., 2015. Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 5031–5069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, E., Oettmeier, K., 2016. 3D-Druck: Wie additive Fertigungsverfahren die Wirtschaft und deren Supply Chains revolutionieren. Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation, 85, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview A, 2018. Interview with an expert from a 3D printer manufacturer on June 5, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui A., Sokolov B., Ivanova M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., Dolgui, A., Werner, F., Ivanova, M. (2016). A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 54(2), 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., 2017. Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 2083–2101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., 2018. Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management. Springer Nature, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., 2018. The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D., Dolgui, A. (2018) Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) Supply Chains: A new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience. International Journal of Production Research, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, D., Tsipoulanidis, A., Schönberger, J., 2017. Global Supply Chain and Operations Management. A Decision-oriented Introduction to the Creation of Value. Springer, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N., 2017. Supply Chain Digitalization - Delivering Sustainable Cross-Functional Change. Journal of Business Forecasting, 36, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, U., 2005. Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, 120–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten W., Schröder M., Indorf M. (2017) Potenziale der Digitalisierung für das Supply Chain Risikomanagement: Eine empirische Analyse. In: Seiter M., Grünert L., Berlin S. (eds) Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte von Industrie 4.0. ZfbF-Sonderheft, vol 71/17. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, W., von See B., Indorf, M. (2018) Digitalisierung als Wegbereiter für effizientere Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke. Marktorientiertes Produkt- und Produktionsmanagement in digitalen Umwelten: Festgabe für Klaus Bellmann zum 75. Geburtstag. 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, W. (2018) Geschäftsmodelle in der Industrie 4.0. Handbuch Produktions- und Logistikmanagement in Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N., 2004. Using interviews in qualitative research. In: Cassell, C., Symon, G. (Eds.): Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, 11–22. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilmaz, O., Erol, S., 2017. A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: Shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23, 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, F., Wiedemann, A., 2015. Realigning Risk Management in the Light of Industry 4.0. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2678947 (June 08, 2018).

  • Li J., Jia G., Cheng Y., Hu Y., 2017. Additive manufacturing technology in spare parts supply chain: A comparative study. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 1498–1515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J.R., Corsi, T.M., 2013. Supply Chain Disruption Management: Severe Events, Recovery, and Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 270–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, S., Sarathy, R., Korasiga, V., Bhattacharya, S., Dastidar, S., 2016. Achieving supply chain resilience: The contribution of logistics and supply chain capabilities. Inter-national Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7, 544–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuj, I., Mentzer, J., 2008. Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menn, A., 2014. Sieger Großunternehmen: Otto – Das Online-Orakel. Wirtschaftswoche, http://www.wiwo.de/technologie/forschung/innovationspreis-sieger-grossunternehmen-ottodas-online-orakel/9716214.html (June 18, 2018).

  • Moreira, A.C., Ferreira, L.M., Zimmermann, R., 2018. Innovation and Supply Chain Management. Relationships, Collaboration and Strategies. Springer Nature, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov A., Ivanov D., Dolgui A., Sokolov B. (2018) Hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic approach to supply chain resilience assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(2), 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M., Hackius, N., Kersten, W. (2016) Blockchains für Produktion und Logistik. ZWF - Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, T.J., Fiksel, J., Croxton, K., 2013. Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 46–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E., 2015. How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Buiness Review, 93, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quang, H.T., Hara, Y., 2017. Risks and performance in supply chain: The push effect. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 1369–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, G.R., Singh, H, Hariharan, S., 2016. Supply chain wide transformation of traditional industry to industry 4.0. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11, 11089–11097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., 2017. Don’t Confuse Digital with Digitization. MIT Sloan Management Review, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/dont-confuse-digital-with-digitization (June 5, 2018).

  • Sanders, N.R., 2014. Big Data Driven Supply Chain Management: A Framework for Implementing Analytics and Turning Information into Intelligence. Person Education, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. R., 2016. How to Use Big Data to Drive Your Supply Chain. California Management Review, 58, 26–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreckling, E., Steiger, C., 2017. Digitalize or Drown. In: Oswald, G., Kleinemeier. M. (Eds.): Shaping the Digital Enterprise, 3–27. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M., W. Kersten. (2017) A self-assessment model for supply chain risk management maturity. Conference Proceedings: The 29th NOFOMA conference “Taking on grand challenges”. 642–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuzzoha, A., Helo, P., 2011. Real-time Tracking and Tracing Systems: Potentials for the Logistics Network. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, January 22 – 24, 2011, 242–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., 2015. Preparing for Disruptions Through Early Detection. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtub, A., Karni, R., 2010. ERP. The Dynamics of Supply Chain and Process Management. 2nd Edition, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M.S., Tang, C.S., 2012. Managing supply chain risk. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, M., Fleisch, E., 2015. RFID im Supply Chain Management: Auswirkungen und Handlungsempfehlungen am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Deutscher Universitäts Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. S., 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 451–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakharia, A.J., Yenipazarli, A., 2009. Managing Supply Chain Disruptions. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 2, 243–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., Frohlich, M., 2002. Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Jung, Y., 2018. Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier Science & Technology, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Economics, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Deutschland

    Simone Gottlieb & Dmitry Ivanov

  2. Narendra Paul Loomba Department of Management, Zicklin School of Business, New York, United States

    Ajay Das

Authors
  1. Simone Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dmitry Ivanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajay Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Technologie- und Prozessmanagement, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland

    Meike Schröder

  2. Fakultät Handel und Soziale Arbeit, Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Suderburg, Niedersachsen, Deutschland

    Kirsten Wegner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gottlieb, S., Ivanov, D., Das, A. (2019). Case studies of the digital technology impacts on supply chain disruption risk management. In: Schröder, M., Wegner, K. (eds) Logistik im Wandel der Zeit – Von der Produktionssteuerung zu vernetzten Supply Chains. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25412-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25411-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25412-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation