Advertisement

What Makes Sensation of a Sentient Thing Possible: The Concept of Time in the Work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty

  • Ulrike Tikvah KissmannEmail author
Chapter
  • 467 Downloads

Abstract

In this contribution, I will analyze the conceptualization of time in the work of Merleau-Ponty and how it shapes the idea of bodily intentionality. In his late work, a nonlinear concept of time prevails and fosters the idea of fleshly agency. I will draw upon “the immemorial” as “impossible past” (Merleau-Ponty 1968: 123) and ask to what extent the idea of originary pastness enables an approach to agency that broadens the current discussion of “new materialism.” In particular, I will argue that the immemorial institutes a temporality that is generative of meaning. As invisible or unconscious, it is written into the structure of flesh and makes self-differentiation possible. Hence, the emergence of self, other, and the world – or rather, as Merleau-Ponty puts it, the emergence of sentient, sensed, and the rest. Under that premise, humans and non-humans can be equated from a methodological point of view. However, there are also differences to the principle of generalized symmetry of Actor-Network Theory. I will show that only flesh comprises generative power, not matter. Finally, I will present the consequences that follow from Merleau-Ponty’s ontology of flesh and introduce video hermeneutics as developed in Kissmann (2014a).

Keywords

Time Ontology of flesh Chiasm Intercorporeity Immemorial Video hermeneutics Habituality 

References

  1. Al-Saji, A. 2007. The Temporality of Life. Merleau-Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past. The Southern Journal of Philosophy XLV: 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbaras, R. 2004 [1991]: The Being of the Phenomenon. Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. (Translated by Ted Toadvine and Leonard Lawlor). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1996 [1966]: Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, Henri. 2004. [1896]: Matter and Memory. Essay on the Relation of Body and Spirit, translated by N. Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  6. Bohnsack, Ralf. 2009. Qualitative Bild- und Videointerpretation. Die dokumentarische Methode, Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  7. Bongaerts, G. 2003. Eingefleischte Sozialität. Zur Phänomenologie sozialer Praxis. Sociologia Internationalis 41 (1): 25–53.Google Scholar
  8. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation. Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, ed. John Law, p. 196–233 London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Carbone, Mauro. 2004. The Thinking of the Sensible. Merleau-Ponty’s A-Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coenen, Herman. 1985. Diesseits von subjektivem Sinn und kollektivem Zwang. Schütz – Durkheim – Merleau-Ponty. Phänomenologische Soziologie im Feld des zwischenleiblichen Verhaltens. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1997 [1980]: Tausend Plateaus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrari, M. 2016. The Immemorial Time of Gender. Merleau-Ponty’s Polymorphic Matrix of Original Past. Chiasmi International. Trilingual Studies Concerning the Thought of Merleau-Ponty 18: 261–274.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, Christian, J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London et al.: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. 1991 [1893–1917]: On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time, translated by J. B. Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah. 2009a. How Medical Forms are Used. The Study of Doctor-Patient Consultations from a Sociological Hermeneutic Approach. In Video Interaction Analysis: Methods and Methodology, ed. Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann, p. 87–105. Frankfurt/M. et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Kissmann, U. T. 2009b. Fürsorgliche Orientierung jenseits des Arzt-Patienten Verhältnisses: Informationsarbeit im Operationssaal. Feministische Studien 27 (2): 302–315.Google Scholar
  17. Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah 2014a. Die Sozialität des Visuellen. Fundierung der hermeneutischen Videoanalyse und materiale Untersuchungen. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  18. Kissmann, U. T. 2014b. How Hegemonic Masculinity can be Undermined. Gender Hierarchies and Power Relations in the Operating Room. Science, Technology and Innovations Studies 10 (2): 45–64.Google Scholar
  19. Kissmann, Ulrike Tikvah. 2016a. Gibt es objektive Gesten und Mimik? Zum leiblichen Gedächtnis als Typisierungen leiblichen Sinns. In Der Körper als soziales Gedächtnis. Book series “Soziales Gedächtnis, Erinnern und Vergessen – Memory Studies”, eds. Michael Heinlein, O. Dimbath, L. Schindler, and P. Wehling, p. 135–152. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  20. Kissmann, U. T. 2016b. Ein Plädoyer für Missverständnisse. Methodologische Einsichten aus Ethnomethodologie und Leibphänomenologie. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, Bruno. 2008. What is the Style of Matters of Concern? Spinoza Lectures. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  23. Mazis, Glen A. 1992. Merleau-Ponty and the “Backward Flow” of Time. The Reversibility of Temporality and the Temporality of Reversibility. In Merleau-Ponty, Hermeneutics, and Postmodernism, eds. Thomas Busch, and Shaun Gallagher, p. 53–68. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968 [1964]: The Visible and the Invisible. (Edited by Claude Lefort and translated by Alphonso Lingis). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2010 [1954–1955]: Institution and Passivity. Course Notes from the Collège de France. (Translated by Leonard Lawlor and Heath Massey). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012 [1945]: Phenomenology of Perception. (Translated by Donald A. Landes). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Mondada, L. 2003. Working with Video. How Surgeons Produce Video Records of their Actions. Visual Studies 18 (1): 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. Operating Together through Videoconference. Members’ Procedures for Accomplishing a Common Space of Action. In Orders of Ordinary Action. Respecifying Sociological Knowledge, eds. Stephen Hester, and David Francis, p. 51–67. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1982. The Phenomenological Movement. A Historical Introduction. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuma, René, B. Schnettler, and H. Knoblauch. 2013. Videographie. Einführung in die interpretative Videoanalyse sozialer Situationen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  31. Young, Iris Marion. 2005 [1980]. Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality. In On Female Body Experience. “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays, ed. Iris Marion Young, p. 27–45. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeit Online. 2013. Ein umgekehrter Hitlergruß? Zeit Online. https://www.zeit.de/sport/2013-12/anelka-quenelle-frankreich-debatte. (Downloaded on April 29, 2018).

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations