Skip to main content

Charging Tariffs for Electric Vehicles and the Possibility of Flexible Charging Tariffs to Optimize the Charging Infrastructure

  • Chapter
Digitalen Wandel gestalten

Abstract

The mobility of the future will be electric – this fact is more certain than ever before. But the mass adoption of clean and electric transportation systems will not happen overnight. It requires a comprehensive and powerful charging infrastructure first and it has to be profitable for the owner to operate a station. To improve the current charging infrastructure, innovative ways of setting charging tariffs are presented in this article. The objective is to optimize the user-experience for drivers of electric vehicles and simultaneously maximize the profit for owners by ensuring a stable energy grid and the availability of charging stations whenever and wherever needed. To reach this, simple laws of economic sciences are combined with the possibilities of digitization. The developed best practice of setting tariffs not only helps to build a comprehensive charging infrastructure, it also encourages the use of electric vehicles as a medium to store huge amounts of over capacities produced by renewable energy sources thus solving a number of issues concerning the energy revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of references

  • AirBnB, Inc. (publisher) (2018), About us, press.atairbnb.com, accessed 05 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Allego B.V. (2018), Interview with the Account Manager Interoperability, 25 April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Andor, M., Flinkerbusch, K., Janssen, M., Liebau, B., Wobben, M. (2010), Negative Strompreise und der Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien, in: Energiewirtschaft 34, p. 91

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyond Pricing (publisher) (2018), How it Works, beyondpricing.com, Ten Twenty-Four, Inc., accessed 04 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitar, E., Xu, Y. (2017), Deadline Differentiated Pricing of Deferrable Electric Loads, published in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (Volume 8, Issue: 1), IEEE (publisher), p. 13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M. (2017), ADAC autotest VW Passat Variant GTE DSG, https://www.adac.de/_ext/itr/tests/Autotest/AT5573_VW_Passat_Variant_GTE_DSG/VW_Passat_Variant_GTE_DSG.pdf, Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil-Club e.V. (publisher), accessed 13 April 2018

  • e-clearing.net (2018), About us, www.e-clearing.net, smartlab Innovationsgesellschaft mbH (publisher), accessed 07 May 2018

  • European Energy Exchange AG (publisher) (2018), Auction | EPEX SPOT, www.eex.com, accessed 16 April 2018

  • European Energy Exchange AG (publisher) (2018), List of Trading Participants, www.eex.com, accessed 17 May 2018

  • EVBox (2018), Interview with the Senior Architect and Head of Software Development, 18 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • EVBox B.V. (publisher) (2017), Charging Management, www.evbox.com, accessed 15 May 2018

  • EVBox B.V. (publisher) (2017), Five things to learn before buying an electric car, Amsterdam, p. 4 and p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, T., Krems, J. F. (2013), Transportation Research Part F, Understanding Charging Behaviour of Electric Vehicle Users, Elsevier Ltd. (publisher), p. 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. (2017), These are the biggest risks the world faces, www.weforum.org, World Economic Forum (publisher), accessed 23 March 2018

  • Hall, D., Lutsey, N. (2017), Emerbing Best Practises for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, International Council on Clean Transportation (publisher), Washington, p. 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Haucap, J., Heimeshoff, U., Kehder, C., Odenkirchen, J., Thorwarth, S. (2017), The Effects of the Market Transparency Unit for Fuels in Germany, Wirtschaftsdienst 2017, Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (publisher), Hamburg, p. 725

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth & Partners (2016), Durchschnittliche Reichweite von Elektrofahrzeugen nähert sich der 250-Kilometer-Marke, www.horvath-partners.com, Horváth AG (publisher), accessed 19 April 2018

  • Humphrey, T., (1992) Marshallian Cross Diagrams and Their Uses before Alfred Marshall, Economic Review, Mar/Apr, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (publisher), location N/A, 1992, p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2017), CO2 emissions from fuel combustion Highlights, IEA/OECD (publisher), Paris, p. 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt (2017), www.kba.de, Verkehr in Kilometern der deutschen Kraftfahrzeuge im Jahr 2016, accessed 11 April 2018

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs (publisher) (2017), Vision on the Charging Infrastructure for Electric Transport, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghianpourhamami, N., Refa, N., Strobbe, M., Develder, C., International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Quantitive Analysis of Electric Vehicle Flexibility: A data-driven approach, Elsevier Ltd. (publisher), Ghent, Arnhem, 2018, p. 455

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, B. (2018), HFT Stuttgart, Interview in Mai 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. (2017), Nachfrageseitige Flexibilitätsoptionen: Demand-Side-Management, Energiespeicher und Regelenergie in Industrielle Energiestrategie, Wiesbaden, p. 258

    Google Scholar 

  • sonnen GmbH (2018), Interview with the Project Manager “sonnenCharger”, 18 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • sonnen GmbH (publisher) (2017), Unsere Stromtarife, sonnen.de, accessed 2 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßenverkehrsordnung, § 23 as amended by Law from 06 March 2013 (BGB l. I S. 367)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Yamamoto, T., Morikawa, T. (2015), Transportation Research Part D, Charge Timing Choice Behaviour of Battery Electric Vehicle U, Elsevier Ltd., p. 100

    Google Scholar 

  • The Boston Consulting Group (publisher) (2017), The Electric Car Tipping Point, Research Highlights, Boston, p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • TransnetBW GmbH (2018), Interview with the Consultant for Control Reserve and Interruptible Loads, 15 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • TransnetBW GmbH (publisher) (2018), Who we are, www.transnetbw.com, accessed 15 May 2018

  • Uber Technologies Inc. (publisher) (2018), Company Information, www.uber.com, accessed 05 May 2018

  • Wilkens, A. (2017), Kriterien für den Kauf eines Elektrofahrzeugs, GfK-Study raised by Tank & Rast between 2 June and 9 June 2017, www.heise.de, Heise Medien GmbH & Co. KG (publisher), accessed 3 May 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutter, P., Lochmahr, A. (2019). Charging Tariffs for Electric Vehicles and the Possibility of Flexible Charging Tariffs to Optimize the Charging Infrastructure. In: Lochmahr, A., Müller, P., Planing, P., Popović, T. (eds) Digitalen Wandel gestalten. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24651-8_5.1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24651-8_5.1

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24650-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24651-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics