Skip to main content

Einflussfaktoren des Sharing-Verhaltens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ShareCity

Zusammenfassung

Als Grundlage für eine Gestaltung der Sharing Economy sind Kenntnisse über die Einflussfaktoren des Sharing-Verhaltens der Bevölkerung erforderlich. Direkte Einflussfaktoren sind Verhaltenstreiber, die vor allem psychologische Faktoren betreffen. Zunächst spielt der Nutzen, den Sharing-Angebote versprechen, eine Rolle. Dabei können funktionale, hedonistische oder soziale Nutzen relevant sein. Zudem sind Vertrauen, die soziale Norm sowie Persönlichkeitsmerkmale relevant. Diese direkten Faktoren können durch diverse externe Faktoren, wie die Merkmale einer Sharing-Plattform und auch die Massnahmen einer Stadtverwaltung, beeinflusst werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Roberts, J. (2005). Carsharing in North America. Market growth, current developments, and future potential. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series 1986. https://doi.org/10.3141/1986-17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Midgley, P. (2011). Bicycle-sharing schemes: Enhancing sustainable mobility in urban areas: United Nations, Department of economic and social affairs. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/dsd/resources/res_pdfs/csd-19/Background-Paper8-P.Midgley-Bicycle.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Aug. 2018.

  3. Ricci, M. (2015). Bike sharing. A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 15, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmitz, K., & Hoppe, W. D. (2015). Global automotive mobility study. An end customer perspective on shared cars, autonomous vehicles and electric cars. Arthur D. Little.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frick, K., Hauser, M., & Gürtler, D. (2013). Sharity – Die Zukunft des Teilens. GDI (GDI Studie Nr. 39).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hellwig, K., Morhart, F., Girardin, F., & Hauser, M. (2015). Exploring different types of sharing. A proposed segmentation of the market for “sharing” businesses. Psychology & Marketing, 32(9), 891–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Federspiel, E., & Schaffner, D. (2014). Vertrauen auf Transaktionsplattformen im Internet. Schlussbericht Forschungsprojekt Vertrauen auf Transaktionsplattformen, Hochschule Luzern.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belk, R. (2014). Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0. Anthropologist, 18(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zentes, J., Freer, T., & Beham, F. (2013). Neue Mietkonzepte. Nutzen statt Haben – Potenziale und Herausforderungen für Unternehmen. Insititut für Handel & Internationales Marketing (H.I.MA.) der Universität des Saarlandes.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., & Medders, R. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moser, M., et al. (2016). Shared Mobility – Kollaborative Mobilitätsservices europäischer Städte im Vergleich. Winterthur. https://www.zhaw.ch/storage/hochschule/medien/shared-mobility-deut.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Aug. 2018.

  12. Rauch, D., & Schleicher, D. (2014). Like Uber, but for local government law. The future of local regulatoin of the sharing economy. Ohio State Law Journal, 76, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hampshire, R. C., & Gaites, C. (2011). Peer-to-peer carsharing. Market analysis and potential growth. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 217, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schegg, R., Favre, P., Déletroz, N., & Larpin, B. (2015). Airbnb – Ungebrochenes Wachstum im Wallis und in der Schweiz. Auswertung einer Analyse des Airbnb Angebots in der Schweiz. Siders, Walliser Tourismus Observatorium, HES-SO Wallis.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grampp, M., Zobrist, L., & Abegg, A. (2016). Die Sharing Economy in der Schweiz. Mehr, weniger oder neue Regulieurngen? Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/ch/de/pages/consumer-industrial-products/articles/the-sharing-economy-in-switzerland.html. Zugegriffen: 23. Aug. 2018.

  16. Fischer-Baum, R., & Bialik, C. (2015). Uber is taking millions Of Manhattan rides away from taxis. FiveThrityEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/uber-is-taking-millions-of-manhattan-rides-away-from-taxis/. Zugegriffen: 16. Aug. 2018.

  17. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy. Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (July 2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi23552.

  18. Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine. A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaffner, D., Georgi, D., & Federspiel, E. (2017). Comparing customer experiences and usage intentions regarding peer-to-peer sharing platforms with conventional online booking websites: The role of social, hedonic, and functional values. In P. Rossi (Hrsg), Marketing at the confluence between entertainment and analytics. Proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) World Marketing Congress (S. 1049–1056). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson, L. (2015). Performing the shairng economy. Geoforum, 67(Dezember), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stein, S., & Resha, J (2010). Shared parking in the Portland metropolitan area. Stein engineering. https://www.alexandriava.gov/uploadedFiles/planning/info/SharedParkingInThePortlandMetropolitanArea.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. Juli 2018.

  22. Eichhorst, W., & Spermann, A. (2015). Sharing Economy – Chancen, Risiken und Gestaltungsoptionen für den Arbeitsmarkt. IZA Research Report No. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Utz, S., Kerkhof, P., & Van den Bos, J. (2012). Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhuiyan, T. (2010). A survey on the relationship between trust and interest similarity in online social networks. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(4), 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Everard, A., & Galletta, D. F. (2006). How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 55–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu, J. J., Chen, Y. H., & Chung, Y. S. (2010). Trust factors influencing virtual community members: A study of transaction communities. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1025–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lauterbach, D., Truong, H., Shah, T., & Adamic, L. (2009). Surfing a web of trust: Reputation and reciprocity on couchsurfing.com. International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Basso, A., Goldberg, D., Greenspan, S., & Weimer, D. (2001). First impressions: Emotional and cognitive factors underlying judgments of trust e-commerce. ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Tampa, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McArthur, E. (2015). Many-to-many exchange without money. Why people share their resources. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(3), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption. Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nica, E. (2015). The social sustainability of the sharing economy. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 10(4), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gauthier, A., et al. (2013). The Bike-share Planning Guide. New York: ITDP. https://www.itdp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ITDP_Bike_Share_Planning_Guide.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Aug. 2018.

  34. Gossen, M. (2012). Nutzen statt Besitzen. Motive und Potenziale der internetgestützten gemeinsamen Nutzung am Beispiel des Peer-to-Peer Car-Sharing. In Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (Hrsg.), Schriftenreihe des IÖW 202/12. Berlin: Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ballús-Armet, I., Shaheen, S. A., Clonts, K., & Weinzimmer, D. (2014). Peer-to-peer carsharing. Exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco Bay area, California. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Airbnb. (2015). Kennzahlen zu Airbnb weltweit Stand 2015. Zugegriffen: 21. Juni 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Georgi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Georgi, D. et al. (2019). Einflussfaktoren des Sharing-Verhaltens. In: ShareCity. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23700-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23700-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23699-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23700-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics