Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Umsetzung des RMs: Stand der Forschung in Bezug auf die organisatorische Verankerung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitatives Risikomanagement in der Immobilienwirtschaft

  • 3800 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Ausgehend von den im Detail hergeleiteten Anforderungen an ein immobilienwirtschaftliches RM (vgl. Kapitel 2) wird im Folgenden die organisatorische Verankerung des RMs präsentiert (siehe Abb. 3.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • BaFin. (2015). Risikokultur. BaFin Journal (August 2015), S. 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerle, T. (2017). Vom Leben mit Risiko - Risikoanalyse europäischer Gewerbeimmobilieninvestments bis 2020, in: Bienert, S., & Frank R. (Hrsg.): Europäisierung der Immobilienkapitalmärkte, Bd. 18, Regensburg, S. 64–71).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienert, S. (2015). Corporate Governance bei Immobilienunternehmen, in: Bienert, S., et al. (Hrsg.): Nachhaltige Unternehmensführung in der Immobilienwirtschaft, Köln, S. 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernobai, A., Jorion, P., & Yu, F. (2011). The Determinants of Operational Risk in U.S. Financial Institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), S. 1683–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2004). Enterprise Risk Management Framework (COSO II), Jersey New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2017). Enterprise Risk Management - Integrating with Strategy and Performance, 1, Jersey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M., & Gallagher, R. (2015). The Valuation Implications of Enterprise Risk Management Maturity. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(3), S. 625–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleißner, W. (2016). The Last Line of Defense: Der Aufsichtsrat. Der Aufsichtsrat(6), S. 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), S. 795–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Initiative Corporate Governance der deutschen Immobilienwirtschaft. (2013). Wertemanagement in der Immobilienwirtschaft. (Initiative Corporate Governance, Herausgeber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Initiative Corporate Governance der deutschen Immobilienwirtschaft. (2017). Corporate Governance Kodex der deutschen Immobilienwirtschaft. (Initiative Corporate Governance, Herausgeber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (2015). Banking Perspective: Understanding risk culture and its challenges. The Clearing House, 2, S. 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonghe, F., Edelsten, M., & Xavier, I. (2013). The Cultural Revolution in Risk Management. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 1(1), S. 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, T., & Lausberg, C. (2017). Immobilienrisiken - Zwischen externen Schocks und selbstgemachten Problemen. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2011). Dangerous biases can creep into every strategic choice. Here’s how to find them before they lead you astray. Harvard Business Review, 6, S. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajüter, P. (2010). Konzernweites Risikomanagement – Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und empirische Befunde. In M. Reimer, & S. Fiege, Perspektiven des Strategischen Controllings (S. 313–328). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends (1), S. 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löffler, H., Zähres, R., & Augsten Tobias (2011). Risikomanagement im Mittelstand, Nürnberg/Hamburg: Funk RMCE, Rödl & Partner, Weissman & Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, M. K., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does Enterprise Risk Management Increase Firm Value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(4), S. 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2009). Praktische Hinweise zum so genannten Risikomanagement. Hans Böckler Stiftung. Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A., Rustambekov, E., McShane, M., & Fainshmidt, S. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management as a Dynamic Capability: A test of its effectiveness during a crisis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(8), S. 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packham, N., Fritz-Morgenthal, S., & Hellmuth, J. (2015). Does risk culture matter? The relationship between risk culture indicators and stress test results. Journal of Risk Management in Financal Institutions, 7, S. 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2003). The invention of operational risk, in: Centre for Analysis and Regulation at the London School of Economics and Political Science (Hrsg.): Disusscion Paper No. 16, London, S. 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • PwC. (2012). The ‘Virtual Reality’ of Treasury. (PwC, Herausgeber) Abgerufen von Global Treasury Benchmark Survey: https://www.treasury-management.com/article/4/383/3247/the-virtualreality-of-treasury.html

  • Sheedy, E., & Griffin, B. (2018). Risk governance, structures, culture, and behavior: A view from the inside. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(1), S. 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland

    Cay Oertel

Authors
  1. Cay Oertel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cay Oertel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oertel, C. (2019). Umsetzung des RMs: Stand der Forschung in Bezug auf die organisatorische Verankerung. In: Quantitatives Risikomanagement in der Immobilienwirtschaft. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23971-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23971-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23970-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23971-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation