Skip to main content

Practical Wisdom: A Key to a Successful Implementation of Lateral Leadership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Practical Wisdom and Diversity

Part of the book series: Wirtschaft – Organisation – Personal ((WOP))

  • 954 Accesses

Abstract

In change processes lateral leadership is often considered to be a post-heroic management concept which focuses on systematic procedures integrated in the organizational structure and agreed upon by all members of the organization. Facing economic, political and societal changes, managers tend to ignore that in practice lateral leadership requires a basic reflection of the framework conditions of leadership in the whole organization. This article explores how Practical wisdom in conjunction with a sound psychological background in the fields of wisdom and leadership can build a bridge for a successful implementation of lateral leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alammar, F. &Pauleen, D. (2016). Exploring managers´ conceptions of wisdom as management practice. Journal of Management of Organization, 22:4, pp. 550 – 565. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo2015.53.

  • Ardelt, M. (2005). Foreword. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (Eds.), A Handbook of Wisdom. Psychological Perspectives (pp. Xi-Xvii.). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed). Malden, Mass: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass. [a.o.]: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B.J. & Bass, B.M. (Eds.) (2001). Developing Potential Across a Full Range of Leadership TM: TM Cases on Transactional and Transformational Leadership. New York: Psychology Press - Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. (1999). Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8 (1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410.

  • Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I. & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 207 – 218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207

  • Bass, B. M. & Riggio; R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth, J. B. (2005). Putting Exchange Back into Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): An Empirical Assessment of a Social Exchange (LMXS) Scale and an Investigation of Personality as an Antecedent. Dissertation submitted to the Auburn University. Auburn: Auburn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binyamin, G., Friedman, A. & Carmeli, A. (2017). Reciprocal Care in Hierarchical Exchange: Implications for Psychological Safety and Innovative Behaviors at Work. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000129

  • Birren, J. E. & Fisher, L. M. (1990). The elements of wisdom: overview and integration. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom. Its nature, origins and development (pp. 317-332). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour, L. (1980). Externalist theories of empirical knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5 (1), 53 – 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Kirkman, B.L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D. & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study on leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. The Journal of applied psychology, 92 (2), 331 – 346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331

  • Clayton, V. P. (1975). Erikson’s theory of human development as it applies to the aged: Wisdom as contradictory cognition. Human Development, 18, 119-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Rathunde, K. (1990). The psychology of wisdom: an evolutionary interpretation. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom. Its nature, origins and development (pp. 25-51). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppler, K. & Lauterburg, C. (2014). Change Management. Den Unternehmenswandel gestalten (10th updated and extended ed.). Frankfurt / New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtner, M.R., Maran, T. & Rauthmann, J.F. (2017). Dark Leadership: The role of leaders´ Dark Triad personality traits. In M. Clark & C. Gruber (Eds.), Leader Development Deconstructed. Annuals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 15). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64740-1_4.

  • Graen, G.B. & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, (9), 175 – 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1989): The Age of Unreason. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.G. & Dodge, G.E. (2000). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The Leadership Quaterly, 11 (4), 435 – 458. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00058-8

  • Hunt, J. G. & Ropo, A. (1998). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, 24, 289 – 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intezari, A. & Pauleen, D.J. (2014). Management Wisdom in Perspective: Are You Virtuous Enough to Succeed in Volatile Times? Journal of Business Ethics, 120, pp. 393 – 404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1666-6.

  • Kastner, M. (2009). Umgang mit Belastungen und Anforderungen. In L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Führung von Mitarbeitern (pp. 88 – 96). Stuttgart: Schäffer – Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. (2013). Homo oeconomicus: das ökonomische Modelle individuellen Handelns und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (4th supplemented and updated ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J.P. (2009). Das Prinzip Dringlichkeit: schnell und konsequent handeln im Management. Frankfurt/Main (a. o.): Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, D. (2000). Wisdom as a classical source of human strength Conceptualizig and empirical injury. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 83 – 1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. (2017). Laterales Führen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13429-7.

  • Kühl, S. & Schnelle, T. (2005). Laterales Führen. Wenn Hierarchie nur begrenzt zur Verfügung steht. In J. Aderhold, M. Meyer & R. Wetzel (Hrsg.), Modernes Netzwerk-Management. Anforderungen – Methoden – Anwendungsfelder (pp. 188 – 212). Wiesbaden: Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler/GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, U. & Baltes, P. B. (2003). Wisdom related Knowledge. Affective, Motivational, and Interpersonal Correlates. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1104-1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1973). Zurechnung von Beförderungen im öffentlichen Dienst. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 2, p. 326 – 351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2007). Change Management. Darstellung und Bewertung der Ansätze von Lewin, Bullock & Batten, Kotter, Beckhard & Harris, Senge, Stacey & Shaw. Ort: Müchen: GRIN Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., Rooney, D. & Boal, K.B. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 20, 177–190. doi:10.1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. (1990). The loss of wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Wisdom. Its nature, origins and development. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D.M. & Kramer; R.M. (2004). The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (2011). The Big Idea: The Wise Leader. Harvard Business 89 (5), 58 -67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. & Economy, P. (2017). Management für Dummies – Lassen Sie sich zu Ihrer Führungsrolle führen. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L. & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1), 403 – 445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasupathi, M. & Staudinger, U.M. (2001). Do advanced moral reasoners also show wisdom? Linking moral reasoning and wisdom related knowledge and judgement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25 (5), 401 – 415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleen, D. J., Rooney, D. & Holden, N. (2010). Practical Wisdom and the development of cross-cultural knowledge management: A global leadership perspective. European Journal of International Management, 4 (2), 382 – 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösing, I. (2006). Weisheit. Meterware, Maßschneiderung, Missbrauch. Kröning: Asanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership (3rd Edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. & Wilkens, U. (2009). Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement im Aufgabenfeld von Führungskräften. In L. von Rosenstiel, E. Regnet & M. Domsch (Hrsg.), Führung von Mitarbeitern (S. 590 – 600). Stuttgart: Schäffer- Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangel-Meseke, M., Hahn, P. & Steuer, L. (2013.). Balance durch Diversity-Management - Lösungsansätze für unternehmerische Herausforderungen aus Megatrends. In R. Lanwehr, M. Müller-Lindenberg & D. Mai (Hrsg.), Balance Management (S. 145 – 166). Berlin/Heidelberg: SpringerGabler

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangel-Meseke, M., Hahn, P. Steuer, L. (2015). Diversity Management und Individualisierung. Berlin: SpringerGabler Essentials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M., Lopez, D. & Baltes, P. B. (1997). The Psychometric Location of Wisdom Related Performance: Intelligence, Personality and More? Personality and Social Psychology 23(11), 1200-1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudinger, U. M. & Leipold, B. (2003). The Assessment of Wisdom-Related Performance. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment (pp. 171–184). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity synthesized. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöwe, S. & Keromosemito, L. (2013). Führen ohne Hierarchie – Laterale Führung. Wiesbaden: SpringerGabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77 – 100). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33 – 47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierau-Brunner, H., Wottawa, H. & Stangel-Meseke, M. (2006). Evaluation von Personalentwicklungsmaßnahmen. In K. Sonntag (Hrsg.), Personalentwicklung in Organisationen (3rd ed.; pp. 329–354). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2008). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (6), 645 – 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

  • Vermeren, P. (2014). Around Leadership. Bridging the Scientist-Practitioner-Gap (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Around Publishing Pty. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, U. (2013). Dimensionen von Weisheit in Führung und Management - Entwicklung eines Fragebogeninstruments unter Berücksichtigung der Dimension Bewusstsein. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F.O., Mayer, D.M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K. & Christensen, A.L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leadermember exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115 (2), 204 – 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Stangel-Meseke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stangel-Meseke, M. (2019). Practical Wisdom: A Key to a Successful Implementation of Lateral Leadership. In: Stangel-Meseke, M., Boven, C., Braun, G., Habisch, A., Scherle, N., Ihlenburg, F. (eds) Practical Wisdom and Diversity. Wirtschaft – Organisation – Personal. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23521-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics