Abstract
This paper explores two ways to integrate more imagination into foresight studies: through the use of wild cards and through the utilization of science fiction. Both follow the principle of “What if…” and both are aimed at imagining surprising events or developments. In both cases, thought experiment starts with an assumption – the invented wild card or the novum of science fiction (element of difference to our real world) and searches for possible implications. Foresight needs neither pure daydreaming, nor incoherent fantasies, but – paradoxically – stringent, methodologically controlled kinds of imagination. With this background, differences and commonalities of science fiction and foresight are discussed. Whilst the science fiction writer often indulges himself in an excess of imagination, futures studies often lack it.
Two EU projects – IKNOW and FESTOS – are taken as examples for the methodological integration of collective and individual imagination within foresight processes. Putting wild cards or science fiction ideas into context implies to fathom plausible social, political, economical, and cultural consequences, counter-intuitive findings and surprises included.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BIPE Conseil, Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies, Institute for the Future (1992). Wild Cards: A Multinational Perspective. Palo Alto: Institute for the Future.
Clarke, A. C. (1974). Profiles of the Future. An inquiry into the limits of the possible. London: Gollancz.
Clute, J. & Nicholls, P. (Eds.) (1993).The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. London: Orbit.
ESA (European Space Agency) (2002). Innovative Technologies from Science Fiction for Space Applications. Noordwijk: ESA Publications Division.
Hauptman, A. & Sharan, Y. (2013). Foresight of Evolving Security Threats Posed by Emerging Technologies. Foresight: the journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, 15 (5), 375-391.
Hauptman, A., Hoppe, M. and Raban, Y. (2015). Wild Cards in Transport. European Journal of Futures Research, 3 (7), 1-24.
Hiltunen, E. (2010). Weak Signal in Organizational Futures Learning (Thesis). Aalto University School of Economics.
Hiltunen, E. (2006). Was It a Wild Card or Just Our Blindness to Gradual Change? Journal of Futures Studies, 11 (2), 61-74.
Holopainen M. & Toivonen, M. (2012). Weak Signals – Ansoff Today. Futures, 44 (3), 198-205.
Ilmola, L. & Kuusi, O. (2006). Filters of weak signals hinder foresight: monitoring weak signals efficiently in corporate decision-making. Futures, 38 (8), 908-924.
Lambourne, R., Shallis, M. & Shortland, M. (1990). Close Encounters? Science and Science Fiction. Bristol/New York: Institute of Physics Publishing.
Livingston, D. (1969). Science Fiction as a Source of Forecast Material. Futures, 1 (3), 232-238.
Livingston, D. (1978). The Utility of Science Fiction. In J. Fowles (Ed.). Handbook of Futures Research (163 – 178). Westport/Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Malmgren, C. D. (1991). Worlds Apart. Narratology of Science Fiction. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Mendonça, S., Pina e Cunha, M., Kaivo-oja, J. & Ruff, F. (2004). Wild cards, weak signals and organisational improvisation. Futures, 36 (2), 201-218.
Moskowitz, S. (1974). Explorers of the Infinite. Shapers of Science Fiction. Westport/Conn.: Hyperion Press.
Petersen, J. L. (1997). Out of the Blue, Wild Cards and Other Big Surprises. Washington: The Arlington Institute. (Re-edition as Petersen, J. L. (2000). Out of the Blue, How to Anticipate Big Future Surprises. Lanham: Madison Books.)
Petersen, J. L. & Steinmüller, K. (2009). Wild Cards. In J. C. Glenn (Ed.). Futures research methodology. Version 3.0. Washington, D.C.: The Millennium Project (CD-Rom).
Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2011). Foresight. Presentation in “Framing Futures Studies: Science, Technology and Global Challenges”. International Workshop, 19-21 July 2011. Available at: www.futures-studies.rwth-aachen.de/engl_workshop.html
Schwartz, P. & Randall, D. (2007). Anticipating Strategic Surprises. In F. Fukuyama (Ed.). Blindside - How to Anticipate Forcing Events and Wild Cards in Global Politics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Steinmüller, A & Steinmüller, K. (2004). Wild Cards. Wenn das Unwahrscheinliche eintritt. Hamburg: Murmann.
Steinmüller, K. (2003). The uses and abuses of science fiction. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28 (3), 175-178.
Steinmüller, K. (2010). Science Fiction: eine Quelle von Leitbildern für Innovationsprozesse und ein Impulsgeber für Foresight. In K. Hauss, S. Ulrich & S. Hornbostel (Eds.). Foresight – Between Science and Fiction (19-31). iFQ-Working Paper No. 7. Bonn: Institut für Forschungsinformation und Qualitätssicherung.
Steinmüller, K. (2007). Thinking Out of the Box. Weak Signals and Wild Cards for European Regions. Futura, 2/2007, 22-29.
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. London/New Haven: Yale.
Taleb, N. (2008). The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. London: Penguin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hauptman, A., Steinmüller, K. (2018). Surprising Scenarios. Imagination as a Dimension of Foresight. In: Peperhove, R., Steinmüller, K., Dienel, HL. (eds) Envisioning Uncertain Futures . Zukunft und Forschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25074-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25074-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25073-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25074-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)