Advertisement

Bridging the theory-practice gap in teacher education: The design and construction of simulation-based learning environments

  • Karen De ConinckEmail author
  • Martin Valcke
  • Ine Ophalvens
  • Ruben Vanderlinde
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Clinical simulations have recently been presented as a promising instructional strategy to overcome the theory-practice gap in teacher education. Taking this into account, this chapter aims to enhance insight into the core ideas underlying the design and construction of simulation-based learning environments. For this purpose, this chapter first presents a general design framework. Next, the construction process and two prototypes of simulation-based learning environments in the context of parent-teacher communication — an online and a face-to-face prototype — are described.

Schlüsselwörter

simulation-based learning environments design principles parent-teacher communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aper, L. (2015). Teaching and learning the art of conducting consultations: exploring effective and efficient training opportunities within the medical curriculum. Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
  2. Badiee, F. & Kaufman, D. (2015). Design evaluation of a simulation for teacher education. Accessed on April 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244015592454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychology Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., and Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boril, J., Leuchter, J., Smrz, V., & Blasch, E. (2015). Aviation simulation training in Czech air force. Accessed March 2018 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=7311484
  8. Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Education Research Journal, 26(17), 473-498.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educa-tional Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caena, F. (2014). Teacher Competence Frameworks in Europe: Policy‐as‐discourse and policy‐as‐practice. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Bruïne, E., Willemse, T. M., D’Haem, J., Griswold, P., Vloeberghs, L., & van Eynde, S. (2014). Preparing teacher candidates for family–school partnerships. European Journal of Teacher Edu-cation, 37, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Coninck, K. Valcke, M. & Vanderlinde, R. (2018). A measurement of student teachers’ parent-teacher communication competences: The design of a video-based instrument. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Oliveira, S. N., do Pardro, M. L., Kempfer, S. S., Martini, J. M., Caravaca-Morera, J. A., & Bernandi, M. C. (2015). Experiential learning in nursing consultation education via clinical simula-tions with actors: Action research. Nurse Education Today, 35(2), 50-54.Google Scholar
  14. Deakin Crick, R. (2008). Key competencies for education in a European context. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dieker, L., Rodriguez, J., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Hynes, M., & Hughes, C. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dotger, B. H. (2013). “I had no idea”: Clinical simulations for teacher development. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Dotger, B. H., Harris, S., & Hansel, A. (2008). Emerging authenticity: The crafting of simulated parent-teacher candidate conferences. Teaching Education, 19, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drews, F. A. & Backdash, J. D. (2013). Simulation training in health care. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 8, 191–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, J. L. & Sanders, M. G (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81, 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
  21. EVALO (2012). Als het krijtstof neerdaalt… Een bijdrage aan de beleidsevaluatie van de lerarenopleidingen in Vlaanderen [A Contribution to the Policy Evaluation of Teacher Education Institutes in Flanders]. Accessed March 2018 from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/leraar/bestanden/2012-12-07-EVALO.pdf
  22. Evans, M. P. (2013). Educating pre-service teachers for family, school, and community engagement. Teaching Education, 24, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fanning, R. M. & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2) 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferry, B., Kervin, K., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., & Puglise, S. (2004). Online simulations: The next wave for pre-service teacher education? Accessed March 2018 from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/perth04/procs/ferry.html
  25. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., & Carrington, L. (2009) Enhancing educator development through an online simulation. In Kong, S. C., Ogata, H., Arnseth, H. C., Chan, C. K. K., Hirashima, T., Klett, F., Lee, J. H. M., Liu, C. C., Looi, C. K., Milrad, M., Mitrovic, A., Nakabayashi, K., Wong, S. L., Yang, S. J. H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Educa-tion [CDROM]. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.Google Scholar
  26. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Karsten, G., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Modellierung und Assessment professioneller Gesprächsführungskompetenz von Lehrpersonen im Lehrer-Elterngespräch [Modeling and assessing teachers‘ professional communicative competence in parent-teacher conversation]. In: O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Ed.), Stationen Empirischer Bildungsforschung. Traditionslinien und Perspektiven [Stages of empirical educational research. Lines of tradition and perspectives] (pp. 412–426). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., Möller, G. E., Wiesbeck, A., & Prenzel, M. (2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: Effect of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Accessed on March 2018 from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11251-014-9341-6.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibson, D. C., Knezek, G., Redmond, P., & Bradley, E. (2014). Handbook of games and simulations in teacher education (pp. 1-66). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  29. Grossman, P. (2010). Learning to practice:The design of clinical experience in teacher preparation. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and National Education Association.Google Scholar
  30. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  31. Issenberg, S. B., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeffries, P. R., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2015). NLN Jeffries simulation theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 292-293.Google Scholar
  33. Kielhofner G. (2005). Research concepts in clinical scholarship. Scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), 231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. König, J. & Kramer, C. (2016). Teacher professional knowledge and classroom management: On the relation of general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) and classroom management expertise (CME). ZDM, 48(1-2), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korthagen, F. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational researcher, 28(4), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teachers: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lateef, F. (2010). Simulation based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 3(4), 348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. McKenney, S. & Reeves, T.C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merchie, E., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). Hoe kan je de impact van professionalisering voor leraren in kaart brengen? Departement Onderwijs en Vorming.Google Scholar
  43. Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research 51(4), 455–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker, J. M. T. & Dotger, B.H. (2012). Because wisdom can’t be told: Using comparison of simu-lated parent-teacher conferences to assess teacher candidates’ readiness for family-school part-nership. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen De Coninck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Valcke
    • 1
  • Ine Ophalvens
    • 1
  • Ruben Vanderlinde
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations