Abstract
New technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 promise and allow precise and astonishingly simple ways of editing the human genome. They thereby fuel the wish to cure serious genetic diseases by eradicating them where they emerge – in the genome itself. In order to assess this technology from an analytic-philosophical perspective I want to question whether its application violates the principle of nonmaleficence. By pointing out the now famous Non-Identity Problem (NIP) Derek Parfit showed that this proves to be very difficult in cases in which our actions affect the welfare together with the identity of future living individuals. My interest in this paper is in exploring whether we face the NIP in the case of genome editing, or not. In my view, a two-tier analysis is needed, distinguishing between the question of harm to the “edited-embryo” itself and harm to its descendants in the case of genetic interventions in the germline. While we do not face the NIP in the first generation of genetically edited embryos, and while there is a high risk of harm in these cases, it does hold in the next generation, which makes it surprisingly hard to oppose invasions in the human germline with the help of the principle of nonmaleficence. I present and discuss my analysis here, which might help to resolve certain misconceptions of harm and to set boundaries in an apparently harm-free area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boonin, David. 2008. How to Solve the Non-Identity Problem. Public Affairs Quarterly 22: 127–157.
Boonin, David. 2014. The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brock, Dan W. 1995. The Non-Identity Problem and Genetic Harms. The Case of Wrongful Handicaps. Bioethics 9: 269–275.
Brock, Dan W. 2005. Shaping Future Children. Parental Rights and Societal Interests. Journal of Political Philosophy 13: 377–398.
Buchanan, Allen, et al. (eds.). 2000. From Chance to Choice. Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1984. Harm to Others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1985. Wrongful Conception and the Right not to be Harmed. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 8: 57–77.
Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Wrongful Life and the Counterfactual Element in Harming. Social Philosophy and Policy 4: 145–178.
Feinberg, Joel. 1988. Harmless Wrongdoing. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1992. The Child’s Right to an Open Future. In Freedom and Fulfillment. Philosophical Essays, Feinberg, Joel (ed.), 76–97. West Sussex: Princeton University Press.
German Ethics Council. 2017. Germline Intervention in the Human Embryo: German Ethics Council Calls for Global Political Debate and International Regulation. Ad Hoc Recommendation. http://www.ethikrat.org/publications/ad-hoc-recommendations/files/recommendation-germline-intervention-in-the-human-embryo.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Glover, Jonathan. 2006. Choosing Children. Genes, Disability, and Design. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hanser, Matthew. 1990. Harming Future People. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 47–70.
Harman, Elizabeth. 2004. Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating? Philosophical Perspectives 18: 89–113.
Heyd, David. 1992. Genethics. Moral Issues in the Creation of People. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heyd, David. 2014. Parfit on the Non-identity Problem, Again. Law & Ethics of Human Rights 8: 1–20.
Holtug, Nils. 1999a. Does Justice Require Medical Enhancements. Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 37–143.
Holtug, Nils. 1999b. Utility, Priority and Possible People. Utilitas 11: 16–36.
Holtug, Nils. 2002. The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5: 357–389.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1982. The Paradox of Future Individuals. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 93–112.
Kitcher, Philip. 1997. The Lives to Come. The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. New York: Touchstone.
Parfit, Derek. 1982. Future Generations: Further Problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 113–172.
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Parfit, Derek. 2004. Overpopulation and the Quality of Life. In The Repugnant Conclusion. Essays on Population Ethics, Ryberg, Jesper, and Torbjӧrn Tännsjӧ (eds.), 7–22. Dordrecht: Springer.
Parfit, Derek. 2010. On Doing the Best for Our Children. In Population and Political Theory, Fishkin, James S., and Robert E. Goodin (eds.), 68–80. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rakowski, Eric. 2002. Who Should Pay for Bad Genes? California Law Review 90: 1345–1414.
Roberts, Mary A. 2004. Person-Based Consequentialism and the Procreation Obligation. In The Repugnant Conclusion. Essays on Population Ethics, Ryberg, Jesper, and Torbjörn Tännsjö (eds.), 99–127. Dordrecht: Springer.
Roberts, Mary A. 2007. The Non-Identity Fallacy: Harm, Probability and Another Look at Parfit’s Depletion Example. Utilitas 19: 267–311.
Roberts, Mary A. 2009. What is the Wrong of Wrongful Disability. From Chance to Choice to Harms to Persons. Law and Philosophy 28: 1–57.
Roberts, Mary A. 2009. The Nonidentity Problem and the Two Envelope Problem: When is One Act Better for a Person than Another? In Harming Future Persons. Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem, Roberts, Melinda A., and David T. Wassermann (eds.), 201–228. New York: Springer.
Roberts, Mary A., and David T. Wasserman (eds.). 2009. Harming Future Persons. Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. New York: Springer.
Robertson, John A. 1994. Children of Choice. Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Robertson, John A. 1996. Genetic Selection of Offspring Characteristics. Boston University Law Review 76: 421–482.
Robertson, John A. 2003a. Procreative Liberty in the Era of Genomics. American Journal of Law & Medicine 29: 439–487.
Robertson, John A. 2003b. Extending Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: The Ethical Debate. Human Reproduction 18: 465–471.
Robertson, John A. 2004. Procreative Liberty and Harm to Offspring in Assisted Reproduction. American Journal of Law & Medicine 30: 7–40.
Savulescu, Julian. 2001. Procreative Beneficence. Why We Should Select the Best Children. Bioethics 15: 413–426.
Savulescu, Julian, and Guy Kahane. 2009. The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life. Bioethics 23: 274–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Omerbasic, A. (2018). Genome Editing, Non-Identity and the Notion of Harm. In: Braun, M., Schickl, H., Dabrock, P. (eds) Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22660-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22660-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22659-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22660-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)