Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Innovationssysteme pp 121–146Cite as

Governance von Innovationssystemen und die politische Ökonomie der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit: Innovationspolitische Potenziale des Unternehmerischen Staates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Der Staat gehört zu den konstitutiven Komponenten der politischen Einbettung von Innovationssystemen auf nationaler und regionaler Ebene. Statt hierarchischer Steuerungsmodelle prägt der moderierende Netzwerkcharakter staatlicher Innovationspolitik zunehmend die sozialen Strukturen und Interaktionen in Innovationssystemen. Die entsprechende Frage nach den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der politischen Gestaltung von Innovationssystemen verweist auf die Problematik innovationspolitischer Governance. In diesem Zusammenhang kommt der systemischen Interdependenz zwischen organisationalen, sektoralen und politisch-ökonomischen Governance-Strukturen bei der Artikulierung der Unternehmerfunktion in Innovationssystemen eine herausragende Bedeutung zu. Diese staatliche Koordinierung von selektiven Innovationsimpulsen lässt sich im Sinne des schumpeterianischen Konzepts des „unternehmerischen Staates“ nachvollziehen, aufgefasst als spezifische Ausprägung der innovationspolitischen Gestaltung technologischer Neuerungen in entwickelten Industrienationen unter der Bedingung radikaler Unsicherheit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Acs, Z./ Audretsch, D./ Lehmann, E. E./ Licht, G. (2017): National Systems of Innovation. In: Journal of Technology Transfer 42. 5. 997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T./ Isaksen, A./ Trippl, M. (2019): Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzat, M./ Hanusch, H. (2004): Recent Trends in the Research on National Innovation Systems. In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14. 2. 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, C./ Lundvall, B.-Å./ Haneef, S. (2018): Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A./ Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of Knowledge. Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A./ Chu, W. (2003): Beyond Late Development. Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1988): Technical Change and the Theory of ‚Régulation’. In: G. Dosi/ C. Freeman/ R. Nelson/ G. Silverberg/ L. Soete (Hrsg.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braczyk, H.-J./ Heidenreich, M. (1998): Regional Governance Structures in a Globalized World. In: H.-J. Braczyk/ P. Cooke/ M. Heidenreich (Hrsg.): Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governances in a Globalized Word. London: UCL Press, 414–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (1999): The Economic Theory of the Developmental State. In: M. Woo-Cumings (Hrsg.): The Developmental State. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2001): Rethinking East Asian Industrial Policy. Past Records and Future Prospects. In: P.-K. Wong/ C.-N. Ng (Hrsg.): Industrial Policy, Innovation and Economic Growth. The Experience of Japan and the Asian NIEs, Singapur: Singapore University Press, 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, F. (1991): Technological Competitiveness as a Form of Structural Competitiveness. In: J. Niosi (Hrsg.): Technology and National Competitiveness. Oligopoly, Technological Innovation, and International Competition, Montreal, 142–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, P./ Heitor, M./ Lundvall, B.-Å. (2003): Towards a Learning Society. In: P. Conceição/ M. Heitor/ B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.): Innovation, Competence Building and Social Cohesion in Europe. Towards a Learning Society. Cheltenham: Elgar, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2001): Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters and the Knowledge Economy. In: Industrial and Corporate Change10. 945–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2004): Regional Innovation Systems. An Evolutionary Approach. In: P. Cooke/ M. Heidenreich/ H.-J. Braczyk (Hrsg.): Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 2. Aufl. London: Routledge, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P./ De Laurentis, C./ Tödtling, F./ Trippl, M. (2007): Regional Knowledge Economies. Markets, Clusters and Innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2005): Capitalist Diversity and Change. Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalum, B./ Johnson, B./ Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992): Public Policy in the Learning Society. In: B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.): National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1990): Economic Change and Its Interpretation, or, Is There a “Schumpeterian Approach”? In: A. Heertje/ M. Perlman (Hrsg.): Evolving Technology and Market Structure. Studies in Schumpeterian Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G./ Tyson, L./ Zysman, J. (1989): Trade, Technologies, and Development. A Framework for Discussing Japan. In: C. Johnson/ L. Tyson/ J. Zysman (Hrsg.): Politics and Productivity. The Real Story of Why Japan Works. New York: Ballinger, 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (1999) Understanding Varieties in the Structure and Performance of National Innovation Systems. The Concept of Economic Style. In: J. Groenewegen/ J. Vromen (Hrsg.): Institutions and the Evolution of Capitalism. Implications of Evolutionary Economics. Aldershot: Elgar, 141–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2001). Unternehmerfunktion und Innovationssysteme. Ein schumpeterianischer Ansatz. In: M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt (Hrsg.), Perspektiven des Wandels. Evolutorische Ökonomik in der Anwendung. Marburg: Metropolis, 611–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2006): Institutions, Entrepreneurship and the Rationale of Government. An Outline of the Schumpeterian Theory of the State. In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 59. 4. 497–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2007): Public Policy, Governance, and Innovation. Entrepreneurial States in East Asian Economic Development. In: International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 3. 1. 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2008): Introduction. The Institutions of the Market. In: A. Ebner/ N. Beck (Hrsg.): The Institutions of the Market. Organisations, Social Systems, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2009): Entrepreneurial State: The Schumpeterian Theory of Industrial Policy and the East Asian „Miracle“. In: U. Cantner/ J.-L. Gaffard/ L. Nesta (Hrsg.): Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition, and Growth. Berlin: Springer. 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2010): Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy. Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 10. 3–4. 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2013): Cluster Policies and Entrepreneurial States in East Asia. In: S. Eriksson (Hrsg.): Innovation, Clusters and Economic Growth in Asia. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2014): Die industriepolitische Transformation der ostasiatischen Entwicklungsstaaten. In: A. Nölke/ C. May/ S. Claar (Hrsg.): Der (Wieder‐)Aufstieg des Globalen Südens. Politik und Ökonomie der großen Schwellenländer. Wiesbaden: VS. 135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2016a): Exploring Regional Varieties of Capitalism. In: Regional Studies. 50. 1. Special Issue: Regional Varieties of Capitalism, ed. A. Ebner. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2016b): Institutional Transformations of Technology Policy in East Asia: The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. In: U. Hilpert (Hrsg.): Routledge Handbook of Politics and Technology. London: Routledge. 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A./ Bocek, F. (2015): Best Practices as to How to Support Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 101, Wien: WWWforEurope.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J./ Kuhlmann, S./ Smits, R. (2003): New Governance for Innovation. The Need for Horizontal and Systemic Policy Coordination. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis 2/2003. Karlsruhe: FhG-ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (1997): Systems of Innovation Approaches. Their Emergence and Characteristics. In: C. Edquist (Hrsg.): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Organizations and Institutions. London: Pinter, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (2001): Innovation Policy in the Systems of Innovation Approach. Some Basic Principles. In: M. M. Fischer/ J. Fröhlich (Hrsg.): Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C./ Johnson, B. (1997): Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation, in C. Edquist (Hrsg.): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Organizations and Institutions. London: Pinter, 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, M. (1997): National Imaginations and Systems of Innovation. In: C. Edquist (Hrsg.): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Organizations and Institutions. London: Pinter, 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, K. u. a. (1996): Systemic Competitiveness. A New Challenge for Firms and Governments. In: CEPAL Review 59, August. 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001): Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. In: Sociological Theory 19. 2. 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987): Technology and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1994): Technological Revolutions and Catching-Up. ICT and the NICs. In: J. Fagerberg u. a. (Hrsg.): The Dynamics of Technology, Trade and Growth. Aldershot: Elgar, 198–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1995): The “National System of Innovation” in Historical Perspective. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 19. 1. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (2002): Continental, National and Sub-National Innovation Systems – Complementarity and Economic Growth. In: Research Policy 31. 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (2004): Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 13. 3. 541–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C./ Perez, C. (1988): Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. In: G. Dosi u. a. (Hrsg.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 38–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C./ Louçã, F. (2001): As Time Goes By. Form the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C./ Soete, L. (1997): The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3. Aufl. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromhold-Eisebith, E. (2007): Bridging Scales in Innovation Policies. How To Link Regional, National and International Innovation Systems, In: European Planning Studies 15. 2. 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2004): From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems. Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory, In: Research Policy 33. 897–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1984): The Age of Schumpeter. American Economic Review 74. 2. 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. (1999): Innovationspolitik im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Zur neuen Architektur des Staatlichen. In: K. Grimmer/ S. Kuhlmann/ F. Meyer-Krahmer (Hrsg.): Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A./ Soskice, D. (2001): An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: P. A. Hall/ D. Soskice (Hrsg.): Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch, H./ Pyka, A. (2007): Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 31. 2. 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauff, V./ Scharpf, F. W. (1977): Modernisierung der Volkswirtschaft. Technologiepolitik als Strukturpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: EVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000): Doing Institutional Analysis. Implications for the Study of Innovations. In: Review of International Political Economy 7. 4. 595–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R./ Boyer, R. (1997): Coordination of Economic Actors and Social Systems of Production. In: J. R. Hollingsworth/ R. Boyer (Hrsg.): Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D. (1996): Nationale Innovationssysteme, soziales Kapital und Innovationsstrategien von Unternehmen. In: Soziale Welt 47. 411–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002): The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1992) Institutional Learning. In: B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.): National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1996): Technologiepolitik als Lernprozeß. In: D. Grimm (Hrsg.): Staatsaufgaben. Frankfurt am Main: suhrkamp, 391–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. (1999): Politisches System und Innovationssystem in „postnationalen“ Arenen. In: K. Grimmer/ S. Kuhlmann/ F. Meyer-Krahmer (Hrsg.): Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. (2001): Future Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe – Three Scenarios. In: Research Policy 30. 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S./ Schmoch, U./ Heinze, T. (2003): Governance der Kooperation heterogener Partner im deutschen Forschungs- und Innovationssystem. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis 1/2003. Karlsruhe: FhG-ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkis, M. (2015): Regionale Clusterfelder für Erneuerbare Energien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larédo, P./ Mustar, P. (2001): General Conclusion. Three Major Trends in Research. In: P. Larédo/ P. Mustar (Hrsg.): Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar. 497–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985): Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Industrial Development Research Series 31. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992a) Introduction. In: B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992b): User-Producer-Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalisation. In: B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.): National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1998): Why Study National Systems and National Styles of Innovation?, In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10. 4. 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2002): Innovation Policy in the Globalizing Learning Economy. In: D. Archibugi/ B.-Å Lundvall (Hrsg.): The Globalizing Learning Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2006): Nation States, Social Capital and Economic Development – A System’s Approach to Knowledge Creation and Learning. Aalborg University Research Center on Development and International Relations Working Paper 135. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B-Å. (2007): National Innovation Systems – Analytical Concept and Development Tool. In: Industry and Innovation 14. 1. 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B-Å./ Johnson, B./ Andersen, E. S./ Dalum, B. (2002): National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence-Building. In: Research Policy 31, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, S. (2002): Government, Innovation and Technology Policy. An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2001): Triebkräfte der Technikentwicklung und die Rolle des Staates. In: G. Simonis/ R. Martinsen/ T. Saretzki (Hrsg.): Politik und Technik. Analysen zum Verständnis von technologischem, politischem und staatlichen Wandel am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 31, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2004): Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/1. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2011): The Entrepreneurial State, London: Demos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2018). From Market Fixing to Market Creating, in J. Niosi (Hrsg): Innovation Systems, Policy and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D. (1997): The Network Society. Economic Development and International Competitiveness as Problems of Social Governance. London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2005): Institutional Complementarities, Path Dependency, and the Dynamics of Firms. In: G. Morgan/ R. Whitley/ E. Moen (Hrsg.): Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mytelka, L. K./ Smith, K. (2002): Policy Learning and Innovation Theory. An Interactive and Co-Evolving Process. In: Research Policy 31. 1467–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1995): Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change. In: Journal of Economic Literature XXXIII. 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (2002): The Problem of Market Bias in Modern Capitalist Economies. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 11. 207–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (2004): The Challenge of Building an Effective Innovation System for Catch-Up. In: Oxford Development Studies 32. 3. 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (2008): The Co-Evolution of Institutions and Technologies in Market Economies. In: A. Ebner/ N. Beck (Hrsg.): The Institutions of the Market. Organizations, Social Systems and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 253–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Rosenberg, N. (1993): Technical Innovation and National Systems. In: R. Nelson (Hrsg.): National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Winter, S. (2002): Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 16. 2. 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Winter, S. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J./ Bellon, B. (1996): The Globalization of National Innovation Systems. In: J. de la Mothe/ G. Paquet (Hrsg.): Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy. London: Pinter, 138–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J. u. a. (1993): National Systems of Innovation. In Search of a Workable Concept. Technology in Society 15, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000): Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Riain, S. (2004): The Politics of High-Tech Growth. Developmental Network States in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005): Governance of Innovation Systems I. Synthesis Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P./ Pavitt, K. (1994): National Innovation Systems. Why They Are Important, And How They Might be Measured and Compared. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3. 1. 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K./ Patel, P. (1999) Global Corporations and National Systems of Innovation: Who Dominates Whom? In: D. Archibugi/ J. Howells/ J. Michie (Hrsg.): Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J./ Theodore, N. (2007): Variegated Capitalism. In: Progress in Human Geography 31. 6. 731–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (1983): Structural Change and the Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social Systems. In: Futures 15. 4. 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (1990): Technical Change, Competitive Restructuring and Institutional Reform in Developing Countries. World Bank Strategic Planning and Review Discussion Paper 4. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. (2004): National Systems of Innovation and National Systems of Corporate Governance. A Missing Link? In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13. 1. 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2007): One Economics, Many Recipes. Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P. (1996): Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P. (2001): Networks, National Innovation Systems and Self-Organisation. In: M. M. Fischer/ J. Fröhlich (Hrsg.): Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H./ Ebner, A. (2012): The Role of Domestic and International Cluster Linkages Explored on the Example of Buyer-Supplier Relations in Learning Regions. A Cross-Functional Assessment. In: European Planning Studies 20. 5. 683–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schienstock, G. (2004): From Path Dependency to Path Creation. A New Challenge to the Systems of Innovation Approach. In: G. Schienstock (Hrsg.): Embracing the Knowledge Economy. The Dynamic Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System. Cheltenham: Elgar, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V. (2008): Politiknetzwerke und die Steuerung komplexer Gesellschaften. In: A. Ebner/ K. Heine/ J. Schnellenbach (Hrsg.): Innovation zwischen Markt und Staat. Die institutionelle Dynamik des wirtschaftlichen Wandels. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J./ Steinmueller, W. E. (2018): Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change. In: Research Policy 47. 9. 1554–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1926): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, 2. Auflage. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939): Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, 2 Bände. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1951): Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In: R. V. Clemence (Hrsg.): Essays of J. A. Schumpeter. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 248–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, R./ Kuhlmann, S. (2004): The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy. In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1. 1.–2. 4–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M./ Scott, A.J. (1995): The Wealth of Regions. Market Forces and Policy Imperatives in Local and Global Context. In: Futures 27. 5. 505–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1995): Regional Technology Coalitions. An Essential Dimension of National Technology Policy. In: Research Policy 24. 6. 895–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1996): Managerial Objectives and Technological Collaboration. The Role of National Variations in Cultures and Structures. In: R. Coombs u. a. (Hrsg.): Technological Collaboration. The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar, 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1996): Globalization and Its Limits. Reports of the Death of the National Economy are Greatly Exaggerated. In: S. Berger/ R. Dore (Hrsg.): National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999): Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2000): The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies. Business Systems, Firm Types, and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies. In: Organization Studies 21. 5. 855–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2005): How National are Business Systems? The Role of States and Complementary Institutions in Standardizing Systems of Economic Coordination and Control at the National Level. In: G. Morgan/ R. Whitley/ E. Moen (Hrsg.): Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (2002): Dystopia. Studien zur Krisis des Wissens in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1994): How Institutions Create Historically Rooted Trajectories of Growth. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 3. 1. 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Alexander Ebner

Authors
  1. Alexander Ebner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Ebner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Alexander Ebner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ebner, A. (2020). Governance von Innovationssystemen und die politische Ökonomie der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit: Innovationspolitische Potenziale des Unternehmerischen Staates. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Ebner, A. (eds) Innovationssysteme. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22343-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22343-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22343-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation