Skip to main content

Chancengleichheit. Eine elementare Formalisierung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wirtschaftliche Ungleichheit
  • 3280 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Unsere Frage war, wann man davon sprechen kann, dass Chancengleichheit besteht. Die negative Antwort auf diese Frage lautet: Ergebnisgleichheit ist kein brauchbarer Indikator für Chancengleichheit. Aus ungleichen Ergebnissen darf nicht auf ungleiche Chancen geschlossen werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bourgignon, François, Francisco H.Ferreira und Maria Menéndez, 2007: Inequality of Opportunity in Brazil. In: Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 53, S. 585-618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgignon, François, Francisco H. Ferreira und Michael Walton, 2007: Equity, Efficiency and Inequality Traps: A Research Agenda. In: Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 5, S. 235-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, Paolo, Francisco H. Ferreira und Vito Peragine, 2013: Inequality of Opportunity, Income Inequality and Economic Mobility: Some International Comparisons. ECINEQ Working Paper 284.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Checchi, Daniele, Vito Peragine und Laura Selenga, 2010: Fair and Unfair Income Inequalities in Europe. ECINEQ Working Paper 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, Francisco H. und Jerémie Gignoux, 2011: The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and an Application to Latin America. In: Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 57(4), S. 622-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, Marc und Vito Peragine, 2013: Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Equality of Opportunity. In: Economica, Vol. 80, S. 118-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, James und Artyom Shneyerov, 2000: Path Independent Inequality Measures. In: Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 91, S. 199-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John E., 1998: Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John E., 2006: Review Essay: »The 2006 World Development Report: Equity and Development«. In: Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 4, S. 233-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John E. und Alain Trannoy, 2016: Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement. In: Journal of Economic Literature, Band LIV, Heft 4, S. 1288- 1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de gaer, Dirk, 1993: Equality of Opportunity and Investment in Human Capital. PhD Dissertation Leuven University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Berger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berger, J. (2019). Chancengleichheit. Eine elementare Formalisierung. In: Wirtschaftliche Ungleichheit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23682-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23682-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23682-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics