Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Birth to Early Child Care: The Newborn Cohort Study of the National Educational Panel Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education as a Lifelong Process

Part of the book series: Edition ZfE ((EZFE,volume 3))

Abstract

The newborn cohort study in the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) takes up the challenge of measuring education-relevant conditions and processes together with the development of competencies in the first years of a child’s life. The rationale for beginning “from the crib on” can be found in results of infant and early childhood research. We review the design and main features of existing birth cohort studies in the field of education conducted in developed countries. Most studies begin when infants are between 6 and 11 months old with subsequent waves annually or every second year. The most common instruments are computer-assisted parent interviews sometimes accompanied by additional self-completion modules or completely self-administered questionnaires. We discuss early childhood developmental indicators and instruments that can be applied in large-scale assessments carried out in private homes. We favor measurements with predictive validity for subsequent development. The newborn cohort study (NEPS Starting Cohort 1; NEPS-SC1) started in 2012 with a representative sample of almost 3,500 children born that year in Germany.

Zusammenfassung

Die Säuglingskohortenstudie des Nationalen Bildungspanels stellt sich der Herausforderung, Bedingungen und Prozesse der frühkindlichen Bildung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Fähigkeiten und Kompetenzen in den ersten Lebensjahren zu erfassen. Die Notwendigkeit, bildungsrelevante Faktoren und Entwicklungen „von Geburt an“ zu erheben, ergibt sich aus Ergebnissen der Säuglings- und Kindheitsforschung. Zunächst werden inhaltliche Schwerpunkte zum Thema Bildungsforschung und das Design bisheriger längsschnittlicher Säuglingskohorten beschrieben, die in industrialisierten Ländern durchgeführt wurden. Die meisten dieser Studien beginnen mit der ersten Erhebung, wenn die Kinder zwischen 6 und 11 Monate alt sind. Die Folgeerhebungen werden im Abstand von ein bis zwei Jahren durchgeführt. Häufig werden computergestützte Elterninterviews eingesetzt und zum Teil um handschriftlich auszufüllende Elternfragebögen ergänzt. Im Anschluss werden Instrumente zur Erfassung kindlicher Kompetenzen und Fähigkeiten diskutiert, die sowohl prädiktive Validität für die weitere kindliche Entwicklung haben als auch in großangelegten, repräsentativen Studien im häuslichen Setting einsetzbar sind. Im Nationalen Bildungspanel starteten die Erhebungen der Säuglingskohortenstudie (NEPS-Startkohorte 1: NEPS-SC1) im Jahr 2012 mit einer repräsentativen Stichprobe von fast 3.500 Kindern, die im selben Jahr in Deutschland geboren wurden.

This article is an updated version of Schlesiger et al. (2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For details see http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/.

  2. 2.

    Not mentioned in Table 11.1 is the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) that has expanded its survey program and is gathering additional education-relevant information with questionnaires on newborns since 2003, on 2- to 3-year olds since 2005, on 5- to 6-year olds since 2008, and so forth (see also https://www.diw.de/en/diw_02.c.238114.en/questionnaires_fieldwork_documents.html).

  3. 3.

    For details see http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/.

  4. 4.

    A complete list of all study instruments and their rationale can be found on the website of the NICHD, see https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/seccyd.

  5. 5.

    Due to the unexpected high response rate, families with children born in July were not contacted by the survey institute. Consequently, all children in SC1 were born between February and June 2012.

References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1983). Parenting Stress Index Manual. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aßmann, C., Zinn, S., & Würbach, A. (2015). Sampling and weighting the sample of the early childhood cohort of the National Educational Panel Study (Technical Report of SUF SC1 Version 2.0.0). Retrieved from https://www.neps-data.de/Portals/0/Survey%20Papers/SP_VIII.pdf.

  • Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Lowe Vandell, D., Clarke-Stewart, K., & Tresch Owen, M. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78, 681–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F. (2000). Children’s thinking: Development function and individual differences (3rd ed.). Belmont, TN: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomeyer, D., Laucht, M., Coneus, K., & Pfeiffer, F. (2013). Early life adversity and children’s competence development: Evidence from the Mannheim Study of Children at Risk. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 233, 467–485. http://www.jbnst.de/download/2013-top/Blomeyer_et_al_2013.pdf.

  • Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C., Bell, C., Haynes, O. M., Slater, A., Golding, J., Wolke, D., & the ALSPAC Study Team. (2006). Stability in cognition across early childhood: A developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 17, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Sigman, M. D. (1986). Continuity in mental development from infancy. Child Development, 57, 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1989). Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Maternal responsiveness: Characteristics and consequences (pp. 49–62). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (1999). First words in the second year: Continuity, stability, and models of concurrent and predictive correspondence in vocabulary and verbal responsiveness across age and context. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs-Gowan, M. J., & Carter, A. S. (2002). Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) Manual, Version 2.0. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (2005). Zwölfter Kinder- und Jugendbericht. Bericht über die Lebenssituation junger Menschen und Leistungen der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in Deutschland. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/15/060/1506014.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2010.

  • Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, W. B., & McDevitt, S. C. (2007). Carey Temperament Scales (CTS). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, J., Shaddy D. J., Blaga, O. M., Anderson, C. J., Kannass, K. N., & Richman, W. A. (2009). Early attentional predictors of vocabulary in childhood. In J. Colombo, P. McCardle, & L. Freund (Eds.), Infant pathways to language: Methods, models, and research directions (pp. 143–168). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conboy, B. T., & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77, 712–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1989). NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domsch, H., Lohaus, A., & Hoben, T. (2009). Prediction of childhood cognitive abilities from a set of early indicators of information processing capabilities. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(1), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - revised. Circle Pines, MI: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F., Holland, C. R., & Wheeler, K. (2007): The prediction, from infancy, of adult IQ and achievement. Intelligence, 35, 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F., & McGrath, S. K. (1981). Infant recognition memory and later intelligence. Intelligence, 5, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F., & Singer, L. T. (1983). Infant recognition memory as a measure of intelligence. In L. P. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 31–78). Norwood, MA: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethik S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., & Reilly, J. S. (1991). Technical manual for MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Marchmann, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur- Bates Communicative Development Inventories. User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fthenakis, W. E., Gisbert, K., Griebel, W., Kunze, H.-R., Niesel, R., & Wustmann, C. (2007). Auf den Anfang kommt es an: Perspektiven für eine Neuorientierung frühkindlicher Bildung. Bonn, Germany: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. (1990). Children of the nineties: A longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood based on the population of Avon (ALSPAC). West of England Medical Journal, 105, 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollenberg, A. L., & Lynch, C. D. (2009). Concurrent validity of the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 2nd ed. with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II in a low-risk sample. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36, 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2000). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, H. (1999). Störungen der Sprachentwicklung. Grundlagen – Ursachen – Diagnose – Intervention – Prävention. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, K. E., & Grossmann, K. (2003). (Eds.). Bindung und menschliche Entwicklung. John Bowlby, Mary Ainsworth und die Grundlagen der Bindungstheorie. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, M., Taylor, G., Drotar, D., & Schluchter, M. (2005). Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics, 116, 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, T., Forry, N., Hair, E., Perper, K., Wandner, L., Wessel, J., & Vick, J. (2009). Disparities in early learning and development: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K., & Joshi, H. (2007). Millennium Cohort Study. Second survey. A user’s guide to initial findings. London, England: Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., & Clifford, R. M. (1989). Family Day Care Rating Scale. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2003). Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale (revised ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (1983). Infant cognition. In M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Infancy and developmental psychobiology. (4th ed., pp. 689–782). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennon, E., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2000). Die besondere Reise vom Fötus zum spracherwerbenden Kind. In H. Grimm (Ed.), Sprachentwicklung. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, C/III/3 (pp. 41–103). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavšek, M. (2004). Predicting later IQ from infant visual habituation and dishabituation: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 369–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korntheuer, P., Lissmann, I., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Bindungssicherheit und die Entwicklung von Sprache und Kognition. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 16, 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laucht, M., Esser, G., & Schmidt, M. H. (2000). Längsschnittforschung zur Entwicklungsepidemiologie psychischer Störungen: Zielsetzung, Konzeption und zentrale Befunde der Mannheimer Risikokinderstudie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 29, 246–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, E. M., Gardner, J. M., Karmel, B. Z., & Flory, M. J. (2008). Bayley Scales of Infant Development. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (pp. 145–156). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohaus, A., Keller, H., Ball, J., Voelker, S., & Elben, C. (2004). Maternal sensitivity in interactions with three- and 12-month-old infants: Stability, structural composition, and developmental consequences. Infant and Child Development, 13, 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia: Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2(4), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-015-0067-1; https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/50671.

  • Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchman, V. A., Martinez-Sussmann, C., & Dale, P. S. (2004). The language specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual learners. Developmental Science, 7, 212–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B., & Carriger, M. S. (1993). A meta-analysis of infant habituation and recognition memory performance as a predictor of later IQ. Child Development, 64, 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, R. (2003). Motorische Entwicklung. In H. Keller (Ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung (3rd ed., pp. 815–860). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (1999). Child care and mother–child interaction in the first 3 years of life. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1399–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2002). Child-care structure – process – outcome: Direct and indirect effects of child-care quality on young children’s development. Psychological Science, 13, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otyakmaz, B. O. (2007). Familiale Entwicklungskontexte im Kulturvergleich. Cross-cultural comparison of familial context. Lengrich, Germany: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, M., Wilhelm, M. S., Gamble, W. C., & Card, N. A. (2010). A comparison of maternal sensitivity and verbal stimulation as unique predictors of infant social-emotional and cognitive development. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoušek, H., & Bornstein, M. H. (1992). Didactic interactions: Intuitive parental support of vocal and verbal development in human infants. In H. Papoušek, U. Jürgens, & M. Papoušek (Eds.), Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches (pp. 209–229). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauen, S. (2003). Säuglingsforschung aus kognitiver Sicht. In H. Keller (Ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung (3rd ed., pp. 283–318). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, L. (2009). Age 17 language and reading outcomes in late-talking toddlers: Support for a dimensional perspective on language delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roßbach, H.-G. (2005). Effekte qualitativ guter Betreuung, Bildung und Erziehung im frühen Kindesalter auf Kinder und ihre Familien. In Sachverständigenkommission Zwölfter Kinder- und Jugendbericht (Ed.), Bildung, Betreuung und Erziehung von Kindern unter sechs Jahren. Materialien zum 12. Kinder- und Jugendbericht (Vol. 1, pp. 55–174). Munich, Germany: Verlag Deutsches Jugendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roßbach, H.-G., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (Eds.). (2008). Frühpädagogische Förderung in Institutionen (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft: Sonderheft 11). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roßbach, H.-G., & Weinert, S. (2008). Kindliche Kompetenzen im Elementarbereich: Förderbarkeit, Bedeutung und Messung (Bildungsforschung Band 24). Bonn, Germany: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., & Gartstein, M. A. (2008). Temperament. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (pp. 318–333). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesiger, C., Lorenz, J., Weinert, S, Schneider, T. & Roßbach, H.-G. (2011): From birth to early child care. In H.-P. Blossfeld, H.-G. Roßbach, & J. von Maurice (Eds.), Education as a Lifelong Process. The German Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft: Sonderheft 14, pp. 187–202). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, A. & Mann, D. (2015). Qualität elterlichen Interaktionsverhaltens. Erfassung von Interaktionen mithilfe der Eltern-Kind-Interaktions Einschätzskala im Nationalen Bildungspanel (NEPS Working Paper No. 56). Bamberg, Germany: Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsverläufe, Nationales Bildungspanel. https://www.neps-data.de/Portals/0/Working%20Papers/WP_LVI.pdf.

  • Stone, J., Smith, H., & Murphy, L. (1973). The competent infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer, G., & Spietz, A. L. (1995). NCAST Caregiver/Parent–Child Interaction Teaching Manual (2nd ed.). Seattle, WA: NCAST Publications, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W., Bolz, M., Grenner, K., Schlecht, D., & Wellner, B. (2005a). Krippen-Skala. Revidierte Fassung (KRIPS-R). Feststellung und Unterstützung pädagogischer Qualität in Krippen. Deutsche Fassung der Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale – Revised Edition von Thelma Harms, Debby Cryer, Richard M. Clifford. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W., Knobeloch, J., & Gerszonowicz, E. (2005b). Tagespflege-Skala (TAS). Feststellung und Unterstützung pädagogischer Qualität in der Kindertagespflege. Deutsche Fassung der Family Day Care Rating Scale von Thelma Harms und Richard M. Clifford. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, S. (2005). Umschriebene Entwicklungsstörungen der Sprache. In P. F. Schlottke, R. K. Silbereisen, S. Schneider, & G. W. Lauth (Eds.), Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter – Grundlagen und Störungen im Entwicklungsverlauf, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie D/II/5 (pp. 483–543). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, S. (2006). Sprachentwicklung. In W. Schneider & B. Sodian (Eds.), Kognitive Entwicklung. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie C/V/2 (pp. 609–719). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, S. (2007). Kompetenzentwicklung und Kompetenzstruktur im Vorschulalter. In M. Prenzel, I. Gogolin, & H.-H. Krüger (Eds.), Kompetenzdiagnostik (Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft: Sonderheft 8, pp. 89–106). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, S. (2011). Die Anfänge der Sprache: Sprachentwicklung im Kleinkindalter. In H. Keller (Ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung (pp. 610–642). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, S., Linberg, A., Attig, M., Freund, J.-D., & Linberg, T. (2016). Analyzing early child development, influential conditions, and future impacts: Prospects of a German newborn cohort study. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-016-0022-6.

  • Wetherby, A. M., & Prizant, B. M. (1993). Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales – Normed Edition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DLR Project Management Agency, Bonn, Germany

    Claudia Hachul (née Schlesiger)

  2. Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, Bamberg, Germany

    Manja Attig

  3. AWO Family center, Bamberg, Germany

    Jennifer Lorenz

  4. University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Sabine Weinert & Hans-Günther Roßbach

  5. University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Thorsten Schneider

Authors
  1. Claudia Hachul (née Schlesiger)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manja Attig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabine Weinert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thorsten Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hans-Günther Roßbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manja Attig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Hans-Peter Blossfeld

  2. Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Hans-Günther Roßbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hachul (née Schlesiger), C., Attig, M., Lorenz, J., Weinert, S., Schneider, T., Roßbach, HG. (2019). From Birth to Early Child Care: The Newborn Cohort Study of the National Educational Panel Study. In: Blossfeld, HP., Roßbach, HG. (eds) Education as a Lifelong Process. Edition ZfE, vol 3. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23162-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23162-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23161-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23162-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation