Skip to main content

Higher Education Institutions as Transformative Agents for a Sustainable Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Chancen und Grenzen der Nachhaltigkeitstransformation

Zusammenfassung

Higher education institutions (HEIs) are transformative societal agents that can contribute decisively to the development of sustainable societies. A variety of global initiatives, such as the United Nation’s (UN) Higher Education and Research for Sustainable Development (HESD), already recognize the important role HEIs can play in this transformation and aim to embed sustainable development (SD) as an integral part of HEIs. Decision- makers in HEIs acknowledge these initiatives and make use of the provided guidelines or frameworks. So far, a variety of HEIs have adopted such measures. However, due to disciplinary boundaries and a traditional orientation, they tend to integrate SD only partially instead of systematically throughout the entire institution. This chapter describes the requirements for overcoming these barriers and for making SD an integral part of an HEI in a way that it can guide the transformation into a sustainable society. It also highlights the necessity of transdisciplinarity in research and education, as well as discusses the potential of impact orientation in sustainability assessment and reporting to support transdisciplinary approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These steps cannot be interpreted in terms of a hierarchy. Transdisciplinary approaches do not supersede disciplinary or inter-disciplinary approaches (Lang et al. 2012, p. 40). All approaches have their advantages and can be seen as complementary instead of contradictory (Godemann et al. 2014, p. 228).

References

  • Adams CA (2013) Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities – Challenges and benefits. Sustain Acc Manage Policy J 4(3):384–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzosa A, Bernaldo MO, Fernández-Sanchez G (2017) Sustainability assessment tools for higher education: An empirical comparative analysis. J Clean Prod 161:812–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C, Geuna A (2010) Universities in the new knowledge landscape: Tensions, challenges, change—an introduction. Minerva 48(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese A, Costa R, Levialdi N, Menichini T (2016) A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. J Clean Prod 121:248–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceulemans K, Molderez I, Van Liedekerke L (2015) Sustainability reporting in higher education: a comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research. J Clean Prod 106:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable Future. Plan High Educ 31(3):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhá J, Pospíšilová M (2017) Education for sustainable development goals in public debate: the importance of participatory research in reflecting and supporting the consultation process in developing a vision for Czech education. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutch national research agenda (DNRA) (2016) Dutch national research agenda. https://issuu.com/nationalewetenschapsagenda/docs/nwa_eng_2016_small?e=0/36706054. Accessed: 16. Oct. 2017

  • European Foundation for Management Development (EFMD) (2017) EFMD Launch Business School Impact System (BSIS). http://www.efmd.org/blog/view/467-efmd-launch-business-school-impact-survey. Accessed: 20. Oct. 2017

  • European Commission (2014) Horizon 2020 work program 2014-2015 general Annexes H. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-h-esacrit_en.pdf. Accessed: 17. Oct. 2017

  • Findler F, Martinuzzi A (2015) Wirkungsverantwortung – Konsequenzen eines neuen CSR-Ansatzes für Unternehmen und Management. In: Luks F (Ed) Rethink Economy. Perspektivenvielfalt in der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – Beispiele aus der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien. Oekom, München, S 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler F, Schönherr N, Lozano R, Reider D, Martinuzzi A (forthcoming) The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. Intern J of Sustain in High Educ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer D, Jenssen S, Tappeser V (2015) Getting an empirical hold of the sustainable university: a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools. Assess Eval High Educ 40(6):785–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godemann J, Bebbington J, Herzig C, Moon J (2014) Higher education and sustainable development: exploring possibilities for organisational change. Acc Audit Account J 27(2):218–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2017a) Sustainability disclosure database. http://database.globalreporting.org/. Accessed: 19. Oct. 2017

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2017b) G4 Online – materiality. https://g4.globalreporting.org/how-you-should-report/reporting-principles/principles-for-defining-report-content/materiality/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed: 25. Oct. 2017

  • Jain S, Aggarwal P, Sharma N, Sharma P (2013) Fostering sustainability through education, research and practice: a case study of TERI University. J Clean Prod 61:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B, O’Riordan T (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Blanc D (2015) Towards integration at last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a network of targets. Sustain Dev 23(3):176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R (2006) Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. J Clean Prod 14(9–11):787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R (2011) The state of sustainability reporting in universities. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Lukman R, Lozano FJ, Huisingh D, Lambrechts W (2013) Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J Clean Prod 48:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Alonso-Almeida M, Huisingh D, Lozano FJ, Waas T, Lambrechts W, Lukman R, Hug J (2015) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas K, Liket K (2011) Social impact measurement: classification of methods. In: Burritt RL, Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Pohjola T, Csutora M (Hrsg) Environmental management accounting and supply chain management. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Research Excellence Framework (REF) (2017) What is the REF? http://www.ref.ac.uk/about/whatref/. Accessed: 18. Oct. 2017

  • Sala S, Ciuffo B, Nijkamp P (2015) A systematic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 119:314–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönherr N, Findler F, Martinuzzi A (2017) Exploring the interface of CSR and the sustainable development goals. Transnatl Corp 24(3):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy C (2014) Measuring enterprise sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 25(2):120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (1972) Declaration of the united nations conference on the human environment. http://www.un-documents.net/unchedec.htm. Accessed: 21. Oct. 2017

  • United Nations (UN) (2017a) Higher Education Sustainability Initiative (HESI). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdinaction/hesi. Accessed: 19. Oct. 2017

  • United Nations (UN) (2017b) Higher Education and Research for Sustainable Development (HESD). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=11748. Accessed: 19. Oct. 2017

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2017) UN Decade of ESD. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd/un-decade-of-esd. Accessed: 21. Oct. 2017

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Tanaka Y (2012) The issues and methodologies in sustainability assessment tools for higher education institutions – A review of recent trends and future challenges. J Educ Sustai Dev 6(1):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Frantzeskaki N, Rotmans J (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7(S1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Findler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Martinuzzi, A. (2019). Higher Education Institutions as Transformative Agents for a Sustainable Society. In: Luks, F. (eds) Chancen und Grenzen der Nachhaltigkeitstransformation . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22438-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22438-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22437-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22438-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics