Abstract
During the second half of the nineteenth century, plant surveys of ballast grounds were executed in earnest at the commercial waterfront territories of Philadelphia and New York City. Botanists, led by Aubrey H. Smith of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and Addison Brown of the Torrey Botanical Club, identified sites of reclaimed land formed by the deposition of merchant ships’ stone, sand, and gravel ballast as well as other debris. Colonies of plants emerged from these ballast lands, often from seeds that had inadvertently been transported by commercial ships. Dubbed “adventive flora” by the botanists and hailing from Great Britain, Europe, South America, and the West Indies, the ballast plant species were identified and tracked over a series of years to determine their success in their new environment. The botanists championed the novelty of the ballast plants, but by the late nineteenth century, federal legislation controlling the entry of plants into the United States was enacted. Interestingly, immigration reform acts also surged at this time, ostensibly to prevent disease transmission but also “racial taint.” The arguments legislating plants and defining “noxious weeds” were uncannily similar. However, the opportunistic adaptability of these ballast plants as well as their genetic diversity provides them with the very characteristics necessary to thrive in a changing climate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown, A. (1878). Plants introduced with ballast and on made land. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 6(45), 255–258.
Brown, A. (1879). Ballast plants in New York City and its Vicinity. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 6(59), 353–360.
Brown, A. (1880). Ballast plants in and near New York City. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 7(12), 122–126.
Burk, I. (1877). List of plants recently collected on ships’ ballast in the neighborhood of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 29, 105–109.
Emerson, R. W. (1904). The fortune of the republic. The complete works of Ralph Waldo Emerson: Miscellanies (vol. 11, pp. 512–544). New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Gray, J. (2017). Pattern behind the Realism: The Jensen graphic. In B. Barry & G. Jennifer (eds.), Frank Lloyd Wright: Unpacking the Archive (pp. 24–32). New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
Jensen, J. (1939). Our native landscape. Siftings: The major portion of the clearing and collected writings (pp. 56–60). Chicago: Ralph Fletcher Seymour Publisher.
Knoblock, G. A. (2014). The American Clipper Ship, 1845–1920: A comprehensive history, with a listing of builders and their ships. Jefferson: McFarland & Company Inc.
Smith, A. H. (1867). On colonies of plants observed near Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 19, 15–24.
United States Congress. (1917). Plant Quarantine Act, as amended March 4, 1913, and March 4, 1917. Washington, D.C.: United States Library of Congress.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seavitt Nordenson, C. (2019). Queer Ecologies: Ballast Plants in the New World. In: Berr, K., Jenal, C. (eds) Landschaftskonflikte. RaumFragen: Stadt – Region – Landschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22325-0_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22325-0_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22324-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22325-0
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)